Most of you out there are Christians of various types. All of you have different positions on different items. However, none of the Christians I know would edorse violence agaist non-believers or Gays. Many on the far left like to equate stupid statements by Falwell or Robertson with the rhetoric of the Islamic radicals, but it is rather stupid. In fact most of the comments the media highlights are just stupid rather than dangerous.
If Islam is going to stay in the West it must adapt to our traditions and not the other way around. It is perfectly fine for an Imam to preach about infidels going to hell. It is not okay to advocate violence or criminal acts. Free speech has never included incitement to riot. Moreover, holding Falwell's statements under a microscope and not placing Imamic clerics and spokesmen under similar scrutiny is hypocritical.
There are some on the left who try to equate Kahanist with the idiocy comming from Mosques. Kahanists do not have anywhere near the continual track record of violence
of the Muslim terror groups. Leftists will rail about Baruch Goldstein but that was how long ago. I find it remarkable that there are not dozens of Baruch Goldstein's given what Israel puts up with. Kahanist have a vision that is more goofy than dangerous. The left will rail about deportations, but perpetual war is also just as insane.
The far left does not like when its own temples are held under scrutiny. I am sure the Duck can explain why melanin theory is taught in American Colleges. All of us would be against a white professor using the classroom to claim Blacks are inferior.
Yet one can go to an American University and pay to hear the rantings of a tenured professor rail about Ice and Sun people.
Islam is as Islam does and Disneyfing its history and current events is counter productive. D'Souza is a respected author who got this one wrong.