Wednesday, February 03, 2010

A very small man indeed

I want to point out with some amusement that the attempts by some to claim opposition to the AMREN conference is communist is amusing. This attempt by Johny come lately Cold Warriors who dedicate little of their time and space to anti-communism is amusing.
Any look at this blog indicates this is something we need not explain.

Communists like the folks at AMREN like to divide my nation into groups. AMREN by race and commies usually by class. That being said commies are prone to agitate racial grievances when it furthers their agenda and defend racist states like Cuba or slaughtering Indians when convenient as well.

Americanism is about individualism and all our rights are individual. My country has no second class citizens. Race is a mere attribute like height and shoe size.

This conference does include Holocaust Deniers. A true visionary would never sit in a room with such people in the first place. However, if the opportunity was there a larger man would take the opportunity to confront this type of historical malfeasance. This crowd has not exactly been fond of mixed race people or specifically Indians. Why a mixed race person would wish to speak in such a forum is beyond belief.

That being said Dr Yeagley for all his faults is not an anti- Semite and has spoken out loudly and in clear terms about Holocaust Denial. My point is that he fails to grab the true essence of the nation he loves. Oddly, these same people would deprive
the planet of future Dr Yeagleys because he is the product of a biracial union. In an odd twist of fate he has joined ranks with those who saw certain people as less worthy either from a racial or lifestyle issues. This is almost Shakespearean in its irony.

28 comments:

Ducky's here said...

So as long as you don't consider him a Holocaust denier it doesn't matter what other crap he spreads?

CM said...

Beakerkin,

yeagley sure likes to give links to information for all to read and most of it is against the AMREN..he is one cold hearted strange little man!

I know you consider him a friend(?) so I hope they don't hurt him physically. He takes attention anywhere, anyway he can get it. This is NOTHING new to him, this is his life, the life of a White Euro man....taking, raping, scavenging, using us just like days of old from the Real Indians....I don't mean this to include all white people, just the yeagly types. I hope he gets all he deserves from this strange happening that keeps moving its location to an un-disclosed location. He really needs a body guard for his little old self with a big Head!

I recommend the two TS's!

CM

FJ said...

...race s a mere attribute like height and shoe size

LOL! Tell that to the EEOC and the Title 9 NCAA enforcers. Tell that to the corporate "diversity" czars.

What "should be" and "what is" are two different things entirely.

AMREN is a REACTION to the progressive social justice purveyors and their perpetual ressentment campaign.

CM said...

Beakerkin,

Can't be any worse than his joining forces with the BAG!

Of course, this AMREN event was his freedom of choice, the other is hers to own, he has no say! That is clear.

I read where the Sioux are freezing and dying on their reservation, little children and Elders with no heat, water, food. Yet she jokes about the Comanche Elders freezing, we are well taken care of by our Tribe and other Tribal People of Oklahoma pitched in. Elders and Children should not be used as a JOKE! yeagley encourages her...like I said cold heart. He belongs with the WASP founding fathers who no longer exists, leave the Indians to the Indians.

CM

The_Editrix said...

"So as long as you don't consider him a Holocaust denier it doesn't matter what other crap he spreads?"

Beak, the Duck makes a good point here!

The_Editrix said...

Beak, sorry, but you are an arsehole if you ever grace that cesspit with your presence again:

"Are you sure you know what American Renaissance is? Are you sure you know what each person connected with it stands for? Have you presumed a unity of purpose?

Are you going on hearsay? Are you going on what the opponents “call” it? Do you know of any opponents who are not Communists?

What do you think the American Renaissance stands for? You do have a clear idea?"


Don't you see it? He is PATRONIZING you! That pig ignorant fraud of an Indian, of an academic, of a pundit and of a man, who is unable to read (and understand) a book in its entirety and who isn't worth your spit is actually PATRONIZING you! He who drools over the alleged spiritual quality of the Jews thinks that Jewishness, in your case, isn't anything special. (Mind you, I don't share that view, I am just pointing out the incosistency of the dolt who makes up his shit as he goes along so that it fits his agenda.)

And he says so himself:

"(Frankly, I can’t say I do. Just a general impression. And besides, going and speaking to them does not constitute supporting every thought of every person there. I hope to educated, and also to be educated in some respects as well."

"Just a general impression!" He hasn't got A CLUE! Just "a general impression" that they are racists and therefore kinda okay.

Let him go! Let him attend and enjoy the thought of how many times he will be shunned or people will wash their hands after shaking his. Not because he is a pig ignorant gut-feeling sensual racist, a fraud and a follower of that ridiculous Ellen-White-SDA-cult, but because HE IS NOT WHITE!

Frankly, the thought gives me enormous satisfaction! That may not speak for me, but I will have to live with it.

The_Editrix said...

"Why a mixed race person would wish to speak in such a forum is beyond belief."

But he says it himself. It's like Quanah Parker and his hot baths. It's just not his white blood of which he wants to rid himself, but his Indian blood. Forget that self-hating monstrosity.

Ducky's here said...

Hey Beak, GayEagle.com is lusting after white women again.

He's hot for Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann (gag) and the harpy who runs Atlas Shrugged.

Someone needs to tell his fag hag Betty Boop that he's back in the closet.

The_Editrix said...

"Oddly, these same people would deprive the planet of future Dr Yeagleys because he is the product of a biracial union."

Nobody who does that can be all bad. Sarcasm off. There are two different aspects: First, are you seriously saying that a world without Yeagley would be POORER for it? And second, how can you still respect a man who champions people who think that there is no place for him on this earth?

"Race is a mere attribute like height and shoe size."

You are an idiot, Beak. What conclusion, pray tell, do you draw from the fact that from a pool of 0.2% of the World's Population (Jews) come 17% of Nobel Physiology and Medicine Prize laureates or 11% of Nobel Physics Prize laureates? Hint: There is NOT a hidden, dark and sinister conspiracy behind it. Do you really think there is nothing in between Yeagley's disgusting, sensual racism (I'm sure he is stroking himself while he is writing that crap) and an airy "race doesn't matter any more that shoe size"?

Now THIS is priceless:
"Sarah Palin is a thousand times more fresh, and more bold, than Bill O’Reilly. I say again, one simply has to read her life story. She stands so tall, and so alone. She is an authentic American, more than most could ever hope to be. A natural American. She is not an ideologue, or even terribly articulate when it comes to political positions. That’s precisely her strongest point. She is not a politician."

That "conservative" dumbo favours a woman who has traditional and Christian values such as reducing her husband to the role of a grinning moron as part of her entourage, who accepts the possibility of one of the most high-profile jobs on earth while having an infant at home, a woman who lets her teenage daughter get pregnant because she wasn't there to supervise her. That woman is hypocrisy personified. And why does the idiot favour that woman as a politician? Because she "IS NOT A POLITICIAN". Yeah, right! Just like he thinks he is particularly qualified as a pundit because the last thing he is is -- a pundit. He unanimously and from a great height declares that the world is flat.

Tragedy101 said...

Hey! Editrix, The_! What? SDA is not a cult!

Just because I'm a cultist, doesn't mean I belong to a formally recognised cult.

Do you realize how hard it is to become a formally recognised cult?

That guy who writes that book, you know, "Kingdom of the Cults," threw us out as not a true cult; after further examination of our actual teachings. It's more like "early training" for cultists; "The Springboard into Cults"; "How to form a cult"; Cults for Dummies".

beamish said...

You're one frightened little gay child, Ducky. Everyone you disagree with is somehow "gay." Why is that? Is it because the charge stings you too much?

David Yeagley derives sexual pleasure from dousing his genitals in another man's fecal impactions while listening to show tunes? Really?

I have no opinion of Yeagley pro or con. Never struck me as particularly important to form one.

But I doubt he's gay at all.

Especially not as gay as a "film buff" who attacks a woman's appearance because he can not contend intellectually with her ideas.

beakerkin said...

Beamish

I do think Yeagley enjoys show tunes.
However, I do not think he is gay.

CM said...

Batty ann has claimed him to be gay...many times! I never read where he disputes her!

I don't think he is Gay either, but he loves no one but himself, he uses the word LOVE too loosely, it means nothing.....Brrrrr cold blue blood.

CM

The Pagan Temple said...

I've come to the conclusion Yeagley likes these AmRen folks because he thinks he can be a big deal with them. He would like to be recognized as a scholar, and also achieve a huge following as as a blogger or a pundit, but he's kinda figured he's not going to be the next Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly anytime soon. These people give him the chance for some degree of recognition and approbation that he can't achieve in general terms.

His latest post, about Haiti, is a real hoot. If I didn't know better, I'd swear I've inspired him to try his hand as a satirist.

The_Editrix said...

"Hey! Editrix, The_! What? SDA is not a cult!

Just because I'm a cultist, doesn't mean I belong to a formally recognised cult."


Oh for Heaven's Sake! What would YOU call a belief system that peddles a woman with a head trauma as a "prophetesse"? A woman who teaches that blacks are the outcome of an amalgamation of man and beast? Not to speak about her other wacky "visions". I don't give an aviating fornication whether it is a "formally recognized cult" or not. "Cult for dummies" is just the perfect description, considering a follower like the Violent Hummingbird.

The_Editrix said...

"I have no opinion of Yeagley pro or con. Never struck me as particularly important to form one."

You have no opinion of somebody who says something like "The darkness of the Negro has always repulsed other races" or (after one of his countless hateful rants against "Negroes") "See how they've infected our minds? How they dominate any view of any subject? This is disgusting at this point in American social history. . . I'm actually serious about this business of blacks having to be the center of attention, the center of every conversation, about anything" or "And American Negroes today always think their experience in slavery was the worst . . . That's only because their skin is the darkest"? Obviously, the host of this blog finds Yeagley sufficiently important to thematise him. So what is your statement worth? You can always stay out of the discussion out of respect for the host.

The_Editrix said...

"However, I do not think he is gay."

Come off it, Beak! You see as many pictures of gorgeous, sweating, muscular (and always not quite white) masculinity only at openly gay websites. What straight man would get his lace panties in a knot over a hunk like Rudy Youngblood and post countless adoring pictures of him? He is a textbook case of a homosexual with his general misogyny, coupled with an a-sexual adoration of a certain type of woman, his excessive (for a man) interest in the male physique and his projecting accusation of everybody and his pet ferret of being homosexual.

I just went there to find another one of those automatically generated ads for "interracial gay dating". Why do you think they pop up? Because he delivers the keywords.

Just go there. He has just put up another one of his hateful rants about "Negroes" and "white Christian women".

CM said...

Editrix,

I remember now when I first posted or started to read, batty ann would call me and I remember telling her I was shocked at some of the things that came up when I clicked on. Viagra, and enhancement and men on men. She acted like she never saw them, she said "where, where, where" ...but I wondered about that too! He even brings up Rudy youngblood up still!

I wonder why he NEVER blogs on the White Morman man who moved to Canada from the U.S. I forget how many wives he had but I think he had his latest baby that made his children 121. Now...yeagley speaks of the animalistic Black men, I think these men with mulitple wives is far worse than any Indian or Black that has more than a few children, even if it is out of wedlock. Yes the baby was a beautiful pink, but a caggle of young an older wives with all these chickens is unchristian. Yeagly choses to ignore this because they are mulitplying the White race, nothing about all the sins, like he does with the Mexican, Indian and Black. OOOOOH, I could slap that skinny face, maybe one day I will.....

Well...I'm off to another day of volunteering at our Comanche Commnity center, still many people without electricity and heat. I have everything on again, sooo spoiled to want the neccessities like water, heat and a roof. I was teasing a friend, "I said your supposed to be Real Indian, now how to survive". He said, "well that damn tree fell over my drive, and I was ok, I had heat, but dang when I ran out of Dr. Pepper and cigarettes I had to find a way to town".

I'm gone......

CM

beamish said...

Editrix,

All I know about Yeagley comes from his days of blogging on FrontPageMagazine's old "Moonbat Central" anti-leftist blog. I've not followed him since.

Those quotes you cite are somewhat inflammatory on the surface. Not sure I'd want to delve further into the context of them for mitigation at first glance.

Not sure I'd rely on Google ads to determine anything about any site. Back when I first started blogging, Google ads was placing pro-Kerry and pro-Democrat campaign contribution seeking ads on my blog, two things I most assuredly would not endorse, so I removed Google ads from my blog.

If he actually is gay, my (limited) experience with his writing doesn't scream it the way say Andrew Sullivan or Ducky's does.

The_Editrix said...

"I remember now when I first posted or started to read, batty ann would call me and I remember telling her I was shocked at some of the things that came up when I clicked on. Viagra, and enhancement and men on men. She acted like she never saw them, she said "where, where, where" ...but I wondered about that too! He even brings Rudy youngblood up still!"

I missed all that, CM. I remember that I had already left when you joined the Violent Hummingbird. I know that Betty Ann is irredeemably vulgar, but that amazes even me. Yeagley lets her do the dirty work while keeping up his "gentlemanly" appearance. He pimps her and the pimp is more despicable than the whore.

I think one can talk legitimately about race in a matter-of-fact, respectful manner. But with Yeagley it's all sheer, putrid hatred and all about sex. One doesn't need to know more about that man than the fact that he considers the threat to penetrate a woman with a broom handle quite alright in the context of a "stimulating situation". He is a textbook case of a woman-hating fag. It's all there, including the demanding mother.

What straight man would waste his time on the sexual aggression and physical appearance of "Negroes", let alone post pictures of gorgeous, sweating, semi-nude non-whites in lots?

The_Editrix said...

TPT: My thoughts exactly!

The_Editrix said...

Mr. B., you say: "All I know about Yeagley comes from his days of blogging on FrontPageMagazine's old "Moonbat Central" anti-leftist blog. I've not followed him since."

That was before his mother died and my theory is that she kept him at bay and that she was "Bad Eagle", the writer whose thoughts we all found interesting at one point in time. Not that the old lady was actually pounding the keyboard, but she put the thoughts in her dumb son's head and she kept his worst wackyness at bay. I don't even think she ever had a look at the actual website and I have a hunch that she would have had very little time for vulgar Betty Ann.

When Yeagley showed his true colours we all felt betrayed AND we felt something like shame because we had allowed ourselves to be fooled by him. In the end, he was just laughing stock. I was the first to go, then I saw my friends the Scots go through the same stages. I bet Yeagley thinks that I made them leave as well. Far from it. Now Beak is starting to see the light, but he is the only one of us ex-Yeagley-ites, at least that is the way I perceive it, who SERIOUSLY thinks that he can change Yeagley. And because I hope I can convince him that -- no -- he can't, I'm still here.

You are right, the sexual orientation of a person isn't of much importance, or at least it shouldn't be. But if homosexual orientation (and probably the preference of black males) is the only sensemaking explanation of a "pundit's" foetid, hate-filled rants, then it is legitimate, even necessary, to discuss it.

You are Beak's friend. I really think you are not helping him if you marginalize his concerns. He feels betrayed and he has a right to be taken seriously in that. Thank you for your kind reply and I am sorry I came on so strong first.

I am amazed that the Duck makes snide remarks about gays. Usually, those leftists are terrifically PC.

The Pagan Temple said...

Leftists hate closeted homosexuals, the same way they hate black conservatives. You know the ones they call "Uncle Toms". It's no surprise they would call someone they considered a closeted homosexual a fag. For one thing, it's a way of marginalizing them to a conservative audience.

Cateran said...

CM said... "This is NOTHING new to him, this is his life, the life of a White Euro man....taking, raping, scavenging, using us just like days of old from the Real Indians....I don't mean this to include all white people, just the yeagly types."

Your disclaimer at the end notwithstanding, I take offense to your comment. I happen to be a white Euro man, and neither myself, nor my family has ever done any harm to your people. I’m an immigrant to Canada (I also have lived in California), and my children are first-generation Canadian. That being said, I think I understand, that from your point of view, it was white-skinned people that brought your peoples to their present state - but when things come down to skin colour alone, then we have brought the conversation down to where this AMREN group wants it.

So I'd like to clarify something for you, from a white European standpoint – there is not one of we white Europeans on this website that thinks of ourselves as "white". I know, I did a straw poll on the topic a while ago.

We describe ourselves by our race, and not by the colour of our skin. In fact, I never even knew what it meant to be white until I lived in San Francisco. I learned at a church-run summer school, no less.

To me, "whiteness" is all that is left after generations have washed away the singularity of the races you all hail from originally. And before anyone takes offense to that, I'm a grandfather, and so I'm watching the process happen.

This mythical white race, it doesn’t exist. Well, except in the minds of fools and megalomaniacs.

The_Editrix said...

TPT: Thanks! Excellent analogy and it makes perfect sense to me.

CM said...

Cateran

Of course your are right, I am speaking of yeagley who writes about and praises the "WHITE RACE" supreme.

I may be a fool, yeagley fooled me into believing he supported and loves the Comanches after all, but as an Indian giver, I give the title of MEGOLOMANIAC to yeagley, he fits that like a glove.

I thank yo for your views and I accept them with eyes and mind wide open and honor them.

CM

Cateran said...

CM,

I'm glad you've understood that it's not you that I take issue with, rather it's the idea that there is such a thing as a "white" race.

There may be many races that are white, but they've never been unified, and never will be unified. Truth of the matter is, they enjoy killing one and other far too much. And any highschool student is aware of that.

Whites, and I'm using the word to refer to European whites here, are extremely bigoted towards one and other. If they don't dislike each other because of their individual races, they'll hate because of religion. And religion is the worst of the bigotries, because it crosses racial lines too.

Take it from me, I knew how to sort out Catholics from Protestants, by their last name, before I was five. There's all manner of ways to pick out an "enemy" from a sea of white faces - his accent, his community, the fitba' (soccer) club he supports, or, of course, the church he goes to. Ask Nora how many different sorts of Germans there are and what she thinks of the Poles and the Slavs.

This idea that there's a white race, and other "lesser" races, is a North American concept. Both Canada and America, has over their histories, put a value on people of different races due to the colour of their skin. The root of the whole things lies in the history of slavery.

It's what comes out a man's mouth that's important, not the colour of his skin.

*getting down from soapbox*

CM said...

Cateran,

What you state is similiar to the different Indian Nations. I can tell the Kiowa, Apache and Comanche apart. One Nations will claim they are superior to others. Comanche took the Kiowas under our wings after they were run out of the Black Hills and now they claim all our Traditions cloths etc. as theres now, LOL, its a standing joke amongst us.

Suvess(looong time ago)the Nations all Honored the same thing the, Great Spirit(their word for the one who takes care of all), now they are Catholic, Baptist, Methodist etc. I think Politics separates families more than Religion. Most Indians...any and all Nations, here in Oklahoma gather together at Pow-Wows as ONE, and celebrate as ONE. Its Politics that separates and creates enemies(at least for a while, we usually get over it!) Another dreaded "Whiteman" thang, learned and used instead of the Bow and Arrow!

CM