Friday, June 18, 2010

Asking for a beating

In general the concept of free speech is a good one. However, it doesn't always infer that it is the wisest option or prudent. There was a near riot in the UK provoked by Muslims taunting returning soldiers. The crowd reacted angrily and much of the focus was on the EDL. However, it is not certain that all of those who were annoyed had anything to do with the EDL.

The EDL is easy to hate as it appears to be made up largely of soccer hooligans who seem to be more in love with beer than anything else. I would like to point out that throughout the history of the USA there have been movements against immigration. However, with the small exceptions of organized crime and terrorists most immigrants do try to live in peace.

The Islamo fundamentalist caliphate goons and their collectivist mentality are going down a dangerous path. If they proclaim any troops on "Muslim land" is an attack on all Muslims. Then the converse of collective guilt of Muslims for 9-11 is applicable. This is not logic I would care to go near. I also want to point out the notion of Iraq as "Muslim" land is interesting because Assyrians who are persecuted lived there long before Islam.

In the USA we are lucky because our immigrants are largely from Latin America, Philippines, China and India. Other than some predatory drug gangs and organized crime most of the people who come here share our values. The exception to this are the communists at Larazza who preach violent revolution. I did enjoy a recent video of communist mendicant Ron Gochez taunting Cubans. Gochez was there on top of a huge hill with a bullhorn shouting slogans with a Cuban flag with an image of Argentinian incompetent butcher Che Guevara. The Cubans climbed
the huge hill tore the flag. Had Commie Gochez not been protected by the police he would have been deservedly tarred and feathered. There is something twisted about commies who call cops "pigs" being saved by cops. The irony is lost on Gochez who as a commie is ignorant by definition.

7 comments:

Ducky's here said...

This is not logic I would care to go near. I also want to point out the notion of Iraq as "Muslim" land is interesting because Assyrians who are persecuted lived there long before Islam.

----------------

However, in fine Gay_Eagle tradition you confuse religion with ethnicity.

Is that the type of lame logic you use? Save it for Beamish or Gay_Eagle or some other 85 I.Q. mouth breather.

beakerkin said...

Here we go again with the Communist
Duck showing his ignorance. Muslim extreemists talk of Muslim land. In fact this land is colonized and the indigenous people including Jews and Christians are treated as second class citizens in lands they are indigenous upon.

The Duck as a communist is Ok with ethnically cleansed states and Jim Crow so long as Muslims are the masters.

The Duck thinks history starts in 1948.

The Pagan Temple said...

Ducky-

Assyrians are almost exclusively Christians, as are the Chaldeans. Iraqi Arabs should be run out of the Assyrian-Babylonian homeland, and those two ethnic groups should be given their own rightful state back. They are far more deserving of a state than the "Palestinians" ever were, or ever will be, and the same goes for all Arabs who dwell outside the Arabian peninsula.

May the day come when all Arabs are sent packing to their one lone rightful homeland. Get their asses out of Iraq, out of Syria, out of Egypt, and everywhere else they have invaded and genocided, like for example, right now in Darfur.

The day I cry over an Arab being killed by a Jew or anybody else is the day I pay one hundred thousand dollars for one god damn Snicker's bar.

beakerkin said...

Pagan

The Duck sees Muslims as victims of Jews and Christians. This is as absurd as seeing American slaves as victims of plantation owners or Native Americans victimized by settlers.

For the Duck populist Jew hatred and a common alliance with theocrats are needed for revolution. All lemmings follow Chavez off the cliff of sanity.

The Pagan Temple said...

"This is as absurd as seeing American slaves as victims of plantation owners or Native Americans victimized by settlers."

I think you meant that the other way around didn't you Beak? Incidentally, it was more of a two way street between Indians and settlers. It would be more concise to say Native Americans were victimized by American politicos, but even then, it was the French and British that got that ball rolling.

Whatever reason there might have been for initial hostilities, it was The French and Indian War, and later on the War of 1812, that poisoned American and Indian relations for more than a century, and on . Of course, its not exactly politically correct to point that out, but there it is.

beakerkin said...

Pagan

It is not politically correct to say this about Native Americans but
I will. The current mode of thinking of Native Americans as innocents just swept up in events is at best misguided.

From the earliest encounters the Hurons placed the French in the middle of their fight with other tribes. This is not to say or justify the crimes against Native Americans.


The notion that the Native American
was a passive player in the history
around them is wrong. Many Indians acted in their own self interest. It is not politically correct to point out that Joseph Brant was a lackey of English noblemen. However, he led his people into a war and bet on the wrong side. Not only did he bet on the wrong side
there were indeed plenty of attrocities commited.

Yet America forgot its Oneida allies who should have been treasured. Land that was set aside
was sold until 32 acres remained.

Certain Indians just remained in place and married locals and just
went on. The Abenakis of Northern Vermont just appear to be locals.
Longterm readers are aware that the
deceased Northwind was one of those
French Abenaki mixes.

Lost in the story is sometimes Indian leaders did make dreadful choices. Brant picked the wrong side and led his people on brutal raids. The Americans wanted Indians
to sit this one out.

Always On Watch said...

The EDL is easy to hate as it appears to be made up largely of soccer hooligans who seem to be more in love with beer than anything else.

To a certain extent, yes.

However, the members of the EDL are the ones in closest contact with the Islamified areas of England. Things are ugly in those areas, i.e., Birmingham, Luton, etc.