I have perused the familair liberal blogs and I am hardly surprised by the lack of vision and in many cases common sense. I respect patriotic liberals and sometimes agree with them. Yet many have taken to defending and aping Euro- Marxist Anti Americanism. They believe that they are superior in intelligence but in reality they offer zero.
1 Terorist Problem. Bush lied troops died. No solution no no answers . More political opportunism with your lives on the line. Its solutions stupid.
2 Ambassador Wilson. Wilson was a Kerry opperative who was appointed by his wife lied
about it. Does this idiocy move the Dems forward ? Bush will still be here at the end of the day. Vision demonstrated , zero
3 Health Care . You do not like the current system , fine. Lets here a plan and start
debate. Solutions offered to the American people zero.
4 Falwell Like it or not religious conservatives have a right to their opinions. The fact tat you or I disagree with them does not make them terrorists or PC punching bags. The idiocy of the mock furor over the slightest negative reference to Islam while trashing Falwell and Robertson is illustritive of a values problem. In reality Islam treats gays far worse then Christianity. Religious and ethnic minority rights are non existent. What you have in reality are some liberals and far left types agitating for Jim Crowe . Falwell says x about gays . However when the mayor of London meets with a cleric who advocates killing gays its peachy. In fact only the joooos and the zionists have a problem.
5 I have yet to see the F word in any of the familiar liberal blogs. What about the future and where do we go from here ?
The liberals have sadly been seduced by their anti American cohorts on the left. The fact is when I talk to many the theme is what is wrong with Communists..... The fact that there is a history of sedition and a mere 100,000,000 dead are minor details. Pictures of naked twister in Abu Gharib are just more important then 100,000,000 dead. It is the priorities that we regular folk can not grasp. That is why we need Uncle John Kerry because you can not think for yourself.
When are the liberals going to ditch the Marxist and blame America types and offer vision ? They have become the party of gripes and obstructionism.
Will the last partiotic liberal turn out the light at the DNC.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I posted a comment here earlier, but apparently it never made it to the site. Pardon me if the earlier comment appears and thereby makes this comment a duplicate.
The fact that Dems don't offer solutions makes them look like whiners and sore losers at best.
While the two-party system has never been pretty, it's uglier now.
The Democratic Party hasn't recovered from losing the Civil War 140 years ago.
Mr Beamish if Rob Bayn is still reading can you remind him what party was Abe Lincoln a member of . Can you also remind him what party was responsible for the internment of Japanese. His history is way off.
Always
At some point the Democrats are going to be a local party. On a national level they are finished .
They are more concerned with pandering to left wing extreemists then winning elections.
I would like to see some ideas but
Bush lied troops died is a slogan and inaccurate. I hve yet to ever see a post on the familiar liberal blogs with vision. The anger has consumed the liberals . Some seem more concerned with sticking it to Bush then winning the war on terror.
beak:
republicanism in 1860 is far different than republicanism now. the whole party ideals were swapped in the early 20th century. i forgot which election it was, but all i remember from class is that african americans had abandoned their loyalty of the republicans who had declared them free.
The dems have taken their eyes of the prize. And we're all suffering because of it.
Drummaster,
To say there was a swap in party ideals between Democrats and Republicans "somewhere" in the 20th Century is one thing, to actually find the point of departure is another. But we can peruse the development of Democratic ideology from defense of slavery to terrorism against blacks (the Ku Klux Klan began as the militant wing of the DNC) to Jim Crow laws to opposition to civil rights legislation to codifying affirmative action laws that presuppose that minorities need to be handicapped some merit for advancement to overcome some sick perception of inborn racial inferiority and we can confidently ask "What's changed?" Trading chains and slop buckets for communal housing and government checks?
The only thing that has changed between 1805 and 2005 is that Democrats have embraced Marxism.
Post a Comment