The far left gets more insane with every passing week . I grow more disgusted each and every day with the arrogance lies and sloganeering. There is never a plan on how to deal with terrorism. There is even denial that there is a problem. I have seen the problem up close and they tell me it doesn't exist.
The far left fools seem more concerned with Falwell the Bin Ladden. Sorry, I can not get worked into a tizzy about tuition tax credits or school prayer. Last we checked Pat Robertson did not fly planes into office towers.
There is a deranged sickness that ignores beheadings, bombings and general mayhem. Scoring political points is more important then winning the war. Yet the second we get hit again every cook crank and creep will be pushing conspiracy crap.
The far left has been proven wrong throughout history but its adherents never learn.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
They live on Fantasy Island, where we don't face a murderous enemy. Some days I think that must be nice to have one's head in the sand. Then I remember how much I don't like sand in my eye.
Recently, Falwell chose a new dean for his seminary at Liberty University--a fellow named Caner. Caner is a convert to Christianity. Nothing new there, right? But there is something new: Caner used to be a Muslim.
What amazes me about Caner's appointment is that some Leftists (and some Muslims, too, of course) have objected. Never mind that it's really none of their business whom Falwell hires. Furthermore, I understand Falwell's choice: the orientation at Liberty Univerity is an evangelical one. What better person to reach out to Muslims than a convert to Christianity?
Now, I'm not a great Falwell fan. But one thing is certain: he's not Bin Laden, and he's not advocating anarchy/nihilism. The followers of Falwell's religion, as you pointed out, don't fly planes into buildings.
When will people learn this is not just any war this is a war of Good vs Evil. The Iraqi terrorist were defeated. It is a proven fact that over 90% of the people we are fighting now are not Iraqis. Those who are Iraqi for the most part are being forced into the action. Families threatened men handcuffed to the steering wheels of cars with bombs.
They kill innocent men, women and children to further their goal of rule by terror.
I would just like the people who are in denial of this action to tell me what street corner are you going to defend because brother if you dont wakeup and smell the coffee that is exactly what you are going to be doing.
Ooooops my mistake these people would never fight them they think that you can appease terrorist just as Chamberlin and Europe thought they could appease Hitler.
Take a lesson from history folks one day you are going to run out of food to feed the alligator's then guess who gets eaten.
Robert, I wish what you say was true – that they only difference to fighting the war on terror is one of technique.
Unfortunately, there are two groups on the left. One sees the problem and respectfully disagrees on the means. The other see the goal itself as a fabricated bogyman and our response is motivated by an evil sinister agenda.
I have no problem with those who disagree with the battle plan but I have no sympathy with those who think we are the bad guys in this war. Beak has made similar distinctions in the past as have almost everyone else here.
By the way, here's a positive report on the progress in Iraq. I enjoyed it and thought I'd share.
Rob here is my problem with the left in general. There is patriotic dissent . I do not think that Iraq is in the long term best intrest of our country. Then there is the type espoused by the Chemist Bush lied troops died BS.
Come up with a long term vision and step away from the Communists. What we basically have is Blame America first crowd.
Yep he would have voted for him even tho I tried my best to educate him not o.
Interesting, Robert, how you almost voted for Bush since I almost didn't vote for Bush.
Actually, if it weren’t for the war and the nature of Kerry’s opposition to it (which I talked about here), I wouldn’t have voted for Bush or anyone for that matter. My vote was mostly an anti-Kerry vote (which I made clear in my endorsement of Bush last November)
I understand how you feel Robert. I don’t share some of the hesitancy (or worse) towards gay marriage of my fellow Republicans. But defense was the biggie for me. If I was in the UK, I’d be voting for Tony Blair. Whoever gets defense right, gets to call the domestic agenda.
Well Grace,
I've heard about people like you.
Dim wits that believe Noam Chomsky is an expert on human rights and regular Iraqi citizens aren't quite human and don't deserve to be free. People that believe Howard Zinn is a fair and balanced "historian", and Mikie Moore is a great film maker and and purveyor of truth.
Now that I'm done with the demagoguery, that you so freely use in place of intelligence, do come back. I'm sure we will get a bigger laugh than you will.
One more thing, Grace.
I looked at your blog. You need to get a life, one with roots in the real world.
Be careful of that light saber, yah hear?
Grace
I use the force every time I step to the throne and flush. Warren has an excellent blog and is a brilliant writer.
Maybe you should take up a real hobby like bowling and get a life.
"Warren, your age is showing."
Meoow, hisss, hisss.
LOL
I wasn't blogging in September of 2001, but I raised quite a stink about Rev. Falwell's (and Pat Robertson's) remarks in my social circles and on internet message boards.
But to Robert Bayn's construed "Falwell is a terrorist because he disapproves of homosexuality" - besides the obvious earmarks of a diseased psyche inherently prerequisite in holding such a view - is a rather bold example of why the Left should be barred from any position where they might come into close proximity with someone that wields power in American foreign policy. Because to them, a "terrorist" is not a person who seeks to coerce a political view through violence, but rather "terrorist" is just a slur you slap on someone who gets queasy at the idea that some people enjoy licking feces off of each other's genitalia.
"Beamish i never called Fallwell A Terroist, Go back and re-read my post!"
"...you fail to see the war on social issues, and that is where fallwell types are the terroist."
"Your taking this statement clearly out of context."
Ah, I see. People who are "Falwell types" on social issues are "the terrorists," but Falwell himself is not a terrorist. Thanks for clarifying, I think.
...but rather "terrorist" is just a slur you slap on someone who gets queasy at the idea that some people enjoy licking feces off of each other's genitalia.
"By that quote i would have to assume your a complete idiot, if you think thats what gays do.
Well, I did leave out the part about show tunes.
Post a Comment