Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Ducky gets a promotion. He is promoted to the official Blog Troll Position

We have reviewed the list of odious nominees for official blog troll and awarded the job to the anti semitic commie poultry Ducky. We like our trolls to be manly , sneering and creative. The Duck falls short on all counts. However considering his limp compettition of Dr Smith imitators he is awarded the job by default.

Step up Ducky and let us hear your lack of wisdom. Does it take " hard work" to be the apex of ignorance on so many blogs ? When will you take the time to make your own blog or are you afraid that you might lay an egg.


Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

If Ducky had a blog, would you visit it?

samwich said...

Beamish, Beaker would LOVE to visit Duck's blog.

Top o' the mornin' to ya Beaker.

Warren said...

If duck had a blog, it would read like the "Provda" of the 1970s! If he ever had an original thought, it was strangled in the crib.

Always On Watch said...

I rather imagine Duck will be happy to see his promotion. This is a position is what he's been apparently striving for.

beakerkin said...

I think everyone should go to a Ducky blog. Hmm the title Poultry Wisdom or Bird Brained In Boston .
Has anyone seen the shake and bake Duck formula

Kyle said...

Speaking of, I will soon launch my own blog, I want it to be a little more about philosophical discussions, but I will also hit on current events. I will have only one test for trolls. Can they backup their opinions with at least some documentary evidence. If not, then CIAO.

beakerkin said...

Kyle You should have a catchy title. I was thinking of renaming this blog but it has a decent title. I was thinking Home of the Visine Republicans or when wingnuts attack but I will stay with the current title.

Mr. Ducky said...

Why thank you Beak. I do like to give the fans a thrill now and again. Was this unilateral or did the whole crew join in?

Jason ---- The sandbox libertarian who is so dumb that he gets his view of the Arab world from Raphael Patai, as I recently learned. Although the Arab countries certainly have their distinctive characteristics, the idea that 300 million people, from Morocco to the Gulf, living in rural villages, urban metropolises and (very rarely these days) desert tents, think with some sort of single, collective mind is utterly ridiculous but that doesn't stop Jason. I think Patai spent two pages on hospitality and charity, critical elements in Arab culture and two chapters on masturbation. Well, at least we know why Jason was so struck by Patai's work.

Beak ---- The professional Kahanis. The Juden Uber Alles master of the universe. I'm quite happy that I get you so riled up.

Beamish --- He is a football fan and hasn't had a creative though in several years apparently. He like Impressionism. Given his vapid personality that's no surprise.

Always On Watch --- A harmless sort with good intention as she fills her students at the charter school full of tripe. I once described my uncle's experiences during WW II and AOW was kind enough to note that she approved of his character. Typical of the American far right she was not bright enough to see that she got it wrong. He earned the right to approve of her...she has never been tested and has earned the right to shut her mouth.

Mustang --- The censor. The poor fool sitting at home singing "Freedom Isn't Free" and not even knowing he's been filled with so much crap by his marine experience that it is the world which is qualified to explain things to him and not vice versa. Unfortunatley this is also true of other vets although I have developed something approaching a liking for Big Bubba.

Farmer John --- An interesting sort. If he could let the great Books program move him past the 18th century there may be some hope.

Who did I leave out Beak? As the right wing war monger pussies start mouthing off about Howard Dean I started thinking about the efforts of the great socialist Jean Juares and his assassination trying to stop World War I. I was wondering if any of you 85 I.Q. lightweights had heard of him. Probably not although I suspect Jason is stupid enough to step in and try to blow smoke out his ass on the topic.

beakerkin said...

Poultry boy

You are entertainment and a rubber Duck. You do not have the IQ to be anything more then a comedic prop.

Jason is a brilliant writer and a personal friend. What he leaves behind in the circular office has more wisdom then you.

Beamish is also a friend and he is not an art fan. He was choking the duck so to speak but you were clueless as usual.

Always and Mustang are friends who are known for their patience. They don't do comedy so you are best suited as official troll of this blog.

Now Dance Rubber Duck and be manly.
We have plenty of trolls who are less then manly already. Remember snarling is good and whiny is wrong. The Doctor Smith role is reserved for 167. Practice sneering comriduculous.

Mr. Ducky said...

Beak, your defense of Jason is touching. Be advised that the fool finally quoted Patai a little to closely and confirmed what had been suspected.

He's a cheap Arab hater who deosn't have the juice to be overt. He needs to pick a "scholarly" Arab hating work to quote from so that he might seem erudite.
He doesn't stand his ground well at all.

beakerkin said...


Jason is a brilliant writer and friend. The Arab hatred bit is just what you Commies fall back on lets see Likudnick, Neocon , Kahanists, Fascist , Racist, Liar, Hypocrite are your standards.

One day I might even post a blog by Pseudo Duck to show how predictable and inane you are.

Tori said...

at least duck didn't post your blog on Democratic Underground like mine was...i had dozens of trollers on my blog! They've pretty much gone away, thank god!

Mr. Ducky said...

Mr. Ducky may be many thing, some good, some bad but he is up front when he trolls. Doesn't troll under pseudonyms and sticks to dirty tricks.

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...


You pose as if I'm easily discredited, yet won't step up to swing. Just answer my perennial question:

Are leftists physically capable of rational thought, and if so, why do they fastidiously avoid engaging in such in public?

Impressionism? Too Neo-Algerian for me. I like gun camera videos.

Mr. Ducky said...

Is the left capable of rational thought? Of course not, Beamish, they are genetically incapable.

You are a complete asswipe, aren't you?

Never got off the corner, did you, punk?

Cubed © said...


I hate to be a nag. . . Well, no I don't; BUT--poor Duck is a classic example of the products of today's schools.

Many of us, from the Right and Left, Conservative and Liberal, Independent and Libertarian, have experienced at least SOME damage (some more than others) in the form of "mixed premises" that are rammed down our throats.

Our educational system was seized by the government back in the mid-1800s; then, while lying helpless in the clutches of a uniform code of "one size fits all," it was infested on a wholesale level by the Postmodernists, who saw in the captive minds of our children a MARVELOUS opportunity to further their goal of "deconstructing" our country.

Duck has experienced the same thing that many Muslim children, who are, incredible as it might seem, born as normal human beings, experience under the heavy hand of Islam. The human brain is a remarkable entity, but it is not immune to every assault--either the Postmodernists' or Islam's.

Quite frankly, Duck has some interesting points to make on occasion, but they are offered wrapped in so much hostility that they are experienced like a rock wrapped in whatever he has to say that is then thrown through our windows. As a result, most people immediately reject everything he has to say--the sort of situation that gave rise to the expression, "throwing the baby out with the bath water."

By trying to make his points by using "ad hominem" so much of the time, he loses every case every time, even when he's right. Sorry--I should say "accurate," not "right."

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the compliment mr. ducky. You place my development at the very peak of Western Civilization. And so I have to ask myself, why should I follow the path of intellectual decline along with the rest of you?



beakerkin said...


The Duck is the apex of trolldom and he doesn't whine.

Ducko Beamish is not an art fan . I am an art fan and I like Renoir, Goya , Monet, Soutine, Modigliani among numerous others. You have a problem with that lets go.

Farmer John he is a cut above 167 as the Duck never plays victim. We prefer manly snarling mean trolls.

Cubed much of what poultry boy says is for effect. He knows that I am not a Libertarian but I am beging to see the light. My Rudy Wing of the GOP irritates him but Libertarians scare the wits out of the REDS. There is even a small contingent of Libertarians in New Algeria ( France) .

Mr. Ducky said...

Why should I have n issue with your artistic selections, Beak. You can't handle abstraction or the Renaissance but are we surprised?

Renoir and Monet are second shelf.

Goya and Soutine are nourishing.

I've spent hours with some of the African masks that inspired Modigliani and quite frankly the African carvers are the better artists. Outstanding sculptural command.

Beamish doesn't really care for art? Just football? How sad for him.

Interesting times in Israel, Beak. Looks like they are finally telling that asshole Netanyahoo (sic) to put up or shut up. I do dislike Sharon but at least we can say he's a human being unlike the moron, Benny.

beakerkin said...


Your banal obervations about art are noted. This is just another subject that you are a complete ignoramous.

Israel is a democracy and if the people elect Bibi so be it. They have lived under terrorism long enough to decide their own affairs.

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

Is the left capable of rational thought? Of course not, Beamish, they are genetically incapable.

Nice of you to admit it, Ducky. Perhaps there's hope for you, with gene therapy.

Always On Watch said...

Glad to see that Duck is living up to his new promotion. You folks here have had quite a day!

rapeublican said...

All we can ever be is ourselves.

What the fuck are you, a 12 year old?

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

I see Rapeublican the faggot is hitting on you Beak.

beakerkin said...

I am unfamiliar with Rapeublican. However trolls do drift in and out of here. He should be aware that we allready have plenty of trolls here. Ducky is our official troll as we prefer the manly sneering type he wins by default.

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

Rapeublican hit on me too, but I disappeared him for being gay.

beakerkin said...

Obviously Rapepublican does not read very well. He is unable to define the definition of a Rudy Republican.

samwich said...

Beaker, I don't know about rapeublican being gay. Where I have seen that term used it is always used to imply big business raping the ecosystem for profit. Like the strip mines. Or like Kennecott Copper digging away an entire mountain range, the Oqurrah Mountains, to extract the copper, lead, tin, silver and gold. The overburden is moved north a few miles and is a large corporate pile of barren desert now.

Beaker, a Rudi republican is an anti gun republican, a RINO.

Warren said...


"Beaker, I don't know about rapeublican being gay. Where I have seen that term used it is always used to imply big business raping the ecosystem for profit."

Which term, gay or rapeublican?


I just bought two new handguns at a divorce sale, a .44 mag and a .357 mag. I think I'll keep the .44 for myself but I'm going to give the .357 to my great neice as a Christmas present. I'd give her the .44 but I think the grips might be too much for her hands. Well, maybe next year when she's two years old.

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

You're going to give an infant a .357 Magnum? That's no good. A .50 caliber Desert Eagle has the proper recoil to launch her across the living room.

That is, if her parents allow her to play with guns in the house.

Warren said...

Well, I'll admit that I'm being a little selfish keeping the .44 mag for myself but that big .50AE that the desert Eagle chambers requires sufficient body mass for cycling out of that semi-auto action. Nothing pisses me off more than a stove pipe jam so I'm going to stick with a wheel gun.

What do you think about a .454 Casull? You get those same Buffalo Gun ballistics as a .50 AE in a wheel gun. A 300 grain, .45 caliber bullet at 1650 FPS, What could be sweeter?

Granted, she will be giving up 25gr of bullet and 150 ft lbs of energy, (think .32 auto), but the Casull is just more feminine and she can do some special tricks with her hand loads to make up the difference.

BTW, cousin. I hear they are making noises about banning handguns in Canada. Would you be up to helping an oppressed people and making a few bucks at the same time?


Mr. Ducky said...

The Desert Eagle .50 is heavy and inaccurate. Close quarters and the dipshit Beamish is using a .50 and missing while he's being dropped by my older but highly accurate Colt Python.

You firepower dipshits are responsible for assuming the Iraq fiasco would end with a little "shock and awe". Truly dangerous little dilettantes.

Warren said...

Ducky, you are a dipshit of gigantic proportions. My carry piece is a P90 and I practice from ranges of 10' out to 50 yards. Left hand, right hand, modified Weaver and rested at all ranges.

Shot placement is everything, the only ones that count are the one that hit the target and I doubt that you would care to be in my crosshairs even at 100 yards.

So get a grip, and a sense of humor.

Mr. Ducky said...

So you don't use the Desert Eagle, warren. Good move.

Still in a close encounter of the nasty kind I'll stick with the Python.

Warren said...

The desert Eagle is chambered in three sizes, ,357mag .44mag and .50 AE. Since both the .357 and .44 are rimmed cartridges, They tend to not cycle very well out of a magazine resulting in jams. The .50 AE is a hunting round with the ballistic characteristics of a buffalo gun, (like an old Sharps 45/90). It also is bulky, ungainly and weighs in at about three pounds.

Only an ogre, eight foot tall, could carry one concealed and using one for personal protection is like using a sledge hammer to put in finishing nails.

I recommend wheel guns for most people. They are inherently safe, at least modern ones are. It won't go off unless the trigger is fully depressed and if the round doesn't fire, you just pull the trigger again without having to clear a misfire.

I own Three .357 wheel guns and one .44 mag with a ported barrel.

That being said, I usually carry one of my two .45 auto's. I have an old PD, which is smaller and lighter than a Colt Officer model and the Ruger P90. Both are extremely accurate and I do not have a need for a spray and pray high capacity gun. Both are slimmer and easier to conceal than a wheel gun. I actually out shot one of the competition guys, at the range, using my little PD and he got so mad that he pitched his "full race" competition gun half way down the range.

The only problem I know of with the Python is that it has a tendency to go out of time and shave lead if you use it heavily. I believe that where you live, possession of hollow point ammunition is a felony, so be careful of over penetration, (if you use FMJs).

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

What "shock and awe in Iraq," Ducky? We didn't even sling infants in the air and catch them on bayonets for fun.

job opportunitya said...

Exciting blog. The site out did itself and will be
back! I love surfing the internet for blogs that are
exactly like this blog.
I hope you had a chance to check out my compare life insurance blog.