All movements are judged by the history of its adherents. Nazism is judged by the actions of its adherents. How do we begin a discussion of Nazism without any discussion of agressive warfare, the Holocaust and eugenics. Would we permit a person who wanted to resurect Nazism without discussion of those points, of course not.
Renegade Eye is livid as I pointed out he shares a common philosophy with Stalin, Mao, Fidel, the Black Panthers, the Red Army groups and so forth. The fact is that Communists attempt to play the bait and switch game. They like to pass the history of the USA and Israel under a microscope but wail if their own philosophies are placed under similar scrutiny. For example hos does a defender of Fidel Castro whose prisons practice genuine torture pass judgement on the events of Abu Gharib? How does one demand the extradition of Posada to Cuba without acknowledging Joanne Chessimard. Moreover, how does one demand to send someone to a country without an independent judiciary that practices genuine torture.
Renegade is proving my axiom about the totalitarian nature of Communists correct. One can look at this blog or on the very blogs he is crying about and see comments directed at me "masturbates to pictures of Daniel Pipes, practices wife beater logic". He is upset because I called Troutsky a simpleton. Sorry, but one can see plenty of insults tossed at me, only I do not cry.
One can see similar remarks by Communist on this blog uncensored. We have no need to censor Communists as their remarks speak for themselves. We have never censored a single comment for a personal attack.