I have taken the opportunity to thank many for helping me understand the difference between
faith in a friend and reality. Many of us have friends that we know are not perfect. I want to talk
of why I decided to part ways with Dr Yeagley.
I also want to differentiate between what is fair criticism and what is not
Many of you have conveyed similar disillusionment with the Doctor who remains clueless. He sees the critique as an anti Yeagley conspiracy. I see it as talking to a friend who has fallen off the path into antisocial behavior.
Yeagley has a great gimmick with much potential. An Indian thinker who celebrates traditional values and American patriotism. If he had better vision he would have become a media star. He is a genuine scholar with wide array of interests. Personally, he is likable off line and you really do want to believe in his potential.
I stayed for close to five years. Over time disenchanted Bad Eagle types approached me. I stuck by the Dr. I spent so much time dealing with the never ending armies of Joooo haters that I did not read the other sections except when a friend like Kidst or Winters among others was writing.
The army of Joooo haters never ceased and Yeagley never once waffled. His patience was perplexing and he deluded himself that insane types can be reasoned with.
I want to thank the Editrix, Mac and the other former site members for conveying accurately what they saw. Especially important were the words of Pagan Temple and to a lesser extent the Duck as objective opinions.
The final straw for me was his post The Hated White Race that has shown up on every racial supremacy site. As a writer the Doctor understands the power of words. His hostile race based critique of Obama repulsed me.
Many of you know the wonderful people at this site who are mostly Conservatives. However, our
brand is the big table of equals. We do not have second class citizens period. Blacks are equal in every aspect as full citizens. When we disagree with Obama it is on ideas. When we agree with Walter E Williams, Thomas Sowell or Julius Lester it is on ideas.
Many idiots at Bad Eagle are questioning my partiotism based upon my view of Civil Unions. Sorry, but those who question my patriotism include racial supremacists, Nazis, 9-11 Conspiracy kooks and Elmer Fudd style antisemites. As for the charge I am a "radical son" in the Alinsky mode. I am honored by a comparison to a brilliant author David Horowitz. Unlike Horowitz I was never a Marxist. I was always a fervent Cold Warrior who voted for Reagan based on support for the Contras. The Duck who is a friend of sorts and has been trading barbs with me for six years knows my views on Communism. I battle them tooth and nail in a take no prisoner style. Many Conservatives are genteel and want to banter with commies. To me, as anAmerican they are evil
and should be denaturalized if they break the law. The folks at Code Pink who gave money to our enemies in Falujah should have been tried and ofered the choice 20 years in jail or denaturalization and a permanent bar from the United States. Peaceful dissent is quite different
The critques of Yeagley and their fairness
1) Yeagley isn't an Indian. He is an Indian as the product of a mixed marraige. He is free to define himself as he chooses. Richard Poe, Stephen Schwartz and Jaimie Glazov all had one Jewish parent but chose to portray themselves differently. Products of a mixed marriage are free to do so or even identify with both. Julius Lester, was raised in a Christian home and sees himself as a Jew.
Where Yeagley does get this mixed up at times is he misidentifies view points. When I address him on law it is from the American perspective and as a person trained to work with laws. All of us wear many hats when I discuss politics with Farmer John I understand individualism. Americanism celebrates the essence of the individual. Our rights are individual, but Yeagley seems to miss this.
2) Yeagley is an antisemite. This is 100% false. He has way too much patience for the most perverse forms of Jooo hatred. He thinks such a malady can be reasoned with. For the most part
the extreeme antisemite is either mentally disturbed or a communist. Mental Illness and communism often are comingled.
3) Yeagley is a racist.
On one level as a man with conventional proclivities beauty is subjective. There is a decent man in my office who is very into Asian women. So Yeagley is not racist for stating a personal preference for white women. If we all liked the same thing people would be lonely and boring.
His contention that race mixing creates a degradation of beauty is interesting. Lynda Carter, Mariah Carey, Phoebe Cates and Sakma Hayek are products of people with mixed ancestry. Yeagley is also the product of such a union.
The article the Hated White Race and the Obama posts are ample proof. If Yeagley were wise he would look at the words of Gator, the Editrix, Mac and many others and consider his looking at his values.
Racial supremcy and American Patriotism are incongruous. A real American like Mr Beamish, AOW or Elmers Brother has zero patience for this. In fact all decent people ranging from Jams, the Editrix, Mac and so forth do not endorse this
4) Incoherence and the John Birch Society. Yeagley is a paid speaker for the John Birch society.
The John Birch Society has pointed to communist involvement in Civil Rights groups. However,
any discussion of AIM is off the table. Would he brush aside a querry about the NAACP similarly.
5) Yeagley is a homophobe. This is an unfair criticism. He is a traditional conservative who is has religious views of scripture.
Onto the last part. Yeagley has a parasitic follower named Batty Ann. She is atthis site more than I am. We did not publish her screed against CM. She is atthis site more than I am. A check of my sitemeter shows she is here an average of ten times a day.
Many of his foes would have gone away long ago had Batty Ann not created more hatred. She is directly and solely responsible for the Yeagley is gay material.