There is an anger in this land over the Obama administrations forcing a health care bill that is not wanted by the American people. There are death threats to congressmen and an over whelming anger at an arrogant administration that does not respect the will of the people, our traditions and the Constitution. There will be a series of lawsuits by the states.
The Obama administration is taking a gamble that explaining the bill will defuse some of the rage and anger that will cause his party to lose seats. Similarly, there will be a rush to do immigration reform now before a tidal wave hits in November.
The economy is a wreck and we have a tin eared clown whose sole constituency is University Marxists and the Bolshevik Big Media.
There will be payback in November. Don't get mad or break the law. Merely get even with politicians who stabbed the American people in the back to please University Marxists.
Medical Professionals should mobilize and strike. Let Obama and his Bolshevik buddies explain why your doctor doesn't like the plan.
Also those upset about my friend Sonia, let it be known her wanton ways have influenced the great American patriot to go topless. Mr. B decided to lose the sacred gas mask and some of us are wondering if he was inspired by Sonia.
Of course the above is not true. However, many of my peers who are serious bloggers have enjoyed the posts as Sonia's blog. Mr. Beamish, Mustang, Steve Harkonen, Jams, American Crusader and the Pagan Temple have been there at one point.
I also want to thank the Pagan for his pun in my response about not seeing the forest for the trees. He responded he isn't thinking about trees, his mind is on bush.
I am not a prude in any description. As a bachelor, I have dated women from many races and cultures. Those of you offended by miscegenation are in the wrong place. In my community the term implies to those who date non Jews. I do not lecture other people about their morality and find those who are offended by miscegenation to be unamerican. In the case of one minor pundit who is a product of miscegenation and then critical of it this rises to circus freak fare.
As for gays and lesbians, it is their lives. I like most consider it to be a private matter between consenting adults. I oppose job discrimination and have witnessed people say things about gays
that would get them fired if said about Blacks. There is never any excuse for using slurs about gays, just as we don't accept the N word we should certainly not call people Dykes and Faggots.
There are claims by certain women at work who would report you for the slightest bit of rhetoric
that they find sexist or racist to posses gaydar. Even more comedic are claims from others of this ilk that employment in certain vocations infers homosexuality. This is especially funny coming from someone who has never worked in the fashion industry lecturing a person who was there for over a decade. Some male models are gay, but there are plenty who are not. The fact is gays
work in almost every vocation and you probably run into them in your daily mundane life and it is no big deal.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
"Medical Professionals should mobilize and strike."
Don't doctors swear the Hippocratic Oath in your country?
The Obama administration is taking a gamble that explaining the bill will defuse some of the rage and anger that will cause his party to lose seats.
BHO will be trying his campaign "magic."
Will it work this time?
Well, there will be plants in the audiences so that the media can spin a positive reception to ObamaKare.
But this time, I don't think that WE THE PEOPLE will be fooled.
November 2010 cannot come soon enough.
I agree with you that amnesty will be the next do-or-die legislation.
Gotta get those new voters, because Americans are mad as hell right now.
Freedom of Speech taken to a new High or is it Low?
It started with calling someone a "Nigger" and Spitting....not too much was said. Then "Baby Killer"....not too much was said....escalating to threatening E-mails, and phone calls and threatening family members, no telling what has happened in the past few hours.
Sarah gets on the bandwagon with "DON'T RETREAT..RE-LOAD" and offers a map of U.S. with places to target with rifle cross.
Ann Colter with her usual flair, when asked about transportation from a seventeen yr. old Muslim college student about not allowing Muslims ride airplanes, told her to take a Camel! Well they told her to take a hike, now she wants to sue them. Seems she can damn sure dish it out, but can't take it. These are the darlings put out front to incite.
Civility doesn't mean a thing to some people like Palen, Colter, McCain and so many other talk show hosts, all they know is defiance and incite.
These types claim President Obama incites just because he is "Black" because he REALLY IS CIVIL. He is not the usual "ANGRY" Black man, he is CIVIL. Though he has had every right to show his anger, he knows that is what most republicans want.
I give you yeagley, a wannabe Indian, to dress up and use for your tea party! Everything is relative, full circle, white against white now.
Yesterday... I did hear a big round of applause as a speaker mentioned Native Americans, mentioned ever so briefly...I strained my ears, but heard no more said, as brief as it was, it was a thrill. Our own Oklahoma Leaders don't even mention the Native Americans. Maybe its best with the way things are going, we're doing fine.
CM
Obama just looks like he's not inciting to the people he's blinded.
Michael Reagan signs off his radio show with,"Keep your head down and your powder dry". Does this make him a revolutionary? Is he inciting violence? NO! But the left wants to paint it that way so they can seem to be taking the high ground. When one is trying to preserve what the Founders envisioned one isn't a revolutionary any more. Then one is a counter revolutionary taking flack from the Left who are the ones subverting the Constitution. Hence the keeping of the head down and the powder dry, so you don't get shot through the "window", and so one can fight another day.
When you hear on National TV, the "LIAR", "BABY KILLER" and "TAKE A CAMEL", see people throw money on a protester that has to sit on the sidewalk because he can't walk and hear them tell him he is on the wrong side of town if he is looking for sympathy, get off his behind and get a job! When you see the derogatory signs and hear the hate in the speeches, its in your face. So when the next step is an actual shot thru the window, no one will be shocked will they, its all becoming all to common....and I don't care what color these people are, its all too common now days. Some won't be here to fight another day, you will have to take up their arms for them.
What did the Founding Fathers invision, the original Founding Fathers, I mean the Wasp? What was their vision?
You can read about it in such documents as the Federalist Papers, The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
As to the prior founding fathers, who knows what they stood for?
Ann Coulter has a right to be as acerbic and sarcastic is she so pleases. She is not the one limiting the freedom of expression according to the First Amendment. The actual physical violence has historically come from the Left, not the Right, so that is why I find it so hypocritical to hear Leftists complain of language that, according to them, has run afoul and is beyond the pale. Give me a break. The threat of violence is what cowed the Mounted police to cancel her talk. As Ann says, a Leftist could give a talk at any conservative assembly without the need for a bodyguard, but a conservative needs one to just give a talk at any N. American college campus. Why is that? Ask yourself that question and then get back to me on that.
Whats "N. American college"?
The woman needs a body guard at all times no matter where she speaks, of course she has the right in the U.S.of A. but she was given the rules for this Campus and she got offended. Rules are rules, I'm sure they pertain to all speakers.
For sure her reputation proceeded her, and its their right to lay out the rules.
CM
Dionysius said... Ann Coulter has a right to be as acerbic and sarcastic is she so pleases. She is not the one limiting the freedom of expression according to the First Amendment.
Mark, Coulter has no First Amendment rights in Canada. And, as a visitor to Canada, she, like any other Ernst Zundel impersonator, is subject to Canadian hate-speech laws.
The actual physical violence has historically come from the Left, not the Right, so that is why I find it so hypocritical to hear Leftists complain of language that, according to them, has run afoul and is beyond the pale. Give me a break.
If we're talking about Coulter here, the only threat of violence was someone was going to hit the harpy with a pie. The whole threat of violence story was worked to the max by Coulter and her promoters for (gasp) publicity. Which worked out rather nicely, because they had to get a bigger venue for her performance in Calgary.
The threat of violence is what cowed the Mounted police to cancel her talk.
Nothing "cowed the Mounties", it was the promoters of Coulter's trip that cancelled the show.
As Ann says, a Leftist could give a talk at any conservative assembly without the need for a bodyguard, but a conservative needs one to just give a talk at any N. American college campus. Why is that?
Conservatives are too mature to throw pies?
As a matter of fact, it is the Left that is prone to act out their ideological differences with pies (and/or riots). Just ask David Horowitz about that if you doubt me. Civil discourse or pies. The Left chooses pies. Pies or shouting so loud you drown out the speaker. It must be that these Leftist students have no confidence in their abilities when it comes to framing a rebuttal. Civil discourse, Canadian style? But no worries, it happens all the time at the Leftist controlled American Universities too. I think they take their cue from the Leftist Labor Union strong arming mussel men of yore.
And I agree with you, it certainly does appear that there is no First Amendment or any right resembling in Canada.
http://theblogprof.blogspot.com/2010/03/free-speech-ann-coulter-canada-talk.html
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=2727750
When conservative ideas can be labeled hate speech then all you will have is Leftist "Progressive" Liberal speech. Are you and advocate of that, Mac?
And her body guards no doubt conferred with the police presence there in making their determination that the crowd was too raucous to risk it. She would have preferred to present her conservative ideas rather than get publicity she doesn't need.
And now, why is anybody even talking about what little there is of Tea Party incivility, as if it's a one sided question? When a Tea Party gathered at the Mall in DC there was no need of a trash clean up after the event. The million man march or the celebration of President Obama's inauguration required a caravan of trash trucks to clean up after the slobs. At least one could say that jobs were created I guess. This is an indicator of the differences between the Conservative and the Liberal.
Canadian hate-speech laws!? Well, I guess that depends on who's speech one is hating, now doesn't it? The Canadian "freshman" students hated Ann's speech before she even gave it. This is call peremptory and/or preemptory law enforcement, I take it?
This is the same reasoning used in banning Michael Savage from Britain.
Balderdash!
Beak, I responded to this thread, have you missed okaying my comments?
Mark said...And I agree with you, it certainly does appear that there is no First Amendment or any right resembling in Canada.
Well then, it appears to me that you can't manage to do the most basic of internet searches. In Canada, freedom of expression is guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights. Thing of it is, whilst we have the freedom to say what we want to, we are held responsible for that which we say. So, in Canada, entertainers like Coulter can't really get away with hiding their bigotry behind what they refer to as "satire".
Mark said...When conservative ideas can be labeled hate speech then all you will have is Leftist "Progressive" Liberal speech. Are you and advocate of that, Mac?
Don't fecking pontificate to me about conservatism. I happen to live in a country that has a stable, popular, conservative government. You don't. And the truth of it is, your brand of conservatism has caused such a blight on conservatism in America it can be held directly responsible for the first black president, and, by extension, socialised medicine.
There's your conservative legacy, pal.
Mark said...And her body guards no doubt conferred with the police presence there in making their determination that the crowd was too raucous to risk it. She would have preferred to present her conservative ideas rather than get publicity she doesn't need.
Spare me the bullshit, Mark. That anorexic harpy is a media whore. "Publicity she doesn't need"; what a laugh.
Mark said...This is the same reasoning used in banning Michael Savage from Britain.
Never heard of him. Sorry, Mark, your political entertainers don't really interest Canadians all that much. Well, except as oddities, maybe. Thus Coulter's impressive two or three stop tour, where people came to stare and toss pies.
We use hate-speech laws to keep people like George Galloway out of Canada.
Beak, can't you install a Blogger widget like "Recent Comments" in your sidebar? Otherwise, great contributions like Mac's comment from 3:24:00 PM at this rather elderly thread will very likely go unnoticed.
Another thing: Your friend "Winters" isn't just an Internet slob, a troll or an evil clown. He is a seriously nasty bit of work. If you don't show for once some guts, he will destroy this nice little forum and that is exactly what he came to do.
recent comments widget
Cateran said...
Mark said...And I agree with you, it certainly does appear that there is no First Amendment or any right resembling in Canada.
Well then, it appears to me that you can't manage to do the most basic of internet searches. In Canada, freedom of expression is guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights. Thing of it is, whilst we have the freedom to say what we want to, we are held responsible for that which we say. [In this case she was held responsible for what she MIGHT say.} So, in Canada, entertainers like Coulter can't really get away with hiding their bigotry behind what they refer to as "satire". [Coulter speaks at the leading conservative venues. She is highly regarded by virtually all the leading conservative American thinkers. Cite an example of her bigotry if you can. Do it.]
Mark said...When conservative ideas can be labeled hate speech then all you will have is Leftist "Progressive" Liberal speech. Are you an advocate of that, Mac?
Don't fecking pontificate to me about conservatism. I happen to live in a country that has a stable, popular, conservative government. You don't. And the truth of it is, your brand of conservatism has caused such a blight on conservatism in America it can be held directly responsible for the first black president, and, by extension, socialised[sic!] medicine. ["Responsible for the first black president"? That could be taken as a bigoted way to phrase what I think you meant. Tell us about the Canadian socialized medical system. Or, better yet, dispute this article if you can. http://www.theadvocates.org/freeman/8903lemi.html Conservatives didn't elect Obama. The Left as been gaining power for some time now. The balance of power has been going their way of late. Add illegals to the voting mix and they will be in possibly for generations.]
There's your conservative legacy, pal.
Mark said...And her body guards no doubt conferred with the police presence there in making their determination that the crowd was too raucous to risk it. She would have preferred to present her conservative ideas rather than get publicity she doesn't need.
Spare me the bullshit, Mark. That anorexic harpy is a media whore. "Publicity she doesn't need"; what a laugh. [How many NYT best sellers has she had. She appears regularly on Fox and at various high level conservative gatherings around the country. Most all of the leading American conservatives endorse her views. It's usually social secular liberal progressives masquerading as conservatives that have a problem with her, if not Socialists using strong arm tactics to stifle debate.]
Mark said...This is the same reasoning used in banning Michael Savage from Britain.
Never heard of him. [Second leading syndicated conservative talk radio host after Rush.]Sorry, Mark, your political entertainers don't really interest Canadians all that much.[Since when did you start speaking for all Canadians? Savage has a large following in Canada.] Well, except as oddities, maybe. Thus Coulter's impressive two or three stop tour, where people came to stare and toss pies. [Leftist militant students came to shout down and intimidate a stanch conservative with veiled threats with the approval of a few enabling Leftist professors and college administrators.]
We use hate-speech laws to keep people like George Galloway out of Canada.
[First you compared Ann Coulter to Ernst Zundel and now you are implying that she's no different that a George Galloway. Qualitative comparison is not your strong point it seems. Ann Coulter is no more acerbic a conservative than The_Aviatrix and you now it, Mac. As far as I'm concerned we need more of them. Let me fill your boots for YOU, Dipstick.]
3:24:00 PM
Post a Comment