Monday, July 19, 2010

Maybe its France

There has been yet another riot in France. This last one seems to have a specific cause a death at the hands of local law enforcement. These things do happen in the USA as well albeit rarely. We place most of the blame on Muslims, but we have seen no riots in Brooklyn, Patterson or Dearborn.
The UK has had a few riots but the number is small in comparison to France. There are different communities in Frace Algerians and West Africans vs Pakistanis and Indians in the UK and USA.
There are different employment and safety net practices as well.

16 comments:

SecondComingOfBast said...

Kick their asses out of the country. Put them on god damn barges and set them adrift until they find somebody willing to take them in. Why not, it's not like we've never done it before. If it's good enough for garbage, it's good enough for Muslims?

beakerkin said...

Pagan

Why is it the riots are more frequent
in France than elsewhere.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Probably because of the laws against the veils and stuff, but I don't know that for a fact. I think the fact France has the largest Muslim population might have something to do with it too. The more of them there are, the more obnoxious they get. They are as high a percentage of the population in France as they are in India I think. What you are seeing in France, and other places in Europe, is what you will see if they get that large here.

They think being Muslim makes them better than those who are not, and they have the right to do as they damn well please. People that kill their own wives and daughters for minor infractions, even imagined ones, are people that are not to be trusted or respected.

Ducky's here said...

Pagan, they are third generation citizens.

Now, since they are Muslims, Officer Beak will just make up a history for them.

Ducky's here said...

Of course there are riots in several countries at the moment but since these are the only ones involving Muslims that's all you hear about from Beak and his bigoted friends.

You guys should report for Newsmax.

The_Editrix said...

Hellohello--- Reality check! We are talking about France. F-R-A-N-C-E!

Since May 1967, shortly before the Six-Day-War, France employed a hostile policy towards Israel and still does. General Charles de Gaulle declared at a press conference on November 27, 1967, that the Jews are an elitist people, self-confident (which means, of course, TOO self-confident) and domineering. This is still the more or less official policy in France. In every city, in the Paris Underground, Hezbollah is notably present through their advertising material.

The French will have to learn the hard way that Muslims respond to something like that not with gratitude, but with contempt.

Another factor may be that Britain's Pakistanis and Gemany's Turks were, for a while, better controllable than France's Arabs, but time is running out there as well.

Last but not least, what do you expect from a people that let during the European heatwave in 2003 35,000 people, the majority of them elderly, die. In comparison, the heat wave cost 300 lifes in Germany, a neighbouring country, and, believe me, it was hot there as well. What do you expect from a people that needed America to save their sorry asses twice in the last century and never showed any gratitude whatsoever.

The_Editrix said...

TPT, thanks for the clarification. Of course, the percentage of Muslims within a population is important as well. It is said that a society can bear as much as 3% Muslims without suffering. From Wikipedia:

4%-5% (Germany, Greece, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, United Kingdom),
5%-10% (Austria, Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden),
10%-20% (Bulgaria, Cyprus, France, Montenegro, Russia).

Of course, the large Muslim majority in Russia doesn't make itself felt as it would in Western Europe because the Russians have no qualms about the rule of law. We have to face the fact that Muslims are exploiting our own values of equality and freedom and turn them into weapons against us. So, in a way, the problem are we, not them.

The figure of 5% Muslims in Germany is misleading because there are very few in the "new federal states" (the former GDR) and as many as 30% in some West German communities, where they have virtually taken over the power.

beakerkin said...

Editrix

There seems to be something specific about France that has more of these riots occur. You may say it is the number of Mulsims. However there are places in the USA and the UK where local numbers are high with no similar riots.

France has a history of arrogance in this area and you are correct it is poetic justice. Still there is something unusual in repeated riots there.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Beak-

The French plus Muslims.

What you are dealing with here are two different people who are polar opposites, each one of whom think they are better than anybody else in the world.

That has got to be an explosive combination under the best of possible scenarios.

The question becomes not "why are there more riots in France than anywhere else", but "how could there not be".

The_Editrix said...

"However there are places in the USA and the UK where local numbers are high with no similar riots."

There are few places in a huge country like the US where the numbers are as high as in France. If Muslims would riot in Dearborn, Michigan, they know full well that they were given very short shrift by the government and get little support from Muslims elsewhere in the country.

I predict that we'll see Muslim riots in the UK soon and in Germany not much later.

beakerkin said...

I do not know if the USA has the onions to shoot rioters in this day and age. They certainly would not even think of this in the UK.

Law enforcement varies from region to region in the USA. In Texas the rioters would possibly get shot by locals before the police got there.

In Brooklyn the populace is disarmed and NYPD is very well trained. The locals are not exactly passive types. After Crown Heights local Chasidim have formed self defense groups. Contrary to the myth espoused by Farakhan local Blacks are not big fans of Muslims.

In NJ I do not see the State being aggressive. The community is concentrated in Patterson and is fairly well off. In Jersey City the locals are not intimidated by anything.

Always On Watch said...

The percentage of Moslems in the United States is not high enough for Dearbornistan to riot.

Here in the States, Moslems prefer the stealth jihad (Islamification) to outright combat.

My comment is simplistic, I know.

Ducky's here said...

In the U.S. you have to be sure the rioter is unarmed and cuffed before you right wing diaper pissers have some 85 I.Q. cop shoot him in the back to make you feel safe.

Don't look now, scary Muslims and Black people.

beakerkin said...

People who teach doodling likely have lower IQ's than the cops they trash.

When Blacks riot in the USA it is typically sparked by a specific act of injustice. As more Blacks become successful it happens less and less.

Muslims who attempted to riot in the USA would get their asses kicked. This is not the genteel 60's and contrary to Farakhan's delusions the average Black does not care for Muslims.

Riots take place only in an area where the population has fear. Americans of all stripes are pissed
off.

The reason anarchist turds wear Black is that the locals would kick their asses so they hide in the crowd. I would love to see commies start something. The American people are sick and tired
of your kind.

Obama has destroyed the left for perhaps two decades or more.

SecondComingOfBast said...

"Obama has destroyed the left for perhaps two decades or more."

Which is EXACTLY the reason they say he's not leftist. The worse Obama does, the more "conservative" they claim he is. At first, he was center-left, before too long he was center-right. Now he's starting to be downright conservative to hear Duckie and others tell it.

If Obama fucks up any worse, Duckie will be swearing he's so far to the right we should expect him at the next Tea Party convention.

The_Editrix said...

"My comment is simplistic, I know."

Whatever, but you are right on the mark.