Saturday, March 10, 2007

Good Lord I have seen everything Hat tip to Mr B

I read a small detail in the link Mr B provided about forced circumcision. We have heard horror stories about women being forced into circumcision. However a quick check in Googe under male forced circumcision reveals this practice does happen and it doesn't take a genuis to figure out who is doing the deed.

There is something seriously wrong and twisted with people who feel compelled to do this by force. We are aware of the health benefits of circumcision. However, forced alteration of genetalia is a new low. Yet should any non lethal behavior in the name of Jihad surprise us.

9 comments:

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

They better pray that God never tells us to kill them.

beakerkin said...

This isnanity is practiced in Sudan and Indonesia. Given all the other horror stories this is on the back page.

Always On Watch said...

I wasn't aware of the male forced circumsion you speak of here. Of course, I knew about clitorectomies--a barbaric "custom" practiced by many tribal cultures, perhaps even the Aztecs, who seem to have loved rubbing hot peppers into the "tipili parts" of women who were caught in adultery or in masturbation. The goal, of course, was to make sexual activity painful so that these women would never again want any sexual pleasure. Sometimes, however, the practice led to the opposite effect.

[Why am I telling this? The things I know!]

Anyway....In modern societies today, the circumcision of male babies is done in an hygienic fashion. Not so in the Sudan and in Indonesia! I have visions of sending leftard multiculturalists--adults--there and letting THEM undergo some genital mutilation and see how they like it: nymphomania.

PS: What is it with Muslims and the penchant for cutting off body parts???

beakerkin said...

AOW

I understand that circumcision is important in the Islamic culture. However forcing someone to undergo this procedure is cruel and much worse than anything done at Abu Gharib.

The serious problem with Islam is they feel compelled to subject everyone to their theocracy. The record of Islam just never ends. Just when you think you have seen everything they come up with this.

Now the Duck likes to rail about Kahanists. I have never heard of Kahanists advocating any of their theocracy on gentiles. The insane laws of Kahanists are aimed at free
spirits like myself. The prospect of Kahanists forming a circumcision
brigade will not happen.

Always On Watch said...

Beak,
From a woman's perspective....I understand the ritualistic significance of male circumcision. But to mutilate the genitals of women? Lord! Just the thought makes me squirm!

Always On Watch said...

Oops! In an earlier comment "nymphomania" should follow The goal, of course, was to make sexual activity painful so that these women would never again want any sexual pleasure. Sometimes, however, the practice led to the opposite effect:

beakerkin said...

Ducky

The post was not about the prevalence of circumcision in Africa. The post was about forced circumcision in Africa, Indonesia and Iraq. Nobody question the right of people to perform this ritual or that others do it. The issue is forcing people to do it against their will.

There are almost no Jews left in Eithiopia. Moreover, even nutty Kahanists have neither the desire or inclination to see gentiles circumsized. They may mandate this for Jews if they even establish a theocracy. As I have allready has the procedure this is one less thing for the theological nuts to do.

There are many reports of this procedure being performed by Muslims on those who do not seek it. This is a clear human rights violation and odious.

beakerkin said...

Obviously you keep missing the part about forced. Mr Beamish sent a link about the Muslim brutality towarards Sabeans. The story included burnings and a forced circumcision of a Sabean.

I did a quick google search and found that forced Jihadi circumcision of males is done in Indonesia and Sudan. This is not an isolated event.

Nobody has questioned a parents right to perform this procedure. Moreover, Eithiopian Jews perform this practice voluntarily. Forcing unwilling people into circumcision is a clear human rights violation much more severe than placing panties on the heads of Muslims.

As far as irratitional hatreds your anti American and anti Semitic pathologies might qualify you as an expert on irrational hatreds.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

You've got it all wrong, Beak.

With my magic wand I forced the BBC to mention forced male circumcision in an article about Islamic brutality towards a nearly extinct ethnicity in Iraq and it automatically tripped Ducky's haywire reflex.

My research on the leftist inability to engage in rational thought is complete.

For my next opus, I will demonstrate the leftist inability to possess an original opinion.

Watch what happens when Ducky googles "Jabir Salim."