Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Commies and the Islamo Genocide Bit

All of us should oppose any groups that are seeking genocide. David Horowitz had an exchange with a Muslim student activist that illustrates the support for killing civilians and genocide amongst some of the so called student activists.

The far left deans did deem it appropriate to discipline this student in the usual manner. We have seen students suspended and sent to sensitivity training for far less than this. Of course when a Muslim talks of killing civilians or exterminating Jews the Marxist left fosters this for political expediency.

All this being said it is not difficult to find decent Muslims who many of you know from your daily lives. I am convinced that the nexus of Marxist and Anarchist instigation and Petrodollar monarchy dollars has prevented peace for its own reasons. These groups need Israel as a catch all evil for their own reasons.

12 comments:

Always On Watch said...

David Horowitz had an exchange with a Muslim student activist that illustrates the support for killing civilians and genocide amongst some of the so called student activists.

I saw the video of the exchange. The Muslima might well have been a convert to Islam.

Anyway, I do know some decent Muslims. I've also seen at least one decent Muslim, my former neighbor, get revived to fundamental Islam, courtesy of the Dar al Hijrah mosque.

Anonymous said...

Beak, you need to give specifics of exactly what this student said. I don't trust Horowitz. He's one of the poorest public speakers I've ever seen in my life. He's also a hysterical freak that tends to over exaggerate for political brownie points. I don't doubt that the student may be a loser; however, until we know exactly what they said, I'd hold of on simply stating that this person supports genocide.

Ray

The Pagan Temple said...

Ray-

I saw the tape. I don't recall the student saying anything directly about supporting genocide. All I heard her say is that she supports keeping the Israelis in one place, which is more than bad enough. Admittedly, there might have been more to what she said than merely what I saw.

Ducky's here said...

All of us should oppose David Horowitz.

The_Editrix said...

"I don't trust Horowitz. He's one of the poorest public speakers I've ever seen in my life. He's also a hysterical freak that tends to over exaggerate for political brownie points."

Hear, hear!

Always On Watch said...

Ray,
excerpt from the exchange between Horowitz and the Muslim woman

More on the YouTube sidebar at the above link.

The_Editrix said...

"All of us should oppose David Horowitz."

If you don't like him, he can't be all bad.

Anonymous said...

Okay folks, while I admittedly have not taken the time to google this story to the fullest extent it probably should be, I did read her supposed retraction, saying that she was confused and does not support genocide of Jews.

However, the video seems pretty clear that she did understand the question. Sure, students can get nervous in a crowd setting and such, and Horowitz does ramble on and on when he speaks, but I really think she stated her deepest beliefs, regretting them only when the she realized how revealing her words really were.

Therefore, she's scum. Her playing the victim card immediately after "apologizing" indicates that she's not sorry for supporting genocide, but simply regrets having been caught so candidly for saying something hateful that would have gotten her applause in Muslim nations.

Horowitz is no scholar, however, and I stand by my contention that he's a bigot and provocateur. He and other Neocons are notoriously pro-war while usually never having served in the military. Sure, he was a leftist hero during the Vietnam War and didn't serve. Oh, then he has a conversion experience, just in time to support war whenever possible. I despise him for his uninformed views of Native people in this country as well, when he called for the eradication of reservations and tribal governments. We all know he'd have a seizure if similar garbage were spewed about Israel, I'm sure.

Ray

The_Editrix said...

"Horowitz is no scholar, however, and I stand by my contention that he's a bigot and provocateur. He and other Neocons are notoriously pro-war while usually never having served in the military. Sure, he was a leftist hero during the Vietnam War and didn't serve. Oh, then he has a conversion experience, just in time to support war whenever possible."

I agree. My rejection of Horowitz went together with my growing discontent with the Violent Hummingbird when I started to look into FrontPage a bit closer and discovered countless intellectual dishonesties. To me it seems to be a venture to sell Horowitz' books. I believe that a liberal can have a political epiphany and see the light. It is hard to believe, though, that somebody who has once embraced a TOTALITARIAN world view will let it go. He will either lie or replace it with a different one. This would be a case in point.

beakerkin said...

First of all Horowitz does have advanced degrees from respected Universities. His books which I have read are well researched.

As far as publicity he would likely admit that publicity is part of the business. More to the point people like Norman Finklestein and Chomsky similarly market themselves with more
blatant self righteous marketing. One can probably find Norman Finkelstein brand toilet paper and Noam Chomsky boble head dolls.

Front Page is a large site and as such one can find a few oddities there. By most accounts it is far more honest and trustworthy than its critics like Michael Lerner, Fisk and Commie professors.

Yeagley is a tragic story and many of us wanted him to live up to the ideals of Bad Eagle. However, one should note the true failing of Yeagley is likely a form of mental
illness.

How one can claim to be a patriot and a Christian while failing to grasp that both concepts are egalitarian are indicative of mental illness. His conspiracy theories including crypto Jews, British monarchy and the Beatles and Islamic Beauty Queens are really better suited for stand up comedy than serious reading.

One day I expect Yeagley to just come out and tell us his writings were merely comedy bits. He should seriously consider a career in Standup. His act could go to countless casinos. So far only Charlie Hill has attempted the Indian version of Chris Rock.

beamish said...

I've always viewed Horowitz as sort of a Dr. Frankenstein, regretting the creation of a monster after it's already terrorizing the countryside.

I mean, it's nice that he's "defected" from leftism, but what about those enough who were never stupid enough to fall for leftism in the first place?

Don't get me wrong, I don't dislike Horowitz, but there's a whole list of conservative and libertarian thinkers I'd put ahead of him.

The_Editrix said...

"However, one should note the true failing of Yeagley is likely a form of mental illness."

Beak, that is terribly defaetist and relativist. Even a clinically retarded person DOES know the basic rules that prevail among civilised people and which are roughly defined in the Decalogue. Even most psychopaths do that. Otherwise, the world would be full of unbridled murder, looting and rape. I don't claim to have any in-depth knowledge about psychology. This is just borne out empirically. Do you really think that a liar and slanderer does not know deep down what he is doing? That the megalomaniac isn't deep down aware of his own inadequacy?