Wednesday, May 03, 2006

The Introduction To the Black Book of Communism

We have read with amusing the rantings of John Brown and the duplicity of the Duck over a book neither have read. The introduction explains that Communism has escaped the scrutiny of Nazism. The book compares Nazism to Communism not to rehabilitate Nazism but to point out the criminality inherent in Communism. Moreover in a case of projection genuine Communists gloss over their own crimes while attempting to stigmatize Zionism and patriotic Americans. A Commie screaming at the top of his lungs about the alleged crimes of zionism is a comedic spectacle to the educated . One of the reasons Commies need to harp on Israel and every imagined ill in the USA is to cover up their own history as a genocidal movement and that of apologists for a series of crimes . We would be rightly excorsized about real Nazis and Klansmen airbrushing histoty in our Universities. However we have a cottage industry of revolutionary couch potatoes who produce zero genuine scholarship, hire cronies , are exponentially over represented . These goons readily talk of old boys networks in the private sector but feign ignorance at any mention of an Old Bolshevik club in academia.

Crimes against humanity originated as a reaction to the Armenian genocide (pg 6). The author speaks of crimes of Racism at Nurenberg. There certainly were wholesale ethnic deportations and engineered famines against troublesome ethnic groups like Ukranians. Most of us are familiar with Jews in Cattle cars sent to concentration camps. Few of us are aware of Balts, Poles, Chechens, Tartars and others sent in cattle cars to Siberia where many died right away. Thus we have the spectacle of our own John Brown complaining about imaginary Israeli genocide while defending a system that put Moooooslims in cattle cars and sent them mostly to Siberia and Khazakistan to die. The communists also added a series of class enemies merely being a Kulak was a death sentence. Communists had deportation quotas that were fed to them from the top. Thus members of the nobility, middleclass, clergy and military officers found themselves deported only if they were lucky and most often in front of a firing squad. Nor were the Russian examples uniquethey are readily found in China, Cambodia, North Korea and elsewhere but you will have to read the summaries or buy your own copy of the book.

There is also the crime of agressive war and the creation of satalite states. The Nazis did not invade Poland alone. Their ally Joe Stalin invaded Western Poland and the Baltic states and held their own series of small scale massacres eclipsed by the larger Nazi ones. The wars end found much of Europe trading Nazi Hegemony for Communist Totaliarianism and brutality.

Yet in the West there has been a dedicated cadre of flat earth type true believers that are loathsome to most of us and probably comedic to Felis who lived in one of these fantasy Commie Worker paradises. The book explains the secrecythat Communists employed there were not mounds of pictures and much of the crime took place on the fringes of the world. Yet even today John Brown dissmisses Communist genocide as fiction and Ducky complains about shameful use of Gulag victims to discredit Communism. I wonder if the Duck would ever make a similar statement about Nazism and Holocaust victims. 167 plays another game in that he claims Zionist stole the Holocaust to create Israel and plays down 6,000,000 dead Jews while hyping 25,000 dead homosexuals. That number if true might represent 2/3 of the gay population of Berlin and Hamburg and if any group has over emphasised its victimhood in the Holocaust it is likely his own. For the record profesional researchers have struggled to find 1,000. This is not meant to disparage gays but point out the incohernce of an actual communist who approves of Capital punishment for gays in Iran and Saudia Arabia while screaming about Tookie Williams.

The Author points to the cadre of Western Flat earth types attacking early witnesses to Commie crimes. Most of those on the left who complained were branded Trotskyites and treated as apostates. The term Trotskyite is often flung at apostates like David Horowitz, Ronald Radosh and amazingly Stephen Schwartz. There were Trotskyite critics but the term was abused much in the same manner Neocon has become evil Joooish weeeepublican.

Communists have a history of perverting the language. Chinese gulags were called reeducation camps and inmates students. The gulags were described as rehabilitation and trips to the countryside. Soviet and Cuban regimes also placed dissidents in mental hospitals. In the case of Cuba homosexuals were placed there but 167 still will not say a single vowel about Cuban abuses of Gays.

Thus today we have a dedicated Communist like John Brown calling liberal Republicans, liberterians and Conservatives Klansmen. He does this while repeating Norm Finklestein and Chomskyites lines about Israel and both have a history of collaberation with genuine Nazis Holocaust deniers. We have Brown crying about a multi racial democracy as aparthied while ignoring real aparthied next door.

We have the Duck claiming that there is no such thing as Communist Front groups. Thus groups created and led by Communists and including Communists are not Communist
only if one is bird brained. Kagan, Jodi Evens and Medea Benjamin have lengthy histoties as Communist. Joel " Deranged" Kovel and Norman " Holocaust Denier" Finklestein can call themselves Greens but their history and support of Communism and far left activity is known. Chomsky uses the term Anarchist but his record of support of communism is also a fact.

Communist call Cuban trained thugs in Central America freedom fighters while railing against Contra terrorists. Genuine people blowing up public transportation and dance clubs are called freedom fighters and Israel's attempts to kill terorists who hide among civilians is termed terrorist.

Make no mistake when dealing with Communists like John Brown, Weasie, 167,147 and the Duck we are dealing with advocates and enablers of criminality just as evil as Holocaust deniers. In the case of Communists they go through contortions and word games to hide their crimes and bigotry.

Communism fell without a fight so we never had the spectacle of a Nuremberg trial for Communists. Thus the faithful were able to cling to fantasies of idealistic victims of McCartyism and of an independent Communist party that did not engage in espionage and Suberverion in the USA.

Thus we begin with Chapter one of the Black Book of Communism straight ahead. I am still the charter member of the Visine Republican wing of the party it gets the Reds out and sterilizes them as well. In the case of 167 his lifestyle makes sterilization
pointless.

Mr Beamish in 08, Ducky in Denial, 167 paying to play Abu Gharib naked twister in London, Socrates to improve the world by leaving it and John Brown to undergo a labotomy and improve his social skills.

50 comments:

Jason Pappas said...

Kita Ikki? It is always amusing when Ducky tries to separate fascists from socialists as if there was more than a superficial difference. This is an old commie ploy. By creating a false alternative they hope to omit the real choice: capitalism (the liberal order, constitutionally limited democracies, free markets, or whatever you want to call it.) Nice try Ducky. Of yes, I know you’re not against capitalism; you only want to regulate it beyond recognition. We get your drift!

But why you still can’t come to grip with communism’s legacy without minimizing it by exaggerating any faults of ours is still puzzling. Even my childhood new left friends understood that communism failed.

Jason Pappas said...

“Laissez-faire capitalism failed.” Not quite but I have no trouble uniting with moderates to preserve the core of our great economic system even if they don’t agree with my aspirations. Why harp on it? You seem to think the core of our nation is sinful and our “shit stinks” as much as the next guys (to quote a pungent Ducky rhetorical outburst.) Why the cynicism? This is a great nation and our influence in the world is far better than any of the alternatives in the last 100 years.

I still say someday Ducky is going to wake-up and realize that he’s lying with the wolves and not the sheep he’s dreaming about. Then he’s going to become a neo-neo-conservative. Sure, he’s not going to be partial to my type of libertarianism. Nor will he embrace Beamish muscular Republicanism. I picture Ducky as a hand-wringing neo-conservative like Bill Kristol. Or perhaps an on-again-off-again anguished conservative like Andrew Sullivan. Yes, that’s it. Give it up Ducky; you don’t want to sit on the same bench with genocidal communists.

beakerkin said...

In the words of the Beloved Ronald Reagan there you go again.

What does Japan have to do with Communist Genocide. In fact what do the Armenians and Nazi episodes have to do with Communist genocide.

This is part of the shell games Communists like Ducky play. They project the evils of their fetid system onto Isarael and the United States.

The numbers in the book have not been discredited at all. They may in fact be way too low.

Ok Ducky do Communists front groups exist. Why do Communists need so much secrecy in the first place. It is because you are apologists for a failed system that only excells in producing Genocide and oddly Cheap alcohol.

Way to go Ducky.

John Brown said...

Still talking shit.

Still refusing to post Nazi apologetics.

American Crusader said...

Has any other form of government killed so many of their own population as communism?
Stalin alone killed approximately 20 million..14.5 million of those starved to death, another million executed for political offenses.
Another 10 million were exiled, deported or killed in work camps.

Under Mao Tse-Tung, between 14 and 20 million Chinese died of starvation during the "Great Leap Forward".

John Brown said...

Still talking shit.

Still no fascist apologetics posted.

What's the deal, Toady?

American Crusader said...

ducky...just curious, why has China introduced capitalist reforms such as private property, free markets and even agricultural privatization?

nanc said...

may day, may day - first article beamish'.

beakerkin said...

JB

Are you going to raise a point or do you wish to be aborted. You have not come up with anything relevant.

FYI I think you should remove the familiar blogs from the Klan watch segment. Some of these people you have labled are not white. Jews are a target of the Klan and the Klan repeats much of your material.

John Brown said...

I'll take you off, Toady, because you've decided not to censor me.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to read your fascist apologetics.

Can you provide your faithful readers with a timeline as to when we can expect to see Chapter 1? I can't wait to really examine the sources!

beakerkin said...

You claim to have read the book so go to the back. Your coments about Warren have been aborted.

You may insult me politically but racial stuff and the name for Nanc must go.

nanc said...

beak - your surprise is ready.

John Brown said...

Why don't you stop spouting words and give your diligent readers a timeline?

A week ago you were talking all sorts of smack about posting your little fascist screed... why don't you do what you said you'd do?

Or, after taking a look at the rag, do you know what's coming?

nanc said...

if he'll knock it off i'll knock it off - i've already addressed this issue at beamish'.

beakerkin said...

JB

I have a challenging job and the chapters contain vital info. The time line is when I can but it is starting. The chapters contain plent of information and they also get Beaker additions.

beakerkin said...

I just don't get it IW. He has gone from Blog to Blog wanted nowhere except Weasies site.

I understand Weasie is trying to build an audience. I can not figure Brown out at all.

Jason Pappas said...

Don’t be silly Ducky, a socialist economy is one where the government owns all property and controls production and distribution. This is incompatible with individual choice. Ownership is control. Either the government makes the choice or individuals make the choice.

Of course, you can have a mixed economy such as Sweden’s welfare state. It’s socialism, capitalism, or a mixture. A free market means free to own (i.e. control.) And government control comes at the expense of individual control.

It is a logical impossibility to have X done by socialist policy (government choice) and have X done by individual free choice. X being an act (produce, distribute, or consume.)

beakerkin said...

Jason

The growth rates in Europe are proof that European style Socialism doesn't work either. Fools try to repackage Marxism but it is a failure in all forms .

beakerkin said...

JB

Has removed me from the Klan section and replaced me with Iran Watch this is ominous.

Any Comedic justice dished out to JB is waranted.

Jason Pappas said...

That’s a partially socialist economy where the government is elected. To some extent we have a social democracy and to some extent individuals are free to act and choice as economic agents.

Look, Ducky, you obviously don’t what a completely government determined production, distribution, and consumption where everyone would be told what job to take, what goods are theirs, etc. You’re not a complete socialist if the world is rigorously defined. But then again so are the vast majority of Americans between one extreme and the other.

Sure I’d like them to be less socialist and you’d like them to be more socialist. But I don’t see a vast degree of difference between America’s economy and England’s, Germany’s and even Sweeden’s. At least the difference isn’t vast as compared to a libertarian order and a totalitarian order. On the complete scale of libertarian to totalitarian from 0 to 100, were a 42 and Sweeden is a 57 … to pick rough numbers.

I think the differences in philosophy between you and my friends on the right are bigger than the reality. You're really a closet Sullivanian Republican. Admit it!

FLORIAN said...

Right on Beaker. Communism has done more damage to mankind than 20 nuclear bombs on 20 capital cities could even hope to do. 100 million plus dead, countless "re-education" camps (or gulags), wealth envy on a scale never before seen, a promotion of laziness, declarations that God is "dead" or never existed. In reality it kills the human spirit, it destroys the mind, halts progress (though they promote it as "progressive"), and fuels rabid anti-semitism. But don't tell that to Mr. UU.

beakerkin said...

Jason

No way the Ducky is just a well mannered Marxist out to Nationalize your property with a smile . Communism= theft

FLORIAN said...

Didn't Ducky get banned from FPM too?

beakerkin said...

Florian

The Duck got banned from FPM but has decided to dwell in our community. I was told to reregister but as I did nothing wrong I will not return. Plenty of good people got banned but most reregister.

I will dwell here . My trips to FPM were few and far between. Hank Snow actually comes in with a snide remark and flees. I was the first to leave FPM for blog life and many were sceptical but I never regreted it.

John Brown said...

Capitalism = exploitation of labor

Exploitation of labor = theft

Only when the producers control their product will true economic justice exist. In order for that to occur, we must expropriate the expropriators.

beakerkin said...

Communism = theft of resources
Comunism = man playing god + piles of bodies

Invested Dollars + risk = Jobs and efficient distribution of resources.

Starving people to liberate them into death is not a good idea.

Social Justice is a commie code word for theft. Life isn't fair and if thirty people sit at a table a variety of skills and abilities exist.

You can not recreate man or markets to suit your crackpot ideas of utopia that fail every time and produce nothing but death and bigotry.

What is it you want Brown. You have obviously figured out that most sites do not want you type of post. The problem isn't the content as much as the vulgarity.

You are more likely to get readers at Weasies. If you are spoiling for a fight you might be onto something.

At best you end up proving my points and are a mere minor inconvenience. Obviously you see by the wide lattitude Ducky is given the problem is not dissent but tone.

I only reluctantly censor posts with epithets. The exception is a poster named Socrates who is a pedophile who will be censored forever.

What are you looking for ?

Dan Zaremba said...

Green Part of Australia is mostly commie.
Soon after the collapse of their benefactor and paymaster USSR the communist parties in Oz dispersed and regrouped.
Initially they gathered around Nuclear Disarmament Party but it collapsed (funding).
Then they jumped on Green bandwagon and they managed to get a few of their “persons” into the Senate.

Jason Pappas said...

No way the Ducky is just a well mannered Marxist out to Nationalize your property with a smile .

I don't even thing Ducky wants to nationalize corporations. I think his radical bark hides a moderate bite but his emotions get the best of him. I could be wrong. He thinks all those horrible things didn't happen or didn't happen for the reasons we believe. Perhaps if he did ...

Dan Zaremba said...

Beak,
Check out this book if you haven't already.
Jung Chang and Jon Halliday, Mao: the Unknown Story

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

LoBrow,

Why would Beak write an apologia for fascism? He's not a leftist.

FLORIAN said...

Hey John Brown! Didn't you die a traitor's death back in the 1850's? How fitting since you believe communism gives the government the "right" to own everything we the people work hard for. Guess you'll have a dandy time convincing the so-called poor of America to give up their bling in Big Screen TV's, fancy cell-phone's, and $1000 rims right? The poor in America are poor for a reason. Bad attitude, wreckless decision making, inpetious understanding of consequences, and a complete lack of self-control. Capitalist America is the only place in the world where a peasant in India can become a millionaire in a matter of years. No wonder we have millions of illegal border jumpers!

FLORIAN said...

Sounds like your on to something there Kyle. Could it be that most leftists are closet commies? Dennis Prager made a similar observation today on his show, except the example was Christians. Why is it that most liberal Christians are pro-gay, anti-war?

Dan Zaremba said...

Kyle,
Right or Left made political sense some time ago (the end of the 18th Century).
In fact they originally referred to the seating arrangements in the various legislative bodies of France.

Nasism and Fascism are probably on the RIGHT of the radical ideologies/movements.
Radical - supporting, justifying violence to achieve goals.

Conservatism doesn't like the use of force or as per definition any sudden, drastic changes.
Conservatism is opposed to radicalism.
Two entirely dfferent planets.

Anonymous said...

Florian- As a Christian, my view is that those leftist Christians are into a touchy-feely gospel, they believe in a different type of utopia! They can't believe that a loving G*D can possibly keep anybody out of heaven! Even Satan will be saved in the end! They cannot see tough love as healthy, they cannot understand that taking a tough stance on crime brings dignity to people! They are so focused on here and now, they have forgotten G*D's other attributes, justice, purity, perfection, so they water down HIS love and mercy. They forget WHO they are dealing with and make HIM one of them. As such they do themselves and others no good, they don't see that the G*D of the Older Testament is the same G*D of the Newer! It is actually seamless, they have blinded and deluded themselves! They don't discipline thier children, then don't understand why thier children go astray or become self righteous little prigs! They also believe that those of us that take a more holistic view of G*D are unloving pharasees! Oh well! They obviously don't believe in personal accountability, which opens them up to use by the true communists.

tmw

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Now I will grant for the sake of argument that Fascism is extreme right wingness (actually an Ayn Rand society would be).

Kyle, you could grant that, but you'll be just as dead wrong as every other mindless leftist twit.

Fascists are leftists and always have been.

John Brown said...

florian,

I expect people on this list to defend slavery and attack Black people. You should get more creative if you're wanting to set yourself apart from Nazi apologists and COINTELPRO enthusiasts.

You're a defender of the ruling capitalist order's right to plunder and exploit the world.

And, as is customary of a Klansmen, you use racist stereotypes to justify exploitation, murder, and displacement of the same people who you're shameless government scattered throughout the country like dust after Hurricane Katrina to spacially deconcentrate an entire city.

Anonymous said...

What racism? I don't see no stinkin' racism.

tmw

Freedomnow said...

Brownie,

You just said that, "I expect people on this list to defend slavery and attack Black people."

I have never seen such behavior here, you are just making that up as usual.

As soon as you open your mouth about Hurricane Katrina it becomes obvious that you are pathological liar...

John Brown said...

Sure thing, Freedomnow.

I expect that White Supremacists such as yourself would want to avert their eyes from the most flagrant display of how capitalism on Vanilla Sam's plantation treats the most oppressed of all its myriad oppressed nationalities.

In the eyes of the White Supremacist, its always better to blame the victim than seriously analyze the cause of injustice and depravity.

John Brown said...

Especially when that cause is Whiteness.

FLORIAN said...

Oh I see! So John Brown has a problem with "white people". A-HA! Now who brought up race again? Read my post again Brownie-this time very slowly word for word. Where do I talk about race or racism?
I can see your education and comprehension level are far below the average person's. Are you a hurricane Katrina refugee?

Freedomnow said...

You have got to be kidding me. You call me a white supremist? Some hispanics consider themselves white, but I dont.

I never even lived in a white neighborhood until my twenties.

Go Fish...

FLORIAN said...

Freedomnow are you hispanic? I'm Spanish. Where are you from?

Freedomnow said...

I'm Puerto Rican.

beakerkin said...

What is this fool Brown talking about ? The Klan doesn't welcome Jews either . Warren , Beamish and Nanc are all part Native American.

Nobody spouts more stupidity then Brown. Let me tell Warren what a failed philosopher said about Native Americans. Native Americans do not need a follower of a failed genocidal crackpot to tell them about anything.

Warren said...

I still think its funny!

An obvious nut-job, telling us "mudpeople" how we are all racists while using racial epithets and calling us Klan members.

Get over it, nut job, or JB or JSB or whoever you are today. You are the only one around here "pure" enough to belong to the Klan, "or" be a Nazi.

You are such a totally ignorant dimwit, how did you get that stupid, huffing spay paint?

So as my Cuz would say "Kiss my mudpeopled ass!", be sure you wipe that nasty mouth first. Y'all here!

LOL

Did you know that JB goes around begging for readers?

Ck this out
Posted by John Brown:
"As do I... an invaluable resource from a brilliant critic of Empire.
savagejustice.blogspot.com
"

That was from a cached page at radio.indymedia.org

A self styled "brilliant critic", gag me with a spoon! On his blog, he has imaginary conversations with imaginary posters congradulating himself on his imaginary "brilliance".

Quit, quit, I'm going to pee my pants!

ROTFLMFAO

Warren said...

Beak, You forgot to add I'm a Roman Catholic.

The Klan was formed in this area because of anti-Catholic sentiment. Several Catholic families were burned out and buisnesses were burnt to the ground at the turn of the last century.

FLORIAN said...

In Spain the Catholic church has a festival where the priests/monks all get dressed up in Klan-like robes. Ironic isn't it?

Warren said...

Yes Florian, most assuredly.

But I believe the Catholic church has seniority in its choice of garb! LOL

Anonymous said...

Warren, my Mother was RC, she remembered driving with her family after church, with 2 nuns in the car, out in the Finger Lakes area of NY. They saw a burning cross on a hill, her dad turned around and fled the area! With 2 nuns they would have been toast!

tmw