Sunday, February 25, 2007

February 26, 1993 While We Slept

On February 26, 1993 our country was attacked by Muslim radicals. The roots of the attack were in the aftermath of the Meir Kahane assassination attempt. Many of the key players in the WTC 93 blast were present at the trial of the killer of Kahane. Kahane was an unsympathetic victim and many were glad to be rid of him. Many Jews including myself viewed him as a nut. The notion of a Jewish authoritarian theocracy is not the desire of the vast majority of Orthodox Jews. However, the government never explored links to a wider plot.

Laurie Mylroie has an excellent book explaining the probable links of the WTC-93 crew to Saddam Hussein. The important part to know is that many of the key members of Al Queda are Baloch. The Baloch are yet another example of an indigenous minority
that is well off the beaten path of self absorbed Marxists who rail about contrived ones 24/7 365 days aa year. The key figure in the WTC-93 plot was none other than Ramzi Youseff. Youseff was caught in the Philipinnes where he was planning a massive attack with ten airliners called bochinka. Hussien had a history of lengthy ties in the Balloch community via his intelligence services.

By mere coincedence Ramzi Youseff's uncle happens to be none other than Al Queda number three man Khalid Sheik Mohammad. For those of you unfamiliar with that name he was the dishevled terrorist who was caught almost three years ago with a serious resemblence to a disgusting porn star Ron Jeremy. This resemblence was pariodied in local talk radio for weeks after the captire.

I was on hand and in the WTC on February 26, 1993. I was on my way to buy theatre tickeds at the discount booth at the WTC. Obviously, I wasn't able to purchase those tickets. However, the notion that the facility had been bombed never dawned on me. I had believed that an accident had happened in the Path Station or an underground power plant. I found out that the WTC had been bombed when coworkers told me. They greeted my arrival with astonishment as if they had seen a ghost. All the local radio was knocked out but via the radio I heard the news.

The only injury I suffered that day was to my pride. I called up my date who had zero sympathy as she was well aware that was where the discount tickets were. I was ordered to go to the box office and pay full price. The next day I went out on the date and the subject of the explosion was never mentioned, for my own safety.

In the comming days we were lulled to sleep with the laughable prospect of Keystone Jihadists. The main culprit was caught trying to get a 500 dollar deposit on a van he blew up. Of course the dimwit sang and a cast of charachters was brought before the media. Most notable is SheiK Omar Abdel Rahman the blind incoherent cleric who dresses like Santa Claus and has a good friend in Commie attorney Lynne Stewart who is more incoherent than Rahman. I have met Stewart in person and she is uglier in person than on TV and is quite creepy even amongst deranged Commie types i Union Square.

We were lulled into a laughable business as usual life goes on period. The bombing became part of local jokes. The media portrayed the attempt as futile and nothing short of an atomic blast would bring the buildings down. Bill Clinton never visited the site in 1993. The matter was handled as a criminal affair. Meanwhile our enemies regrouped and came up with a bigger and better plan to attack the same facilities.

Clinton's one attempt to do something about Bin Ladden came at the apex of the Lewinsky scandal. One can hear the confirmation of Mansour Ijaz's points about the Sudanese offering Bin Ladden to the USA in Clinton's own voice on the web. This is not to blame Clinton for 9-11 as nobody could have grasped this. However, the unhinged left likes to blame Bush who was President for months for a plan that took years to execute.

Beamish in 08


Yankee Doodle said...


I think you're point might be that we've fallen asleep again?

Nuclear Strike on US Imminent?

Farmer John said...

Anarchists must love jihad...

FLORIAN said...

The writing has been on the wall for a long time now about the Jihadi's hate for us and Western civilization. Democrats always see terrorism as a police action, conservatives view it more as a military one--which is proper. Unfortunatly we have an administration not willing to dish out enough fire-power for victory and we'll be hit again in the future.

Always On Watch Two said...

Does anyone here remember the CIA-complex shootings? That might have happened in 1991.

beakerkin said...

Actualy I do. I have been looking for a mysterious drive by shooting in Yeshiva University in the 80's that was unsolved.

How one mistakes a pizzeria for a crack den is a mystery. That was the official explanation. The beloved Rav Roov was a student at the time.

Steve Harkonnen said...

You're spot on about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed looking a lot like Ron Jeremy. When he was caught, the joke in my office was that Jeremy actually did it.

But as far as not blaming Clinton for 9/11, I agree; however, he was indirectly the cause of 9/11 because according to the 9-11 commission report, if he had caught bin Laden then 9/11 wouldn't have happened. Do not forget that Clinton had the prime chance of capturing bin Laden but turned this opportunity down.

Urban_Infidel said...

I remember that day well.

I was still working in the 666 building on 5th Avenue. We got to leave early that afternoon. In the weeks following we had many bomb scares.

The worst of it was the six people who died and watching all those New Yorkers streaming out of the building covered in smoke. The thought of walking down hundreds flights of stairs in the smoke and darkness was terrifying It was truly eerie seeing the blacked out tower in the skyline from across the river that day. One tower lit, the other just black.

It was NY's first taste of the Santa Claus dressed up killer shiek. The beginning of modern Islamic grotesquerie we endure to this very day.

When is Lynne Stewart going to show up for prison? She is WAY overdue.

Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat said...


If I have to bonk everybody on the head with a clue bat I will.

9/11 would have happened even if Clinton accepted the offer from the Sudan to extradite Bin Laden. 9/11 wasn't Bin Laden's idea. He just lent money and manpower to the effort.

Getting Bin Laden now does nothing about the thousands of terrorists that passed through his Afghan training camps through the 1990s.

But let's not stress the importance of Osama Bin Laden beyond his significance as a figurehead in a larger field of behind-the-scenes actors.

The "mastermind" of the 9/11 attacks was Khalid Shiekh Muhammad, Baluchi Ron Jeremy look-alike and an Iraqi Mukhabarat liason. Most of Al Qaeda's operational leadership hierarchy are (or were until they were captured or killed) Baluchis, which Iraqi intelligence agencies had strong and traditional relations / recruiting ties with various Baluchi terrorist groups and militants. There's a reason much of Al Qaeda's leadership was rolled up and shipped to Gitmo after Iraq's intelligence agencies were raided by coalition forces and captured documents were exploited.

When you want to bust a terrorist network that places Baluchi militants in key operational positions, you kick over the government(s) who have them on speed dial.

Hiya Saddam.

Always On Watch Two said...

I just linked to this posting of yours.

beakerkin said...

Mr B

Have you read Mylroie's book. The fact that most of Al Queda's top leadership was Baluch with links to Saddam's intelligence service is not common knowledge.

Saddam was probably linked to WTC 93. His involvement in 9-11 is somewhat murkier.

Thanks for the link AOW.

Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat said...

I have read Mylroie, and Stephen Hayes at the Weekly Standard as well.

Taking out Iraq hurt Al Qaeda bad. There's no denying it.

Mr. Ducky said...

Mansour Ijaz? Are you delirious?

The NewsMax exclusive tape? Did you get a copy for $9.95 over at Jihad Watch?

Beak, you are as completely off the wall crazy on this one as Beamish. That 85 I.Q. fool is going to explain why he is an expert on Al-Qaeda's command and control structure.

Beak, tell your "community" to stop acting like a bunch of maroons.

Bunch of bed wetters who have more conspiracy theories than the X-Files.

beakerkin said...


I have heard the tape and Bill Clinton is quite clear. Christaine Amanpour asked Bill Clinton about the matter and said he was confused.

Ijaz has been proven correct and Clinton's history of lying is well known. Ijaz is well spoken and worked as a Democratic operative before joining FOX.

You have Beamish envy.

Mr. Ducky said...

Ijaz has been proven correct? By whom?

You'll believe anything.

Yeagley, Bat Shit, Spencer, Poe ... you feel comfortable being a camp follower for the crazies.

beakerkin said...

Lets see Ijaz went infront of the 9-11 commision with no lawyers and army of staff and presented his side.

Bill Clinton went with Sandy Burglar and has a history of lying under oath. Moreover, Clinton himself is on tape mentioning the offer existed. His did not deny the story only claims he was confused by the dates when questioned by Amanpour.

Ijaz is more credible than a convicted perjurer. The meaning of is is. I smoked but I didn't inhale. I didn't violate the laws of the USA because the pot was smoked in the UK. I didn't have sex with that women, he must have meant Hillary.

C'mon Ducky sing a chorus of Blue Stained Dress.

FYI The name Slick Willie comes from Al Gore.

Mr. Ducky said...

You loose Beak. The fact that Ijaz went in front of the commission means nothing. None of his claims have been substantiated (at least not by the 9/11 commision which dismissed the whole Sudan story).

I don't believe he actually testified at the commision. Maybe you can clear that up.

Anyway. He's a loon who is now unknown to everyone except Beak's lunatic camp followers.

beakerkin said...

Wrong Ducky

Even media matters acknowledged the Sudanese government confirmed the offer. Lets see the Sudanese government has zero to gain. Ijaz testified under oath and has no record of perjury.

Moreover even Media Matters doesn't say Clinton never described the offer. The liberal spin is the offer was to send Bin Ladden to Saudi Arabia. Is media matters liberal enough for you.

Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat said...


I never claimed expert knowledge of Al Qaeda's command and control structure.

However, as I am unburdened with convincing people that I am a leftist, I pursue avenues of inquiry that open to me by making the attempt to be informed. Books, web archives, government reports, Al Qaeda's own source material and Islamist message forums - anything that can give insight.

I've concluded (as well as Osama Bin Laden, during one of his last messages) that toppling Iraq hurt al-Qaeda's C&C structure. I'm not alone in this assessment.

Now, I realize as a leftist that you've got stock in believing that merely getting Osama Bin Laden will open the skies to sunshine, rainbows, and happy little birds we can all live happily ever after under. But, since I'm not a leftist, I have to consider that there's a lot more to Al Qaeda than just one man. Since I'm not a leftist, I'm not driven to convince everyone I'm an idiot.

I do have to let you know that you can take a break, though. We already know you're an idiot.

Damn, you're even to stupid to realize that.