I want to remind people of the differences between our way of life and that of our jihadi and commie enemies. I include commies as they are dedicated to the violent overthrow of the US government.
The United States has a free press and we do allow criticism of the US government. Jihadis and Commies have state controlled media. The mantra from most commies is that we have our own version of corporate media. This is mildly amusing becauseif we did there would be more Conservative news reflective of the market. Thus the NYT has its readership base declining and lurches even more to the left. 167 uses the term zionist media. The zionist media is so effective that it allows fraudulent stories like Qana to get wide play. Now according to the Red Cross the body count remains at 28. The Qana event was staged but how the zionist media permits this is unknown. One will have to ask the brainless anti semite how the zionist media is so dominant but allows hoaxes.
Even Western Journalist must be accompanied by a translator that is selected by the local government. In the case of the AP and Rueters the photographers seem to have been local for security reasons but this presents objectivity problems.
The notion of if we should allow communists into the news business at all in the USA.
Communism is a criminal ideaology with a lengthy history of twisting facts, treason and sedition. It is a movement based upon deception and does seek the overthrow of the US government and the nationalization of resources ( theft). Communists from their inception have pursued revolutionary defeatism. The dominance of Commie front groups in the organizaton of the fake "peace " and illegal alien marches is no accident. In the WW1 era we understood the reality of what communism was and placed people on trial and in many cases deported.
There is the notion of theocracy that the left rais about in this country. A stautue in a courthouse is not theocracy nor is a cross at a war memorial. The Constitution prohibits the establishment of an official state sponsored religion and seperation of Church and state comes from Hugo Black.
That being said I want to remind some people about tolerance. We may not like some unpopular Churches but we should respect peoples freedom to seek God peacefully. This is contrasted with bomb throwing Jihadis who want to kill you, intimidate you or in the last stages extort you. Our country is based on rights and sharia is based upon tolerance and extrtion of non muslims is a right.
I wish to remind Gay bashers that there is a division and lenthy history of Civil law. One may not like Gays but their right to live in peace is part of what seperates us from our enemies. After we persecute gays who is next on the agenda fans of Pat Boone, Abba or the loathsome vile abhorent lifestyle called Red Sox nation. There may or may not be a biological basis shall we persecute midgets, albinos or people with vertical hair like Don King. We should respect gays as fellow human being and let god sort out such matters. That being said religious people have
their right to define their own terms like marriage.
I understand that God is just not PC. The obvious question is who would really want a PC god anyway where almost nothing was wrong. God can not be PC because the nature of religion has a wrinkle akin to ethnocentrism that by itself is not evil. The notion that followers of X have the exclusive path to God is the nature of what religion is. Yet your right to religion ends when it endorses criminal acts such as violence against unbelievers. A person may strugle to get into a tight outfit but jihad does not mean struggle. Nor is there room in America for any notion of religious warfare.
We are Americans ( except for Felis) and our Constitution is our way of life. Far left people try to redefine and create rights that do not exist. The Constitution does protect one from unreasonable searches. However, this does not mean that watching Communists, Jihadis and racial power nuts given their history of violence and treason is illegal, in fact it is a prudent public saftey issue. The notion of privacy is also a myth should I have a right to build a nuclear device in my bedroom.
Of course not but that is a far cry from the government getting involved in the consentual matter of who sleeps with whom. In reality the entire notion of a Government just waiting to charge gays with sodomy was a far left joke. In places like NYC some areas would be ghost towns if that law was enforced and it almost never was. I can picture a bad TV skit CSI sodomy unit but in real life people don't care. Most gays are not like 167 railing at the world and babling incohernetly. The gay person may be the person sitting next to you at a football game or church. They may drive a Harley to the biker rally. Many are religios people and they work in all
vocations. In fact most live ordinary boring lives that are otherwise mundane. We should strive towards respect for peaceful variations of life that are frankly not our business.
Lets try to remember what seperates us from our Jihadi and Communist foes.