Monday, May 14, 2007

How does one divorce themselves from their own history

All movements are judged by the history of its adherents. Nazism is judged by the actions of its adherents. How do we begin a discussion of Nazism without any discussion of agressive warfare, the Holocaust and eugenics. Would we permit a person who wanted to resurect Nazism without discussion of those points, of course not.

Renegade Eye is livid as I pointed out he shares a common philosophy with Stalin, Mao, Fidel, the Black Panthers, the Red Army groups and so forth. The fact is that Communists attempt to play the bait and switch game. They like to pass the history of the USA and Israel under a microscope but wail if their own philosophies are placed under similar scrutiny. For example hos does a defender of Fidel Castro whose prisons practice genuine torture pass judgement on the events of Abu Gharib? How does one demand the extradition of Posada to Cuba without acknowledging Joanne Chessimard. Moreover, how does one demand to send someone to a country without an independent judiciary that practices genuine torture.

Renegade is proving my axiom about the totalitarian nature of Communists correct. One can look at this blog or on the very blogs he is crying about and see comments directed at me "masturbates to pictures of Daniel Pipes, practices wife beater logic". He is upset because I called Troutsky a simpleton. Sorry, but one can see plenty of insults tossed at me, only I do not cry.

One can see similar remarks by Communist on this blog uncensored. We have no need to censor Communists as their remarks speak for themselves. We have never censored a single comment for a personal attack.

9 comments:

Ducky's here said...

Beak, we must protest because Capitalism maintains control not just through political and economic coercion, but also ideologically, through a culture in which the values of the bourgeoisie became the 'common sense' values of all. Please read comrade Gramsci on the matter.

Ducky's here said...

"How does one demand the extradition of Posada to Cuba without acknowledging Joanne Chessimard."

Beak, Comrade Assata Shakur was railroaded by COINTELPRO. Forensic evidence indicated she had not fired a weapon and medical testimony indicated the right median nerve had been severed and that could only happen if she were shot with her hands raised.

Of course a black comrade with her hands raised would have been considered a legitimate target in the 70's (and still is unless your that black dutch broad).

Under cross-examination at Comrade Shakur's trial, the corrupt cop admitted to having lied in his reports and in his Grand Jury testimony about the other corrupt cop yelling and showing him an ammunition clip, and about Shakur shooting at him from the car.

Freedom for Revolutionaty Comrade Shakur.

Farmer John said...

No, you didn't use the 3-syllable "S" word? No wonder they're pist!

sonia said...

Personally, I prefer to condemn today's leftists for their support of Chavez rather than for, as you've put it, 'sharing a common philosophy with Stalin, Mao, Fidel, the Black Panthers, the Red Army groups and so forth.'. Once upon a time, I also shared a common philosophy with those mass murderers. So I am as guilty as them. There are still people in Moscow (my parents probably among them) who are marching in support of Stalin. I don't worry about them. I worry when they march in support of Chavez. Stalin's dead. Chavez is alive. And therefore dangerous.

FLORIAN said...

I actually trust communists more than Muslims and the current brand of democratic leftists. Sad don't you think?

Farmer John said...

Every call for "freedom" is a bait and switch game. No revolution has actually "achieved" it. And if it does, it never lasts "unless" the results have been agreed to "beforehand". And eventually, even this "unnatural" regime will get corrupted as its' leaders forget "why".

MarxistFromLebanon said...

Jeez grow up and learn Marxism, it is amazing how you want to see one side rather the whole thing, but I can imagine nothing from a Neo-Con who is a victim of racism and CNN.

I love how you invent statements and shove it as "ours"...

poor victim, you got my pity

Always On Watch Two said...

Farmer,
Every call for "freedom" is a bait and switch game. No revolution has actually "achieved" it.

When the colonists revolted in 1776, they didn't view themselves as revolutionaries, but as restorers of the rights of Englishmen.

The various groups who make excuses for failed systems weary me.

Thie week, my history class is studying the ties between Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

beakerkin said...

Marxist

The actions of the people who have placed your Utopian philosophy are the sole criteria which Marxism is judged by. Nor is the rope a dope game with Trotsky valid. The bloodshed and repression does not start with Stalin by a longshot.

As far as racism this is interesting. Pseudostinians are not even an ethnic group. Muslims like Jooos come in all races. Arabs are non-racial and have ample lands stolen via 1400 years of colonialism and Jim Crowe treatment of minorities.

However, you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.