Anti Communists need to have their own fashion response to the tacky Che shirts and moronic kefiyahs that are symbols of Joo killing. What better symbol of anti communism is there than the ever stylish Panama hat accompanied by the classic Mr Beamish gasmask.
You can be the bane of all those whimpy commies not named Che Sponge Bob by showing up at a so called Peace protest in a Panama Hat. Commies are not known for their bravery and one or two folks dressed up like Cubans or Mr B should send them running of to the local Starbucks and then back to a high paying non job in some university gulag.
In actual tests Commies in Union Square do flee at the sign of a Panama hat. Perhaps the correct attitude when dealing with commies is to say "We are all Cuban Americans".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
That, or fly in a couple of planeloads of Cubans from Miami...that would be fun to watch!
Panama hats, cuban sandwiches and cigars, you could put up a couple of booths too, that would drive them up the wall...heheheheheh!
Good morning, G*D bless and Maranatha!
tmw
What better symbol of anti communism is there than the ever stylish Panama hat accompanied by the classic Mr Beamish gasmask.
The perfect outfit for voting in November!
Hey Beak, the human s**tbag Rabbi(LMAO) Meir Kahane wore a yarmulke. Does that mean all Jews wearing yarmulkes are terrorists?
I don't think so but your logic may take you there.
I'm assuming your referring to the Rachel Ray flap where the fat Likud pantload Debbie Schloessel didn't realize Ray wasn't wearing a kiffayih (I have a blue one) but a Cambodian krama.
I am struck by how little the right knows of the world.
We will crush you...
Oh yes we can!
The bougesoisie and proletariate will rise and push the unwashed vanguard into the mud. Obama! Obama! Obama!
Every communist leader, from Lenin, to Stalin, to Mao, to ME, Barry O, has been a sincere Marxist who has taken great personal risk to reach his position. There is nothing wrong with the mettle of people such as myself. We are not opportunists or ambitious careerists, but people who risk everything for revolution. The problem is in the Party method which leads us down the path to the restoration of capitalism. Of course, the initial leaders will not restore capitalism. Rather, it is typically the next generation, men who joined the party to be successful and not to change society at great risk to themselves, who are utterly corrupted. Perhaps something could be done here but not allowing any members into the party in the years when the Democratic Party is in charge of society. Still, it is clearly not the case that because someone when joins the Democratic Party in adverse circumstances, there is nothing wrong with that person or that because of that they will never seek to profit from their membership of the Democratic Party, that will in short never change. People are made by their material conditions, we should remember: in adversity people may want revolution, but then in comfort they may well want to protect and expand their privileges.What of the other characteristics of left communism, the eschewing of parliamentary politics and of trade unionism, the refusal to compromise with non-communist forces? Lenin is I think right to criticise such opposition on the basis of 'principle'. As long as communist parliamentarians and trade unionists serve as delegates and don't begin to administer capitalism, then there are gains to be made by the selective use of parliaments and unions. I accept all of Left-Wing Communist support except those who claim that the dictatorship of the proletariat and the dictatorship of the Democratic Party are not one and the same thing (the Italian left communist tendency incredibly thinks this is the only thing about the critique that is correct!). Ultra-leftism may a matter of dogmatism in principle, but refusing to get one's hands dirty, of not making obvious distinctions between the vanguard party and the class it leads, is suicide. Lenin was right in "What Is To Be Done" to criticise spontaneism, to claim that spontaneous ideology is bourgeois ideology, the background ideology. Lenin's famous line from What is to Be Done?, "The spontaneous working-class movement is by itself able to create (and inevitably does create) only trade-unionism, and working-class trade-unionist politics is precisely working-class bourgeois politics", simply repeats Lenin's opposition to spontaneity per se. Spontaneity is not enough to make revolution, Lenin claims, I think plausibly. It takes lying. It takes cheating. It takes sewing disinformation and posing as a middling bourgoisie. We need deliberate, considered action to make revolution. We need deception! All levels of organisation and direction of the DNC must be encouraged in producing the dictatorship of the proletariat. However, it does not follow that that dictatorship (me) can be identified with the dictatorship of the vanguard party. Indeed, it is not problematic that the Democratic Party should be the vanguard, the leading element of the revolution; what is wrong is for the Democratic Party to constitute not as the vanguard, but as the General Head Quarters of the revolution. As every soldier knows, the fuckers at GHQ are bastard cowards. That's not to say there shouldn't be a GHQ, but its should be made up of recallable delegates of the soldiers themselves.It is the absence of a majority of the democratic delegate electoral structure that meant that the proletariat was not in charge in America under the Democrats, and thence in every other country that has gone communist on the Leninist model.
Barry's Changes,
Will you make gasoline cheap enough for Mexicans to drive up here for work?
They won't have any need for gasoline or work when I'm done.
Barry's Changes,
But you're not done, so in the meantime, how do we make gasoline cheaper? Mexicans have one hell of a commute, you know.
Who's this tool beakerkin? One of Renegade Eye's friends again?
Go post you stinking manifesto's at your own freakin' blog, BARRY!
mr. ducky, you really need to stop hanging out with the riff-raff down at the Green Dragon. I would have thought you might have gone a little more upscale by now.
Ducky at the Green Dragon?
That's a laugh, the stupid little limo-socialist is still acting out because he couldn't get the scholarship at Moscow U to "study" cinematic propaganda.
Warren-There would have been 1 of 2 reactions; either he would run out screaming for the 'redcoats', or he would have stayed to try and make the agenda more 'progressive'!
Good morning, G*D bless and Maranatha!
tmw
Post a Comment