I am always amused at the Left complaining about talk radio or Fox News. These same people look perplexed when the right point out similar biases at the NYT or CBS. My take is simpler if you don't like something change the channel. Any media outlet has bias and that is the nature of the profession. " They should change their motto from
fair and Balanced ". They should do that after another network changes its motto from "news you can trust".
The anger at Fox News is typified by a blogger I respect the Chemist. Other than some( ahem) language issues he runs a superior blog and has a first rate mind. His blog
is contains sentiments similar to what I encountered in NYC at the RNC. The title of the Post says it all F-king Fox News. The post is about the substition of the word
Homicide Bomber from the original Suicide Bomber. This is a minor point and the News media uses language like this all the time. The term is more accurate in my opinion and in that of another poster Amicus Curaie. The Chemist see the substitution as an attempt to manipulate emotions.
The essential part is the emotional nature of the anger at FOX NEWS. The Chemist is a great guy but hardly unique. He is in fact better than most except for an odd remark about Van Sustren in a Swimsuit. She has a home spun interesting look that is
a refreshing change . In fairness there has been similar rage on the right at the media. However now that we have digital cable an the internet one has plenty of options for information. The blogosphere is a vital took at checking big Media arrogance. The CBS memogate fiasco was a blog driven story about Journalistic malfeasance. Blogs like this one and the Chemist are part of the new media.In many ways we are more Democratic as we are challenged by opposition. We have to defend our posts unless one is the person with a 167 IQ.
The Chemist and I see a different viewer of News. He sees a guilable misinformed vulerable consumer. I see a consumer than makes a choice every time that they select
a media outlet.The consumer is well aware of FOX slant and quite a few choose it for that reason. Conservatives should have their news outlets and Fox caters to that market. In fact I am surpised there aren't more conservative stations given that popularity breeds immitation.
Fox News presents the news in a fair manner in my opinion. I have zero idea of what
political leanings Laurie Dhue, Neil Cavuto , Rebecca Gomez or Heather Nauert are.
Brit Hume seems to lean right and is professional. Their panels are fairly balanced
and it employs a first class analysts such as Kondrake, Clift , Ginnzburg, Napalitano,Juan Williams, Barnes and Feraro. I wish that they still had my favorite Monica Crowley but she works on MSNBC.
Bill O'Rielly is more a populist with a swelled head than a true conservative. I stopped watching because the self promotion became excessive. He certainly leans right but is closer to the center than Mathews . Mathews is ruder and more abusive to guests the O Reilly but Zell Miller put him in his place. Ambushing Michelle Malkin was much easier as she does not have a temper. Had Mathews read the book in question he would not have asked Malkin the series of stupid questions. He has lowered the vollume since election day.
Hannity and Colmes makes an attempt a balance and always presents the other side. The Chemist is not a fan of Colmes who isn't a Liberal or isn't good at his job. Colmes is a classy articulate man who is not as combative as Hannity. Hannity is always well prepared and in control. This is in contast to Mathews who does not even read the book in question. The left doesn't care for Hannity who is seen as a bully.
He has a charming personality and if they think he is tough they should listen to the man behind Hannity on the radio. Levin takes no prisoners and is far tougher than Hannity.
Greta Van Sustren has a legal type show and has a first rate mind. She worked at CNN so I doubt she became a conservative overnight . Her show is more about the law and I have zero idea what her views are.
E.D. Hill worked at ABC and her skills on the morning show are better than Couric. She has a good sense of humor and can interview with the best. Rita Crosby is the most under rated talent in media. Her interviewing skills are the best on the Channel. When charged with runnig a forum she is better then anyone in the business.
Unfortunately, she gets the crime beat but durring the war she was in top form. Laurie Dhue is the most unfairly critiqued person on Fox but it is based on lookism.
She has run panels deftly and above average in interviewing skills. Rick Leventhal is a great correspondent and seems to be everywhere on the planet.
The anger on the left is based on a string of losses. However, it is easy to blame talk radio , News Corp or Fox News rather than look in the mirror. The left has to offer a vision and screaming voices push people away.The sad part is that the left does not even recognize a moderate. When I hear the dunces from the UK crying fascist
it makes me laugh. They have zero clue what real Americans think and congregate with other like minded folk. After the election I asked dozens of NYC leftists how many
Bush voters they knew other than myself. Nobody could name more than to and most had
a hard time naming one. The reason is obvious most Conservatives or moderates would do not want to deal with over the top anger.
When America sees the left it sees a spoiled self righteous child. Michael Moore, Answer , Code Pink, Chomsky and Lerner are despised by average Americans. A wise Liberal Kafkaesq pointed out Falwell and Robertson. However if you were to ask average Americans who would you rather have lunch with Moore or Robertson most would
choose Roberston. I would rather sit as a Jew in a Church than at a Peace protest. I
have been in Churches and never heard a negative or angry word. When I go to a peace
protest I hear nothing but anger and an eye opening amount of Jew hatred.
The last charge is not made lightly but accurate. Even friends who voted for Kerry and were not Jewish were shocked. The tin foil hat brigade is quite vocal at the protests. Conspiracy no 1 Neocons, Likud, Mossad and the military industrial complex blew up the wtc. As an eyewitness to 9-11 and a WTC 93 survivor this is exceedingly
offensive to me. Conspiracy no 2 . The recent election was stolen and the Zionist media covered it up. Conspiracy 3 The Zionist media contols all the news and manipulated us into war. I also heard two Holocaust Deniers but most of the leftists
walked away from that. The leftists were unconfortable with the evil Talmud speaker but he continued. Mayor Bloomberg was denounced as the evil "Jew" mayor .I asked a leftist what would be done if I made a similar statement about Dinkins. The radical
said " You are right but I would never admit it".
I like when the Chemist talks about paranoid Conservatives. The sad part is that he fails to see the anger in his excellent blog. F-king Fox News, The President is a Pussy and calling Republicans the Party of God are examples of this anger. He posses
a first rate mind but fails to note that regular people do not listen to angry people.The people had a choice of blame America first and positive patriotism and chose the latter. Conspiracy Cranks, Anger and blame America first is not the way to win minds or elections.
Friday, April 08, 2005
Thursday, April 07, 2005
The Recidivist strikes again skirting bigotry
The man with the 167 IQ continues in his never ending daily rants targeted at one population group. This would be amusing if he did not think he was the paragon of morality. He is quick to condemn percieved biases against ethnicities when convenient, such as his claims of antimuslim , Arab & Palestinian content in this blog. Yet he recoils at the mere suggestion of anti- Jewish sentiments in his own blog. He reminds me of an old fashioned redneck on his porch talking about good black people ( his nieghbors) and thos evil negroes down the road. A redneck has no idea idea how absurd he or she looks. They ramble on every day often saying things like "I have a 167 IQ" to cover up their stupidity. In the case of the REcidivist this is impossible. He seems to revel in his stupidity aided by two sycophants Viper85 and Craig.
Http://recidivistjournals.blogspot.com/2005/04/theft-of-holocaust.html
It is a variation of a complaint I have made before (and no doubt keep on making) , but I was browsing through my niece's Cambridge Family Encyclopedia last night and noticed ....it was written up as an entirely Jewish event.
I am certainly not in Holocaust Denial and I have nothing but total disgust for the Nazi's treatment of Jews ( not just the six million Jews who perished in the Holocaust) but it does piss me of enormously when I see a supposedly credible referece book, used by millions of children, totaly ignore better than 60% (twelve or so million) of the people who were systematically exterminated in the Holocaust.
Lest we forget in addition to the 6,000,000 Jews the other forgotten victims are.
6,000,000 Slavic Citizens
3,500,000 Non Jewish Polish Citizens
1,500,000 cinilian Political dissidents
800,000 Gypsies
300,000 People with disabilities
25,000 Gay men
2,000 Jehova's Witnesses
And this isn't counting the 4,000,000 Soviet POW who weren't so much exterminated as just left to die of cold and starvation
Had he taken a trip to the US Holocaust Museum he would have found a more balanced presentation. However being that he is lazy despite his "167 IQ " we will help him out on this blog. Http://www.ushman.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005143
The reason for this mention is that Jews , Gypsies and some Slavs were targeted due to racial inferiority. The other groups were persecuted on political and behavioral
grounds. Many of these other victims died as a result of incarceration.
The ratio of Jews who perished was 2/3 of a large number. The 25,000 number is obviously alot lower ratio. There were most probably twice that number in Berlin alone. The Holocaust is unique do the almost industrial manner of death largely applied to Jews extermination camps. A person with an IQ of 167 should know these things.We think the Recidivist protests a bit to much.
Http://recidivistjournals.blogspot.com/2005/04/theft-of-holocaust.html
It is a variation of a complaint I have made before (and no doubt keep on making) , but I was browsing through my niece's Cambridge Family Encyclopedia last night and noticed ....it was written up as an entirely Jewish event.
I am certainly not in Holocaust Denial and I have nothing but total disgust for the Nazi's treatment of Jews ( not just the six million Jews who perished in the Holocaust) but it does piss me of enormously when I see a supposedly credible referece book, used by millions of children, totaly ignore better than 60% (twelve or so million) of the people who were systematically exterminated in the Holocaust.
Lest we forget in addition to the 6,000,000 Jews the other forgotten victims are.
6,000,000 Slavic Citizens
3,500,000 Non Jewish Polish Citizens
1,500,000 cinilian Political dissidents
800,000 Gypsies
300,000 People with disabilities
25,000 Gay men
2,000 Jehova's Witnesses
And this isn't counting the 4,000,000 Soviet POW who weren't so much exterminated as just left to die of cold and starvation
Had he taken a trip to the US Holocaust Museum he would have found a more balanced presentation. However being that he is lazy despite his "167 IQ " we will help him out on this blog. Http://www.ushman.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005143
The reason for this mention is that Jews , Gypsies and some Slavs were targeted due to racial inferiority. The other groups were persecuted on political and behavioral
grounds. Many of these other victims died as a result of incarceration.
The ratio of Jews who perished was 2/3 of a large number. The 25,000 number is obviously alot lower ratio. There were most probably twice that number in Berlin alone. The Holocaust is unique do the almost industrial manner of death largely applied to Jews extermination camps. A person with an IQ of 167 should know these things.We think the Recidivist protests a bit to much.
Wednesday, April 06, 2005
The Recidivist IQ of of 167 ,but divided by what ?
The comedian known as the Recidivist proclaims he has an IQ of 167. The pity is that if this were true he has never used that potential. Intelligent people have no need to proclaim their achievements and also know how to open a history book. The facts free, folklore and source free blog are evidence to the contrary.His failure to allow
dissent of any form is due to a profound lack of intellect. Why should I craft a tailored response when he will cry racism throw a hissy fit and delete the comments. If the remarks were racist he would post the comments. However, like the rest of the
crew they make charges do not document them or provide sources. Yet they come here and demand documentation and call me a hypocrite. I do comply with the requests as it is fairly easy and Warren has done an excellent job as well.
Let us observe just some classics of this superior intellect.
1 He has called me racist and claims that I have a problem with Palestinians Arabs and Muslims. None of those categories are racial and someone with an IQ of 167 should know that. Muslims come in every racial category and can be found across the globe.
Arabs are not a race in any definition and are Semites who are white. Palestinians are Arabs as illustrated ad nausem and this is not a racial point but factual.
2 The use of the term Arab in the PLO charter refers to a linguistic affiliation. Obviously, his high IQ is unrelated to reading comprehension. His chest beating and arrogance are mere camouflage for profound stupidity.
Article 5 The Palestinians are those Arab nationals who, until 1947 normally resided in Palestine regardless of if they were evicted or stayed there. Anyone born after that date of a Palestinian father whether inside Palestine or outside it are Palestinians.
Article 1 Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people , it is an indivisible part of the Arab homeland. Palestinians people are part of the Arab nation.
Our stand up comedian known as the Recidivist claims Palestinians are not Arabs. The PLO charter must be one of my zionist sources. Arabs arived in the seventh century well after the Jews had been there a mere 2600 years later. The question about who is indigenous is laughable.
In fact his claim about indigenous people is further debunked by Derhowitz case for
Israel Page 86. " The UN recognizing that many of the refugees had not lived for long in the villages they left, made a remarkable decision to change the definition of refugee - only for the purpose of definingwho is an Arab refugee from Israel- to
include people who lived in Israel 2 years before leaving. Moreover an Arab was counted as a refugee if he moved from one part of Palestine to another-even if he returned to the village where he had previously lived and in which his family still
still lived,from a village he moved only two years earlier.
3 Druze are not Arab.
There is an article by Moustafa F Moukarim on the net Druze Arab Ascendancy. It will
make the matter clear they are Arabs. If he knew the first thing about Druze this is
obvious.They practice a secretive religion not considered Islamic and proudly serve in the Israeli military. They have also been historicaly persecuted by Islamic rulers. They have a better claim for nationhood than the "Palestinians".
Obviously , Druze history is not part of his 167 IQ.
4 Egyptians are not Arabs. If they are Coptic an opressed minority the Recidivist is right. Unfortunately, these indigenous people are opressed by the Arab majority . These people are one of many the Recidivist ignores. Real indigenous people get ignored and fake one become cause celebre. Welcome to the fantasy world of the Recidivist where all Jooooos who disagree with him are Eeeeeeviiillllll racists and dem good jooooooooos agree with me.
Several close friends are Coptic Christians and they point out they readily point out
they are not Arab. In fact they are 6000 years old and have their own language, it is used in prayer. They face oppression in their native land but the Recidivist has said zero. In fact the next word on the subject will be his first.
A person with an IQ of 167 should know the basics of Coptic history.
5 Iraqis are not Arabs.
Only if they are Assyrian , Kurds or Turkomen.
The Assyrians are another minority that has been persecuted by Islam. They are not Arabs and several of my friends readily point this out. They suffered genocide at the hands of the Turks and Kurds in WW1. 750,000 died and one can learn more at AINA.
The Recidivist has said zero words about these indigenous people who have been opressed by Turks and Arabs . They have their own languge , religion and 4000 plus year historical identity.
Kurds are also not Arab and readily point this out. They have their own language and history of at a couple of thousand years. The Recidivist expresses surprise that in some studies Jews are more closely related to Anatolians and Kurds. The reason is obvious to anyone familiar with history. They were indigenous long before the Arab invasions. Jews have lived in large numbers amongst the Kurds.
Turkomen are Anatolian and also more related to Jews than Arabs. They were in the region long before the Arab invasion.
A person with a 167 IQ would know that almost everyone else is an Arab. Obviously his learning in this area is substandard. He has devoted zero space to real indigenous people with far greater cases for nationhood. Yet he devotes lenghty passages to support imaginary indigenous people in the worlds only Jewish state. With
the Recidivist it always boils down to joooooooooos. Those nasty jooooooos who disagree with me are eeeeeeeeeeevil.
Iranians are not Arab. He must assume that I confuse Arab with Islamic. No 51% are Persians 24% Azerbajani 8% Gilaki and Mazandari 7% Kurd 3% Arab 2% Lur 2% Baloch
2% Turkmen other 1%
Unlike the Recidivist I am well aware of who lives in Iran. One can read more at
http://www.Iranonline.com/iran/iran/iran-info/people/
One can read about the genocide inflicted on the Zoroastrians at Vohuman. This is the Education institute for Zoroastrians.
In the fantasy world of the 167 IQ Recidivist everyone sang campfire songs in Iran durring the Arab invasions. Unfortunately, they imposed a brutal Jim Crow Dhimmi sytems that the Mongols dismantled .That is correct if you were a Jew, Zoroastrian, Christian or other minority one was treated better under the Mongols. Http://www.iranchamber.com/religions/history_of_iranian_jews2.php.
A person with an IQ of 167 should be familiar with Persian history. Yet another area
that the Recidivist ignores. In fact if you make a refference to it he calls you a
racist. The rest of us living in reality know there is no Muslim race and have a grasp of history. The mentaly challenged Recidivist hides behind labels, but he has a 167 IQ.
6 "There isn't such a thing as a single Arab people"
This must come as news to actual residents of the Middle East. Most of the states were created by an Anglo French treaty. If he has any clue about the Arab conquests
he would understand the reason for genetic variation. If a culture practices ethnocide on indigenous people this would increase the variation of genes. If sexual slavery is practiced that tends to change the gene pool as well. As for males there was a widely practiced Janisary system . Conquered people were required to part with their children who were raised as Islamic wariors.
Obviously the Recidivist with an IQ of 167 merely forgets these details.
7 " The concept of a state whose simple purpose is to promote a specific ethnicity is by its very definition racist"
Israel is home to black African Falsha's, White Ashkenazi, Darker White Sephardim,
Daker still Mizrahim, Jews from India Bene Israel are darker still, there are Peruvian Indian converts and Asian Shinlung. The entire human race is represnted in Israel.This makes the Recidivists claim comedic unless it is againsts space aliens.
Poland , Lithuania and Germany are some of the other nations with right of return laws.
The Recidivist has an IQ of 167 but does not know the difference between race and ethnicity . He uses the terms incorrectly but that is a minor detail to an uber genius. ( Real intelligent people like Dr Yeagley never state the obvious )
8 " Because it fails to admit the reality that the minority indigenous Jewish community in Palestine for the last 2000 years was undistinguishable from its Christian and Muslim Palestinian bretheren "
A person with an IQ of 167 should know that no sentence ever begin with because. He does this well over ten times. Yet the laws of grammar do not apply to the all knowing and wise Recidivist.
The Jews and Christians were readily distinguishable from the Muslims. They were the ones who were forced to live under the Jim Crow laws. Read Do not be a Dhimmi for more information. Aparthied practiced by Muslims is okay to the all wise Recidivist.
Http://secularIslam.org/jihad/subjects.html
The people who wrote this material say things I would not touch. They are all former
muslims and abhor zionism as well.I do not go near the religion as I am not a theologian . I guess those people must also be racist as well.
9 "There is no such thing as the sinlgle Jewish ethnic identity"
This must come as a shock to a people that have their own language , 4000 plus year clear historical identity and a distinct religion. I guess the all knowing 167 IQ
Recidivist is unaware of those insignificant details. Obviously he has another definition of the term ethnicity than the rest of us mortals. He would have been better served by saying less. Yet humility is not the trait associated with the man
with the 167 IQ.
10
"Genitic studies of Jewsthat most non European Jews have no connection at all with
the historical holy lands"
" Most Euopean Jews are not descended from the Israelites at all . They are descended from converts in now what is Turkey"
"Palestinian People(who are genetically the same as those Jews who have ties to the
Palesine)
He is all over the place but this may be due to a 167 IQ . The Palestinians are the same as Jews. European Jews have no conection to Israel. Non Europen jews have no conection to Israel. This is comedic fodder at best except for it is inconsistent with itself.
http://www.khaziacom/genetics/abstracts.html
"the main ethnic elemnt of Askenazim ,Sephardim,mizrakhim, juhurim, Italquim and most other Jewish populations is Israelite"
However if he knew anything about Jewish culture this topic would be moot. Converts have always had equal status to born Jews. People who leave the culture have no rights within the culture. A Jew is more than product of genes and we have them in abundance. A Jew is a person who chooses to Join our Religion and be a part of our culture. We have no missionary tradition and unlike Islam no history of coerced conversions. Those people who choose to join are our equals.
Yet a person with an IQ of I67 should know the basics of Jewish tradition. The person should be able to put coherent thoughts together. Obviously, this Super genius lives in another dimension of logic.
Thank you Recidivist for sharing your (gufaw ) wisdom with us. What will you do for an encore ? Any other comedic gems you want to impart. Maybe you can get Viper85 and
Craig and do a venriloquist act. The question of who plays the dummy is moot because all three are amply qualified.
The Recivist may answer everyones question as to how a person with an IQ of 167 could
say so many ignorant things.
...." In case you are not aware IQ isn't a static thing"......
In the case of the Recidivist we want to know if it is now 167/3 or greater.
A wiser man would have said less.
Being that I get so much space in your blog I would like a headline. The Recidivist Journal featuring Beakerkin would be nice. For someone who does not read my blog I seem to get alot of coverage. People with a 167 IQ must be able to obtain information
without reading. You also seem to spend alot of time responding to this blog as well. I am honest enough to admit I read your facts free, folklore, bigoted blog as it is the equivalent of a cyber car crash.
My blog is linked in other forums and I assure you that you and your followers are laughing stocks. A person with an IQ of 167 should be able to detect laughter. People
are not laughing with you they are laughing at you.
dissent of any form is due to a profound lack of intellect. Why should I craft a tailored response when he will cry racism throw a hissy fit and delete the comments. If the remarks were racist he would post the comments. However, like the rest of the
crew they make charges do not document them or provide sources. Yet they come here and demand documentation and call me a hypocrite. I do comply with the requests as it is fairly easy and Warren has done an excellent job as well.
Let us observe just some classics of this superior intellect.
1 He has called me racist and claims that I have a problem with Palestinians Arabs and Muslims. None of those categories are racial and someone with an IQ of 167 should know that. Muslims come in every racial category and can be found across the globe.
Arabs are not a race in any definition and are Semites who are white. Palestinians are Arabs as illustrated ad nausem and this is not a racial point but factual.
2 The use of the term Arab in the PLO charter refers to a linguistic affiliation. Obviously, his high IQ is unrelated to reading comprehension. His chest beating and arrogance are mere camouflage for profound stupidity.
Article 5 The Palestinians are those Arab nationals who, until 1947 normally resided in Palestine regardless of if they were evicted or stayed there. Anyone born after that date of a Palestinian father whether inside Palestine or outside it are Palestinians.
Article 1 Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people , it is an indivisible part of the Arab homeland. Palestinians people are part of the Arab nation.
Our stand up comedian known as the Recidivist claims Palestinians are not Arabs. The PLO charter must be one of my zionist sources. Arabs arived in the seventh century well after the Jews had been there a mere 2600 years later. The question about who is indigenous is laughable.
In fact his claim about indigenous people is further debunked by Derhowitz case for
Israel Page 86. " The UN recognizing that many of the refugees had not lived for long in the villages they left, made a remarkable decision to change the definition of refugee - only for the purpose of definingwho is an Arab refugee from Israel- to
include people who lived in Israel 2 years before leaving. Moreover an Arab was counted as a refugee if he moved from one part of Palestine to another-even if he returned to the village where he had previously lived and in which his family still
still lived,from a village he moved only two years earlier.
3 Druze are not Arab.
There is an article by Moustafa F Moukarim on the net Druze Arab Ascendancy. It will
make the matter clear they are Arabs. If he knew the first thing about Druze this is
obvious.They practice a secretive religion not considered Islamic and proudly serve in the Israeli military. They have also been historicaly persecuted by Islamic rulers. They have a better claim for nationhood than the "Palestinians".
Obviously , Druze history is not part of his 167 IQ.
4 Egyptians are not Arabs. If they are Coptic an opressed minority the Recidivist is right. Unfortunately, these indigenous people are opressed by the Arab majority . These people are one of many the Recidivist ignores. Real indigenous people get ignored and fake one become cause celebre. Welcome to the fantasy world of the Recidivist where all Jooooos who disagree with him are Eeeeeeviiillllll racists and dem good jooooooooos agree with me.
Several close friends are Coptic Christians and they point out they readily point out
they are not Arab. In fact they are 6000 years old and have their own language, it is used in prayer. They face oppression in their native land but the Recidivist has said zero. In fact the next word on the subject will be his first.
A person with an IQ of 167 should know the basics of Coptic history.
5 Iraqis are not Arabs.
Only if they are Assyrian , Kurds or Turkomen.
The Assyrians are another minority that has been persecuted by Islam. They are not Arabs and several of my friends readily point this out. They suffered genocide at the hands of the Turks and Kurds in WW1. 750,000 died and one can learn more at AINA.
The Recidivist has said zero words about these indigenous people who have been opressed by Turks and Arabs . They have their own languge , religion and 4000 plus year historical identity.
Kurds are also not Arab and readily point this out. They have their own language and history of at a couple of thousand years. The Recidivist expresses surprise that in some studies Jews are more closely related to Anatolians and Kurds. The reason is obvious to anyone familiar with history. They were indigenous long before the Arab invasions. Jews have lived in large numbers amongst the Kurds.
Turkomen are Anatolian and also more related to Jews than Arabs. They were in the region long before the Arab invasion.
A person with a 167 IQ would know that almost everyone else is an Arab. Obviously his learning in this area is substandard. He has devoted zero space to real indigenous people with far greater cases for nationhood. Yet he devotes lenghty passages to support imaginary indigenous people in the worlds only Jewish state. With
the Recidivist it always boils down to joooooooooos. Those nasty jooooooos who disagree with me are eeeeeeeeeeevil.
Iranians are not Arab. He must assume that I confuse Arab with Islamic. No 51% are Persians 24% Azerbajani 8% Gilaki and Mazandari 7% Kurd 3% Arab 2% Lur 2% Baloch
2% Turkmen other 1%
Unlike the Recidivist I am well aware of who lives in Iran. One can read more at
http://www.Iranonline.com/iran/iran/iran-info/people/
One can read about the genocide inflicted on the Zoroastrians at Vohuman. This is the Education institute for Zoroastrians.
In the fantasy world of the 167 IQ Recidivist everyone sang campfire songs in Iran durring the Arab invasions. Unfortunately, they imposed a brutal Jim Crow Dhimmi sytems that the Mongols dismantled .That is correct if you were a Jew, Zoroastrian, Christian or other minority one was treated better under the Mongols. Http://www.iranchamber.com/religions/history_of_iranian_jews2.php.
A person with an IQ of 167 should be familiar with Persian history. Yet another area
that the Recidivist ignores. In fact if you make a refference to it he calls you a
racist. The rest of us living in reality know there is no Muslim race and have a grasp of history. The mentaly challenged Recidivist hides behind labels, but he has a 167 IQ.
6 "There isn't such a thing as a single Arab people"
This must come as news to actual residents of the Middle East. Most of the states were created by an Anglo French treaty. If he has any clue about the Arab conquests
he would understand the reason for genetic variation. If a culture practices ethnocide on indigenous people this would increase the variation of genes. If sexual slavery is practiced that tends to change the gene pool as well. As for males there was a widely practiced Janisary system . Conquered people were required to part with their children who were raised as Islamic wariors.
Obviously the Recidivist with an IQ of 167 merely forgets these details.
7 " The concept of a state whose simple purpose is to promote a specific ethnicity is by its very definition racist"
Israel is home to black African Falsha's, White Ashkenazi, Darker White Sephardim,
Daker still Mizrahim, Jews from India Bene Israel are darker still, there are Peruvian Indian converts and Asian Shinlung. The entire human race is represnted in Israel.This makes the Recidivists claim comedic unless it is againsts space aliens.
Poland , Lithuania and Germany are some of the other nations with right of return laws.
The Recidivist has an IQ of 167 but does not know the difference between race and ethnicity . He uses the terms incorrectly but that is a minor detail to an uber genius. ( Real intelligent people like Dr Yeagley never state the obvious )
8 " Because it fails to admit the reality that the minority indigenous Jewish community in Palestine for the last 2000 years was undistinguishable from its Christian and Muslim Palestinian bretheren "
A person with an IQ of 167 should know that no sentence ever begin with because. He does this well over ten times. Yet the laws of grammar do not apply to the all knowing and wise Recidivist.
The Jews and Christians were readily distinguishable from the Muslims. They were the ones who were forced to live under the Jim Crow laws. Read Do not be a Dhimmi for more information. Aparthied practiced by Muslims is okay to the all wise Recidivist.
Http://secularIslam.org/jihad/subjects.html
The people who wrote this material say things I would not touch. They are all former
muslims and abhor zionism as well.I do not go near the religion as I am not a theologian . I guess those people must also be racist as well.
9 "There is no such thing as the sinlgle Jewish ethnic identity"
This must come as a shock to a people that have their own language , 4000 plus year clear historical identity and a distinct religion. I guess the all knowing 167 IQ
Recidivist is unaware of those insignificant details. Obviously he has another definition of the term ethnicity than the rest of us mortals. He would have been better served by saying less. Yet humility is not the trait associated with the man
with the 167 IQ.
10
"Genitic studies of Jewsthat most non European Jews have no connection at all with
the historical holy lands"
" Most Euopean Jews are not descended from the Israelites at all . They are descended from converts in now what is Turkey"
"Palestinian People(who are genetically the same as those Jews who have ties to the
Palesine)
He is all over the place but this may be due to a 167 IQ . The Palestinians are the same as Jews. European Jews have no conection to Israel. Non Europen jews have no conection to Israel. This is comedic fodder at best except for it is inconsistent with itself.
http://www.khaziacom/genetics/abstracts.html
"the main ethnic elemnt of Askenazim ,Sephardim,mizrakhim, juhurim, Italquim and most other Jewish populations is Israelite"
However if he knew anything about Jewish culture this topic would be moot. Converts have always had equal status to born Jews. People who leave the culture have no rights within the culture. A Jew is more than product of genes and we have them in abundance. A Jew is a person who chooses to Join our Religion and be a part of our culture. We have no missionary tradition and unlike Islam no history of coerced conversions. Those people who choose to join are our equals.
Yet a person with an IQ of I67 should know the basics of Jewish tradition. The person should be able to put coherent thoughts together. Obviously, this Super genius lives in another dimension of logic.
Thank you Recidivist for sharing your (gufaw ) wisdom with us. What will you do for an encore ? Any other comedic gems you want to impart. Maybe you can get Viper85 and
Craig and do a venriloquist act. The question of who plays the dummy is moot because all three are amply qualified.
The Recivist may answer everyones question as to how a person with an IQ of 167 could
say so many ignorant things.
...." In case you are not aware IQ isn't a static thing"......
In the case of the Recidivist we want to know if it is now 167/3 or greater.
A wiser man would have said less.
Being that I get so much space in your blog I would like a headline. The Recidivist Journal featuring Beakerkin would be nice. For someone who does not read my blog I seem to get alot of coverage. People with a 167 IQ must be able to obtain information
without reading. You also seem to spend alot of time responding to this blog as well. I am honest enough to admit I read your facts free, folklore, bigoted blog as it is the equivalent of a cyber car crash.
My blog is linked in other forums and I assure you that you and your followers are laughing stocks. A person with an IQ of 167 should be able to detect laughter. People
are not laughing with you they are laughing at you.
Tuesday, April 05, 2005
Free Speech and the excesses of it
We have comedic visitors to this blog that claim I want to silence certain blogs. The only blog one can silence or control is your own. The price we pay for any freedom is that we must tolerate its excesses. Thus pornography , hate speech and ignorance are protected by this right. If there ever were an IQ requirement the Recidivists would have problems. Of late he seems to have lost his usual bluster and
arrogance. Fear not the First Amendment includes your comedy act. If someone were to
try and close your fact free folklore blog I would come to your defense. ( People who
can not spell defense should not call others illiterate).
Yes the Constitution protects idiots and people who would be best served by posting less. The sad part about the Recidivist is he has no clue as to how stupid he looks
to educated people.
He has claimed there is no Jewish ethnicity and talks of a Palestinian Ethnicity.
Yet lets do a closer comedic look at this farce.
Jews 5000 year historical identity
Distinct Language Hebrew
Religious Identity Unique
Palestinian 41 Years founded by Nasser in Egypt
Language Arabic ( Hardly Unique)
Religion ( Sunni Arab hardly unique )
Egyptian Copt 6000 year Historical Identity
Language (Yes used in prayer )
Religion ( Unique)
The Copts are the indigenous people of Egypt. They
are not Arab and quickly point this out.They suffer
daily and the self righteous left say zero
Assyrians 4000 Year History
Language Unique
Religion Unique
They are the indigenous people of Northern Iraq
They have been persecuted for generations.
Words said by the clueless left on Assyrians
Brooklynites 300years
Language Regional Dialect
Religion various
There is a reason that there never was a nation of Brooklyn. The reason is that it was part of a larger entity . The entire notion of a Brooklyn people would be absurd.
People who are Brooklynites are NYC residents and American Citizens. I will reconstruct a myth. There were the original residents the Canarsie Indians. They have been there for a thousand years. The connection of the current residents to the
Canarsie Indians is zero. They do not speak the Canarsie language or practice the Canarsie way of life or religion.
However this point is lost on the clueless Recidivist. The PLO charter calls for Arab unity. The call is not linguistic and there are numerous references to Palestinian Arabs. The reason is obvious they are generic Arabs and not indigenous to Israel. They are colonial invaders on soil that does not belong to them in a varity of areas.
The following people have better cases for nationhood Basques, Scotts, Tartars , Pastuns, Kurds, Various African and American Indian tribes,Baluchis, Karen,Tibetian,
and Druze. News flash the the Recidivist Druze are Arabs with a unique religion.
For someone who does not read this blog you spend a great amount of time responding to things we write here. I stand by my assertion you are a bigot without a clue. If Jews fall into every racial category how is it a racist state ? There is no Muslim or Arab race and your comments are the product of a lack of education. Kindly pick up a book and use it.
The fact that you rant and focus all your venom on the worlds only Jewish State to the exclusion of all others speaks for itself.
arrogance. Fear not the First Amendment includes your comedy act. If someone were to
try and close your fact free folklore blog I would come to your defense. ( People who
can not spell defense should not call others illiterate).
Yes the Constitution protects idiots and people who would be best served by posting less. The sad part about the Recidivist is he has no clue as to how stupid he looks
to educated people.
He has claimed there is no Jewish ethnicity and talks of a Palestinian Ethnicity.
Yet lets do a closer comedic look at this farce.
Jews 5000 year historical identity
Distinct Language Hebrew
Religious Identity Unique
Palestinian 41 Years founded by Nasser in Egypt
Language Arabic ( Hardly Unique)
Religion ( Sunni Arab hardly unique )
Egyptian Copt 6000 year Historical Identity
Language (Yes used in prayer )
Religion ( Unique)
The Copts are the indigenous people of Egypt. They
are not Arab and quickly point this out.They suffer
daily and the self righteous left say zero
Assyrians 4000 Year History
Language Unique
Religion Unique
They are the indigenous people of Northern Iraq
They have been persecuted for generations.
Words said by the clueless left on Assyrians
Brooklynites 300years
Language Regional Dialect
Religion various
There is a reason that there never was a nation of Brooklyn. The reason is that it was part of a larger entity . The entire notion of a Brooklyn people would be absurd.
People who are Brooklynites are NYC residents and American Citizens. I will reconstruct a myth. There were the original residents the Canarsie Indians. They have been there for a thousand years. The connection of the current residents to the
Canarsie Indians is zero. They do not speak the Canarsie language or practice the Canarsie way of life or religion.
However this point is lost on the clueless Recidivist. The PLO charter calls for Arab unity. The call is not linguistic and there are numerous references to Palestinian Arabs. The reason is obvious they are generic Arabs and not indigenous to Israel. They are colonial invaders on soil that does not belong to them in a varity of areas.
The following people have better cases for nationhood Basques, Scotts, Tartars , Pastuns, Kurds, Various African and American Indian tribes,Baluchis, Karen,Tibetian,
and Druze. News flash the the Recidivist Druze are Arabs with a unique religion.
For someone who does not read this blog you spend a great amount of time responding to things we write here. I stand by my assertion you are a bigot without a clue. If Jews fall into every racial category how is it a racist state ? There is no Muslim or Arab race and your comments are the product of a lack of education. Kindly pick up a book and use it.
The fact that you rant and focus all your venom on the worlds only Jewish State to the exclusion of all others speaks for itself.
More Coverage from Non Readers (Recidivist)
I am amazed how someone who claims not to read my illiterate blog spends so much time
and on my blog. I should get a production credit but being that it is fact and source free you can keep the kudos
The Lesser Skilled Trollus Zionistus Minimus
He offers comedic critique
1 Provide a link to a zionist propoganda site where the prescripted lie is available but generally still unsubstantiated. ( But you will never find the fact anywhere else in the literate world )
This is hysterical when it comes from a person that provides no sources. He also does not provide examples of his claim.
2Provides a broken link
read one
3 Povide a link and Paraphrase any conclusion incorrectly in the hope you wont look too closely
read one
4 Pretend that you haven't challenged him and move the discussion on- normaly to some other unrelated conflict or to some sweeping generalization about Muslims,Muslim
Countries, the left wing treachery against your country.
It is called demonstrating hypocritical double standards and history. He also does not provide examples
5 Dissmiss your challenge as being motivated by bigotry or based on folklore( in other words avoids answering )
Your hypocrisy and various bigotries were well doccumented. Warren broke down the quotes and I worked on your pattern of double standards.
Unsubstantiated claims with no sources that contradict history and proven sources are charitably described as folk lore. You have yet to challenge anything and need more help.
In another brain impaired post the Recidivist post a story about a Russian who wants to emigrate to Australia. Left unmentioned are the one third of French Jews who are considering going to Israel to avoid self righteous bigots like the Recidivist. Also not mentioned are the Falash Mura who waited years to get into Israel and are black.
Not mentioned are the Shinlung who are also applying to come to Israel and they are Asian. That refutes the idiotic racist charge.
and on my blog. I should get a production credit but being that it is fact and source free you can keep the kudos
The Lesser Skilled Trollus Zionistus Minimus
He offers comedic critique
1 Provide a link to a zionist propoganda site where the prescripted lie is available but generally still unsubstantiated. ( But you will never find the fact anywhere else in the literate world )
This is hysterical when it comes from a person that provides no sources. He also does not provide examples of his claim.
2Provides a broken link
read one
3 Povide a link and Paraphrase any conclusion incorrectly in the hope you wont look too closely
read one
4 Pretend that you haven't challenged him and move the discussion on- normaly to some other unrelated conflict or to some sweeping generalization about Muslims,Muslim
Countries, the left wing treachery against your country.
It is called demonstrating hypocritical double standards and history. He also does not provide examples
5 Dissmiss your challenge as being motivated by bigotry or based on folklore( in other words avoids answering )
Your hypocrisy and various bigotries were well doccumented. Warren broke down the quotes and I worked on your pattern of double standards.
Unsubstantiated claims with no sources that contradict history and proven sources are charitably described as folk lore. You have yet to challenge anything and need more help.
In another brain impaired post the Recidivist post a story about a Russian who wants to emigrate to Australia. Left unmentioned are the one third of French Jews who are considering going to Israel to avoid self righteous bigots like the Recidivist. Also not mentioned are the Falash Mura who waited years to get into Israel and are black.
Not mentioned are the Shinlung who are also applying to come to Israel and they are Asian. That refutes the idiotic racist charge.
The Recidivist Actually Used A Source Hooray
Not content to be source free the Recidivist uses the musings of a far left " EcoSocialist " . He had a perfect record of being fact and source free. Well he is still fact free so send out the marching band.
He make an odd attempt to justify a series of bigoted comments on my blog . His contention was that American Joooooos are paranoid not like the European Jooooooos
who know their place. Warren documented the whole thing much better than I .
So he produces a good joooooooo. A far left extreemist who is the "Alger Hiss chair"
at Bard college. Coulter points out in 1993 he wrote a book that claimed anti communism was a mental disorder. Yet the next year the Venno cables made that claim moot.He claimed anti communism in america was a form of anti semitism. He also dedicated his book to Alger Hiss Communist Spy.
Red Hunting in the Promised Land"the communist became..the archaic blood villain of
Western Civilization-the Jew who killed Christ,the black Hamatic son of Noah,the howling savage beyond the gates reminding 100% of Americans of the terrors of the dark". I guess "100,000,000" dead according to the Black book of Communism is not enough to be upset over.
Lets add this one up according to Kovell . Anti Communism is a mental illness. Anti Communism is a form of antisemitism. Jews who feel Anti Zionism is Aanti semitic are paranoid. Kovel is illucid and is second rate comedic material. The fact that the Recidivist picks a laughing stock to cover bigoted statements is hilarious.
Who will he quote next "Lynne Stewart, Groucho Marx , Karl Marx or Mickey Mouse ?
He make an odd attempt to justify a series of bigoted comments on my blog . His contention was that American Joooooos are paranoid not like the European Jooooooos
who know their place. Warren documented the whole thing much better than I .
So he produces a good joooooooo. A far left extreemist who is the "Alger Hiss chair"
at Bard college. Coulter points out in 1993 he wrote a book that claimed anti communism was a mental disorder. Yet the next year the Venno cables made that claim moot.He claimed anti communism in america was a form of anti semitism. He also dedicated his book to Alger Hiss Communist Spy.
Red Hunting in the Promised Land"the communist became..the archaic blood villain of
Western Civilization-the Jew who killed Christ,the black Hamatic son of Noah,the howling savage beyond the gates reminding 100% of Americans of the terrors of the dark". I guess "100,000,000" dead according to the Black book of Communism is not enough to be upset over.
Lets add this one up according to Kovell . Anti Communism is a mental illness. Anti Communism is a form of antisemitism. Jews who feel Anti Zionism is Aanti semitic are paranoid. Kovel is illucid and is second rate comedic material. The fact that the Recidivist picks a laughing stock to cover bigoted statements is hilarious.
Who will he quote next "Lynne Stewart, Groucho Marx , Karl Marx or Mickey Mouse ?
Monday, April 04, 2005
More Folklore , Spin from The Recidivist
For a person who doesn't read my blog I get covered there more than I do in my own blog. When one runs a facts free presentation sunlight and truth are dangerous. He has closed his blog to my comment and that of others who have challenged his spin and outright BS. His ususal response is to call me a troll, old, pathetic, bigot,racist . Rather than deal with genuine facts he cowardly closes his forum . The people that suffer are his readers and who are not being presented facts. They are being fed opinion, spin and at times bigotry.
Starting with Little Known Myth busting truths #3
No sources are listed in the entire post. This is a mix of folklore, spin and soft shoe tap dancing.In fact the only source he lists on series of posts is an obscure
extreeme left radical professor that will be dealt with later. This is one more source than he typically provides . All opinion , zero sources or facts and much crying about victim hood.
One can read the Truth about the Arab invasions in a variety of places. Lets Start with the Book Indigenous People under Islam by Fred P Isaac. Isaac is an Assyrian and details the invasions and brutal supression by a Jim Crow Dhimmi system. Http://www.secularislam.org/jihad / subjects.htm. One sees that the Arabs invaded Colonized ,Ethnocide and sometimes Genocide. The victims were not only Jews & Christians but included Hindus, Zoroastrians and Buddhists. There were a range of smaller people mistreated as well . Once can find a range of Articles on these subjects at Front Page magazine by Serge Trifkovic.
Jews, Christians and other minorities were never considered Arab. They lived under a series of Dhimmi Laws that were worse than Jim Crow. Read the post called do not be a Dhimmi in this blog.
Iraqi's are Arabs with the following exceptions, Kurds, Assyrians and Turkomen all of whom have a better case for nationhood than Palestinians. All of whom have their own distinct languages and the Assyrians a religion as well. They all exist for thousands of years with clear identity. The idigenous people of Egypt are Coptswho have an 8,000 year history and suffer persecution today under brutal Arab rule. Go to AMCOPIC.com for the truth. The Recidivist next word on the Coptics will be his first. Ignorance or convenient bigotry on the part of the Recidivist is anyones guess. Iranians are 51% Persian and Practice a different form of Islam but are even
more brutal towards minorities. Visit a Bha'i temple near you and ask but they are safe in Israel. Other persecuted minorities are Zoroastrians, Jews and Christians.
His assertations about the genetics of European Jews are refuted by science . Thus he provides zero sources for his folklore. Http://khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts.html
Askenazim ( European Jews) ,Sephardim, Mizrahim, Jururim,Italquim are Israelite. The Israelite halotype fall into groups J & E. There have been smaller bloodmixtures along the way. Lybian Jews are descended from Berbers ( read Fred Isaac)Ethiopian Jews ( mostly eithiopian). Palestinian Arabs probably partialy Isrealite. The reason for this is inverse as sexual slavery and forced conversions were common. This does not give the Palestinians any validity. The notion of a pure race is BS as armies went all over the place. The fact remains that Jews are indigenous and Palestinian Arabs are not. The studies that Jews are more closely related to Anatolians, Assyrians, Kurds point to the harassment doccumented by Isaac, Bat Yeor and Others.
Http://globalpolitician Palestinian genes show Arab , Jewish , European and Black African Ansectry. The Crusaders were is the area and sexual slavery was a part of Islamic History . Sword of the Prophet Trifkovic. Serialized at Front Page Magazine.
The Recidivist is disingenuous with the facts abouth the PLO charter. The references
to Arab unity are not calls for linguistic unity.
Http://www.pna.gov.ps/government/gov/plo_Charter.asp
Article13 Arab unity and the liberation of Palestine are two complimentary objectives........ The Palestinians define themselves as Arabs in their own words.Nor is that a linguistic reference where is the cultural identity or religion. The religion is the same as Arabs Islam and the identity is 1964. All the states in the area are a creation of Sykes Picot. Jordan was created and expelled Jews who had lived there long before there was Islam. Palestine and Jordan were one country until
until the division in 1923. Allready in control of the majority of the land the Arabs
wanted all of it. 70% of the population of Jordan call themselves Palestinians.
In short the indigenous people were Jews and Christians. Arabs arrive in the seventh
century and opress idigenous people. The indigenous people are subject to Jim Crow laws and a few convert or intermarry. This is not a basis for ethnicity for a people
the Palestinians fail on a variety of levels linguistic , religious and an identity
starting in Egypt 1964. Compare this to Jews, Copts and Assyrians and there is zero case for nationhood.
There is zero connection between Biblical Philistines and "Palestinians". We debunked the genetic claims of the Recidivist.
Zero sources in his post several in mine.
Little Known Myth Busting Truths 2
Zero sources all opinion .
Every Poll ever taken stated the Jewish people overwhelmingly support the state of Israel. Jewish critics of Israel fall into two categories extreeme leftist radical , odd religious groups Satmar & Neturai Karta . Leftists radicals regardless of religion are seditious read the Venona Cables by Briendel.Their only aliegance is to whatever the party tells them. The Rosenburgs orphaned their children for the cause. This typifies the mentality of the extreeme left.
My charges of bigotry against the Recidivist will be adressed here. Professor Irwin Colter Identifies nine sets of behaviors that constitute the new antisemitism.
Political Anti Semitism
The deligitimization of the state of Israel. Recidivist guilty
Ideological Antisemitism
Zionism=Racism . Zionism = Aparthied Zionism= Nazism. Recidivist guilty on first two
Cultural Antisemitism The melange of attitudes, sentiments, and discourse of "fashionable" salon intellectuals. Recidivist guilty due to his arrogant self righteous tones. Only real intellectuals use facts and sorces.
Denial of Israel of equality before the law in the international arena. The singling out of Israel for differential and discriminatory treatment in the international arena. He has dedicated a disproportionate time on Israel and has said zero about a range of totalitarian and communist government Human rights abuses. He focuses of Israel a country with an excellent rating at Freedom House and says zero about countries with large scale human rights abuses China, Cuba , Zimbabwe all have never
been mentioned in his blog. He is a pathological bigot on and the case is clear. He has also made other bigoted quips on other subjects as well.
Little Known Myth Busting Number 1
No sources . Muslims have a series of ethnically cleansed states allready google demographics and look it up. The PA wants a Jeuden Frei West Bank. As Arabs colonialists they have zero legal standing. Jews were clearly there before the Arabs
who already have a Palestinian State Called Jordan.
We already provided sources that there clearly are genetic ties to a jewish people.
Islam is the ofical religion of the PA. Christians are being harassed by the Muslims and fleeing to Israel where they suffer no discrimination Http://www.falange.us/xtian-225.html I could easily cite dozens of more reports.
Arabs are not indigenous Jews and some Christians are.
On Zionist Racism and Trolls the recap.
No sources repeated poorly written charges. Claims 20 points lists 15 and gives the
variation of the same points several times. Several flagrant spelling errors but he calls other people illiterate.
1 A state whose express purpose is to serve and promote a specific ethnicity is by its definition Racist.
There are Jews in every racial category this makes this claim absurd. Poland, Lithuania, Germany and Russia all have laws similar to the right of return based upon
ethnicity. The only reason he points Israel out is he is a bigot.
2 Zioninism today is nothing more than a defence ( defense from a person who calls me illiterate )and expansion of a Jewish state for Jews- on its own term- no matter what cost to others. (He complains about my style of writing whoa)
Every other state in the region including the PA has an official religion Islam. The
fact that he alone points to Israel is bigotry again.Jews, Muslims, Christians , Druze ( they also call themselves Arab another mistake) and Baha'i worship freely in Israel.
3 Lengthy whining about UN resolutions and merciless punishment of Palestinians. Israel shows remarkable restraint Russia in Chechnya , USA in Falujah, Syria in Hamma
and Jordan in Black September have all dealt with similar situations mor harsly.
4 Poorly alluded claim that Israel expelled the Palestinians and another false claim
the the Palestinians are descended from the Phillistines.
Dershowiz Pg81 Benny ' there was no zionist policy to expell or intimidate them into flight". In any war civilians flee the fighting. 84 Morris " Arab commanders ordered villagers to evacuate" " Arab League peiodically endorsed such a move"
Dersowitz 84 Prime Minister of Syria Khalid al Azam " Since 1948 ...while it is we who made them leave... We brought disaster upon..Arab ( Note on ethnicity) refugees, by inviting them and putting pressure on them to leave. ...We rendered them dispossed. We exploited them.... all in this service of political purpose..
there is alsozero mention of the expulsion of Jews from Arab countris Http://www.meforum.org/pf.php?id=263. This was real ethnic cleansing by Arabs against Jews.The Recidivist is silent
5 Another poorly worded accusation of the founding fathers of ethnically cleansing.
Read above . The land was purchased from absentee landlords living in Beirut or Damascus. David ben Gurion "encouraged Israelis not to buy land from people who worked on it" Pg 25
6 Yada Yada Repetitive claim about the historical ties of " Palestinians " and their
tie tohistorical capital Jerusalem. Blaming Israel for the refugees siting in camps.
Jerusalem was never a capital except under Jewish rule. The province was governed mostly from Damascus and the residents percieved themselves as southern Syrians. Jerusalem is naver mentioned in the Koran and the Dome of the Rock was constucted on the holiest site in Islam due to an internal fued ( Joseph Farah). As early as 1920 Jews were the overwhelming majority there acording to the census. It was so important to Muslims that almost none resided there.
The repeatative claim that Isreal is responsible for the refugees is refuted in 4
7 Because it fails to admit that the minority indigenous Jewish Community in Palestine, that lived therefor the last 2000 years was an in indistinguishable people
from its Christian and Muslim bretheren. ( Run on sentence starting with because and this clown calls me illiterate)
The Jews have a distinct language , religion and historical identity. Muslims were Arabs who mistreated indigenous people Fred Isaac. They were not the same people and often prevented from returning to their anscestral lands by Islamic authorities. Jews and Christians were the indigenous people. The Arab muslims were not and invaded in the seventh century.
8 Incoherent whining about bigotry.
9 Repeated charge Israel is racially exclusive. Elsewhere he claims Jews do not contitute a race. More illucid ramblings from the Recidivist.
Jews have every racial and ethnic mix in their population so a racialy exclusive state is a farce. The statement was produced by an illiterate
He claims with zeroevidence the Palestinians have been there for 4000 years. Arabs invaded in the Seventh Century. There is zero connection between the Phillistines, Canaanites and Palestinians.
10 A poorly structured claim of revising history and racial superiority.
Jews are an ethnic group with genetic ties sourced earlier. Jews are from every race and Arabs have 22 countries to practice their culture , Jews have one.
Historical revisionism is comedic based upon a person that denies the Arab invasions,
uses zero evidence to tie Palestinians to Phillistines and Canaanites. Revisionist is someone unable to read the PLO charter with "Arab Unity" & "Palestinian Arab" and
claiming that Palestinians are not Arab.
11 More singling out Israel for unique critique.
The Copts and Assyrians live in countries with less Harmony. Unlike the Palestinians
they have been around for 4000 years and are clearly indigenous. The Russians are receptive to Chechen Identity, African Nations routinely have coutries with tribal friction. The Tibetians also live in a society that respects them. Yet the Jewish state is the only one pointed out. According to Freedom House it is at the top of the rankings.
We have done race and ethnic cleansing already .
12 It propogates itself as a democratic government yada yada that denies the rights
of minorities.
Israeli Arabs vote and have more freedoms in Israel than elsewhere go to Freedom House. Compare Israels freedoms to Turkey and Israel is rated freer.
13 Bad math. There is a Jewish majority in Israel.
14 Bizzare claim that Israel did not reclaim the desert.
They did and drained swamps and made numerous improvements to the land. This is comedic material.
15 Because it divides the world into those who are worth more and lessinto superior beings.
No all citizens vote in Israel regardless of race or religion. His system of superior beings does take place in communist countries . Party members are privaleged citizens. It occurs in Islamic countries where religious and ethnic minorities are discriminated against. Arabs have 22 home lands to choose from.
He claims there is no single Jewish ethnic identity and claims Palestinans are the
same people who simply chose the Islamic faith. Really ,genetic ties were established at the top and we provided a souce.Jews also have a religion, historical identity of over 5000 years and a language that is unique. Nobody chose Islam we provided articles and sources something the Recidivist asks for but never does.
He has used zero sources so far.
Zionism is the right to self determination of the Jewish people. Thus any word play
is a directly bigoted ruse. What other ethnic groups do not have the right to self
determination ? He applies one standard for Jews and none for anyone else.
Starting with Little Known Myth busting truths #3
No sources are listed in the entire post. This is a mix of folklore, spin and soft shoe tap dancing.In fact the only source he lists on series of posts is an obscure
extreeme left radical professor that will be dealt with later. This is one more source than he typically provides . All opinion , zero sources or facts and much crying about victim hood.
One can read the Truth about the Arab invasions in a variety of places. Lets Start with the Book Indigenous People under Islam by Fred P Isaac. Isaac is an Assyrian and details the invasions and brutal supression by a Jim Crow Dhimmi system. Http://www.secularislam.org/jihad / subjects.htm. One sees that the Arabs invaded Colonized ,Ethnocide and sometimes Genocide. The victims were not only Jews & Christians but included Hindus, Zoroastrians and Buddhists. There were a range of smaller people mistreated as well . Once can find a range of Articles on these subjects at Front Page magazine by Serge Trifkovic.
Jews, Christians and other minorities were never considered Arab. They lived under a series of Dhimmi Laws that were worse than Jim Crow. Read the post called do not be a Dhimmi in this blog.
Iraqi's are Arabs with the following exceptions, Kurds, Assyrians and Turkomen all of whom have a better case for nationhood than Palestinians. All of whom have their own distinct languages and the Assyrians a religion as well. They all exist for thousands of years with clear identity. The idigenous people of Egypt are Coptswho have an 8,000 year history and suffer persecution today under brutal Arab rule. Go to AMCOPIC.com for the truth. The Recidivist next word on the Coptics will be his first. Ignorance or convenient bigotry on the part of the Recidivist is anyones guess. Iranians are 51% Persian and Practice a different form of Islam but are even
more brutal towards minorities. Visit a Bha'i temple near you and ask but they are safe in Israel. Other persecuted minorities are Zoroastrians, Jews and Christians.
His assertations about the genetics of European Jews are refuted by science . Thus he provides zero sources for his folklore. Http://khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts.html
Askenazim ( European Jews) ,Sephardim, Mizrahim, Jururim,Italquim are Israelite. The Israelite halotype fall into groups J & E. There have been smaller bloodmixtures along the way. Lybian Jews are descended from Berbers ( read Fred Isaac)Ethiopian Jews ( mostly eithiopian). Palestinian Arabs probably partialy Isrealite. The reason for this is inverse as sexual slavery and forced conversions were common. This does not give the Palestinians any validity. The notion of a pure race is BS as armies went all over the place. The fact remains that Jews are indigenous and Palestinian Arabs are not. The studies that Jews are more closely related to Anatolians, Assyrians, Kurds point to the harassment doccumented by Isaac, Bat Yeor and Others.
Http://globalpolitician Palestinian genes show Arab , Jewish , European and Black African Ansectry. The Crusaders were is the area and sexual slavery was a part of Islamic History . Sword of the Prophet Trifkovic. Serialized at Front Page Magazine.
The Recidivist is disingenuous with the facts abouth the PLO charter. The references
to Arab unity are not calls for linguistic unity.
Http://www.pna.gov.ps/government/gov/plo_Charter.asp
Article13 Arab unity and the liberation of Palestine are two complimentary objectives........ The Palestinians define themselves as Arabs in their own words.Nor is that a linguistic reference where is the cultural identity or religion. The religion is the same as Arabs Islam and the identity is 1964. All the states in the area are a creation of Sykes Picot. Jordan was created and expelled Jews who had lived there long before there was Islam. Palestine and Jordan were one country until
until the division in 1923. Allready in control of the majority of the land the Arabs
wanted all of it. 70% of the population of Jordan call themselves Palestinians.
In short the indigenous people were Jews and Christians. Arabs arrive in the seventh
century and opress idigenous people. The indigenous people are subject to Jim Crow laws and a few convert or intermarry. This is not a basis for ethnicity for a people
the Palestinians fail on a variety of levels linguistic , religious and an identity
starting in Egypt 1964. Compare this to Jews, Copts and Assyrians and there is zero case for nationhood.
There is zero connection between Biblical Philistines and "Palestinians". We debunked the genetic claims of the Recidivist.
Zero sources in his post several in mine.
Little Known Myth Busting Truths 2
Zero sources all opinion .
Every Poll ever taken stated the Jewish people overwhelmingly support the state of Israel. Jewish critics of Israel fall into two categories extreeme leftist radical , odd religious groups Satmar & Neturai Karta . Leftists radicals regardless of religion are seditious read the Venona Cables by Briendel.Their only aliegance is to whatever the party tells them. The Rosenburgs orphaned their children for the cause. This typifies the mentality of the extreeme left.
My charges of bigotry against the Recidivist will be adressed here. Professor Irwin Colter Identifies nine sets of behaviors that constitute the new antisemitism.
Political Anti Semitism
The deligitimization of the state of Israel. Recidivist guilty
Ideological Antisemitism
Zionism=Racism . Zionism = Aparthied Zionism= Nazism. Recidivist guilty on first two
Cultural Antisemitism The melange of attitudes, sentiments, and discourse of "fashionable" salon intellectuals. Recidivist guilty due to his arrogant self righteous tones. Only real intellectuals use facts and sorces.
Denial of Israel of equality before the law in the international arena. The singling out of Israel for differential and discriminatory treatment in the international arena. He has dedicated a disproportionate time on Israel and has said zero about a range of totalitarian and communist government Human rights abuses. He focuses of Israel a country with an excellent rating at Freedom House and says zero about countries with large scale human rights abuses China, Cuba , Zimbabwe all have never
been mentioned in his blog. He is a pathological bigot on and the case is clear. He has also made other bigoted quips on other subjects as well.
Little Known Myth Busting Number 1
No sources . Muslims have a series of ethnically cleansed states allready google demographics and look it up. The PA wants a Jeuden Frei West Bank. As Arabs colonialists they have zero legal standing. Jews were clearly there before the Arabs
who already have a Palestinian State Called Jordan.
We already provided sources that there clearly are genetic ties to a jewish people.
Islam is the ofical religion of the PA. Christians are being harassed by the Muslims and fleeing to Israel where they suffer no discrimination Http://www.falange.us/xtian-225.html I could easily cite dozens of more reports.
Arabs are not indigenous Jews and some Christians are.
On Zionist Racism and Trolls the recap.
No sources repeated poorly written charges. Claims 20 points lists 15 and gives the
variation of the same points several times. Several flagrant spelling errors but he calls other people illiterate.
1 A state whose express purpose is to serve and promote a specific ethnicity is by its definition Racist.
There are Jews in every racial category this makes this claim absurd. Poland, Lithuania, Germany and Russia all have laws similar to the right of return based upon
ethnicity. The only reason he points Israel out is he is a bigot.
2 Zioninism today is nothing more than a defence ( defense from a person who calls me illiterate )and expansion of a Jewish state for Jews- on its own term- no matter what cost to others. (He complains about my style of writing whoa)
Every other state in the region including the PA has an official religion Islam. The
fact that he alone points to Israel is bigotry again.Jews, Muslims, Christians , Druze ( they also call themselves Arab another mistake) and Baha'i worship freely in Israel.
3 Lengthy whining about UN resolutions and merciless punishment of Palestinians. Israel shows remarkable restraint Russia in Chechnya , USA in Falujah, Syria in Hamma
and Jordan in Black September have all dealt with similar situations mor harsly.
4 Poorly alluded claim that Israel expelled the Palestinians and another false claim
the the Palestinians are descended from the Phillistines.
Dershowiz Pg81 Benny ' there was no zionist policy to expell or intimidate them into flight". In any war civilians flee the fighting. 84 Morris " Arab commanders ordered villagers to evacuate" " Arab League peiodically endorsed such a move"
Dersowitz 84 Prime Minister of Syria Khalid al Azam " Since 1948 ...while it is we who made them leave... We brought disaster upon..Arab ( Note on ethnicity) refugees, by inviting them and putting pressure on them to leave. ...We rendered them dispossed. We exploited them.... all in this service of political purpose..
there is alsozero mention of the expulsion of Jews from Arab countris Http://www.meforum.org/pf.php?id=263. This was real ethnic cleansing by Arabs against Jews.The Recidivist is silent
5 Another poorly worded accusation of the founding fathers of ethnically cleansing.
Read above . The land was purchased from absentee landlords living in Beirut or Damascus. David ben Gurion "encouraged Israelis not to buy land from people who worked on it" Pg 25
6 Yada Yada Repetitive claim about the historical ties of " Palestinians " and their
tie tohistorical capital Jerusalem. Blaming Israel for the refugees siting in camps.
Jerusalem was never a capital except under Jewish rule. The province was governed mostly from Damascus and the residents percieved themselves as southern Syrians. Jerusalem is naver mentioned in the Koran and the Dome of the Rock was constucted on the holiest site in Islam due to an internal fued ( Joseph Farah). As early as 1920 Jews were the overwhelming majority there acording to the census. It was so important to Muslims that almost none resided there.
The repeatative claim that Isreal is responsible for the refugees is refuted in 4
7 Because it fails to admit that the minority indigenous Jewish Community in Palestine, that lived therefor the last 2000 years was an in indistinguishable people
from its Christian and Muslim bretheren. ( Run on sentence starting with because and this clown calls me illiterate)
The Jews have a distinct language , religion and historical identity. Muslims were Arabs who mistreated indigenous people Fred Isaac. They were not the same people and often prevented from returning to their anscestral lands by Islamic authorities. Jews and Christians were the indigenous people. The Arab muslims were not and invaded in the seventh century.
8 Incoherent whining about bigotry.
9 Repeated charge Israel is racially exclusive. Elsewhere he claims Jews do not contitute a race. More illucid ramblings from the Recidivist.
Jews have every racial and ethnic mix in their population so a racialy exclusive state is a farce. The statement was produced by an illiterate
He claims with zeroevidence the Palestinians have been there for 4000 years. Arabs invaded in the Seventh Century. There is zero connection between the Phillistines, Canaanites and Palestinians.
10 A poorly structured claim of revising history and racial superiority.
Jews are an ethnic group with genetic ties sourced earlier. Jews are from every race and Arabs have 22 countries to practice their culture , Jews have one.
Historical revisionism is comedic based upon a person that denies the Arab invasions,
uses zero evidence to tie Palestinians to Phillistines and Canaanites. Revisionist is someone unable to read the PLO charter with "Arab Unity" & "Palestinian Arab" and
claiming that Palestinians are not Arab.
11 More singling out Israel for unique critique.
The Copts and Assyrians live in countries with less Harmony. Unlike the Palestinians
they have been around for 4000 years and are clearly indigenous. The Russians are receptive to Chechen Identity, African Nations routinely have coutries with tribal friction. The Tibetians also live in a society that respects them. Yet the Jewish state is the only one pointed out. According to Freedom House it is at the top of the rankings.
We have done race and ethnic cleansing already .
12 It propogates itself as a democratic government yada yada that denies the rights
of minorities.
Israeli Arabs vote and have more freedoms in Israel than elsewhere go to Freedom House. Compare Israels freedoms to Turkey and Israel is rated freer.
13 Bad math. There is a Jewish majority in Israel.
14 Bizzare claim that Israel did not reclaim the desert.
They did and drained swamps and made numerous improvements to the land. This is comedic material.
15 Because it divides the world into those who are worth more and lessinto superior beings.
No all citizens vote in Israel regardless of race or religion. His system of superior beings does take place in communist countries . Party members are privaleged citizens. It occurs in Islamic countries where religious and ethnic minorities are discriminated against. Arabs have 22 home lands to choose from.
He claims there is no single Jewish ethnic identity and claims Palestinans are the
same people who simply chose the Islamic faith. Really ,genetic ties were established at the top and we provided a souce.Jews also have a religion, historical identity of over 5000 years and a language that is unique. Nobody chose Islam we provided articles and sources something the Recidivist asks for but never does.
He has used zero sources so far.
Zionism is the right to self determination of the Jewish people. Thus any word play
is a directly bigoted ruse. What other ethnic groups do not have the right to self
determination ? He applies one standard for Jews and none for anyone else.
Responsilble Blogs and Posting
There is a profound difference between a well run factual Blog and the ramblings of
a delusion marntinet. There are plenty of opinions in Blogs but they should be based
in fact. The poster should stand behind his work and defend it. It is easy to cater to an empty head audience but a good blog has dissent. This is what distiguishes a good blog from that of a hack.
The comedic Recidivist claims I want to silence him and discredit him.I have never advocated silencing anyone. As an American I understand and practice the first amendment. I may disagree with a post but the discredit part comes from his own reactions to critique.He discredits himself by avoiding comments that challenge his
own posts. His readership is also not served by his totalitarian ethos. I have endured far more personal attacks than he has. There is no crying in the Blogosphere
and I have responded to those comments. He cries and then calls me a racist, bigot,
liar, hypocrite and tries to claim censorship. He provides no quotes for these claims
but that is the way he runs his blog all opinion and zero facts. He is now trying to
be a victim of a campaign to discredit him and silence him. How does one silence somebody in the blogosphere ? I suppose I coud list his site on Free Republic and encourage people to voice their concerns. However this would not be ethical and I would not do it . Even that would not silence a blog but it would annoy one.
Here is how a responsible liberal adresses critique. I am a fan of David Horowitz who
has read some posts on this blog. Http://thedisgruntled.blogspot.com/2005/03/now-i-just-feel-sorry-for-horowitz.html
I asked seven tough but fair questions. The Chemist and a reader Rhetorician rose to
the challenge. No labels ,no crying and great reading.
1 Have you visited the Archives of DTN ?
2 How many Horowitz books have you read ?
3 Would a similar reference to a liberal as a blow up doll in my blog be sexist ?
(That was the toughest question)
4 Does the public have a right to know who is behind ANSWER, Code Pink etc.
5 Are Noam Chomsky and Raimondo above critique ?
6 Does Horowitz have the same right to free speech as you or I .
7 If he percieves a pattern of Anti Israel mania does he have a right to express his
views
The first response is from the Rhetorician. He affirmed his commitment to free speech for every one with the " possibility of critique ". His concern that Horowitz
and Coulter are creating paranoia. He feels the Student bill of rights is an attempt to silence the left. He does not perceive that liberals are anti- Jew or Israel. He
sees this as an attempt to get Jews to vote Republican
The Chemist gave an excellent response. He has visited DTN and disargees.He has not read any Horowitz books. He is not a fan of PC. The Public should be informed but points out an example of what he terms an unfair attack by DTN on the ACLU. He agrees
that everybody work should be critique. He affirms everyone's right to free speech. He disagrees with me on the anti Israel mania but defers to other posters.
The above comments are the assessment of people I disagree with yet we share common
themes. Everybody has the right of free speech including Michael Moore, Chomsky, Coulter, Horrowitz and you. We have a right to react to those words in an appropriate manner. Those are the key points of difference between a liberal and a leftist radical totalitarian. I like and respect liberals they are my friends and family. I agree with them on several issues and disagree with them on others. We share a common belief on a variety of levels. Speech codes on colleges come from the left and are totalitarian methods of crowd control. Had the Chemist made the blow up
doll remark on some campuses he would have had problems. I also would be first in line to defend him or even the Recidivist if they were silenced.
Richard Poe advised me that if this blog were targeted by Nazis, Communists I would have hard choices . I have had the opportunity to witness this first hand. I am commited as never before to freedom of speech. The extent of the critique 90% you are a bigot, hypocrite,liar,right wing fanatic and trying to discredit and silence muslims and their leftist allies. It would have been nice if they adressed any of my points. The facts are they can not refute the points so they resort to victimhood and censorship. Were Nazis to come here I would use them for comic relief. Speaking
of comic failures Nemesis do stop in. Make a lengthy post and I will be glad to poke fun at your failed sad act. You have the most illucid blog I have encountered.
The Chemist, Rhetorician and the Recidivist demonstrated Horowitz's point in action.
The Chemist and Rhetorician played the role of responsible accademics. They were challenged we agree on some points disagree on others. This is what responsible conservatives and liberals do . No labels everyone makes their point and nobody is vilified. Sadly, the self righteous and condescending tones are what Israel supporters ,Jews and Conservatives face each day. The radicals bully and attempt to smear and question the motives of the challengers.
In a future post I will have to adress free speech and the workplace. This is at the
core of the accademic Bill of rights. I will also have to adress education vs indoctrintion. The problem is professionalism and we need it in the blogospere as well.
a delusion marntinet. There are plenty of opinions in Blogs but they should be based
in fact. The poster should stand behind his work and defend it. It is easy to cater to an empty head audience but a good blog has dissent. This is what distiguishes a good blog from that of a hack.
The comedic Recidivist claims I want to silence him and discredit him.I have never advocated silencing anyone. As an American I understand and practice the first amendment. I may disagree with a post but the discredit part comes from his own reactions to critique.He discredits himself by avoiding comments that challenge his
own posts. His readership is also not served by his totalitarian ethos. I have endured far more personal attacks than he has. There is no crying in the Blogosphere
and I have responded to those comments. He cries and then calls me a racist, bigot,
liar, hypocrite and tries to claim censorship. He provides no quotes for these claims
but that is the way he runs his blog all opinion and zero facts. He is now trying to
be a victim of a campaign to discredit him and silence him. How does one silence somebody in the blogosphere ? I suppose I coud list his site on Free Republic and encourage people to voice their concerns. However this would not be ethical and I would not do it . Even that would not silence a blog but it would annoy one.
Here is how a responsible liberal adresses critique. I am a fan of David Horowitz who
has read some posts on this blog. Http://thedisgruntled.blogspot.com/2005/03/now-i-just-feel-sorry-for-horowitz.html
I asked seven tough but fair questions. The Chemist and a reader Rhetorician rose to
the challenge. No labels ,no crying and great reading.
1 Have you visited the Archives of DTN ?
2 How many Horowitz books have you read ?
3 Would a similar reference to a liberal as a blow up doll in my blog be sexist ?
(That was the toughest question)
4 Does the public have a right to know who is behind ANSWER, Code Pink etc.
5 Are Noam Chomsky and Raimondo above critique ?
6 Does Horowitz have the same right to free speech as you or I .
7 If he percieves a pattern of Anti Israel mania does he have a right to express his
views
The first response is from the Rhetorician. He affirmed his commitment to free speech for every one with the " possibility of critique ". His concern that Horowitz
and Coulter are creating paranoia. He feels the Student bill of rights is an attempt to silence the left. He does not perceive that liberals are anti- Jew or Israel. He
sees this as an attempt to get Jews to vote Republican
The Chemist gave an excellent response. He has visited DTN and disargees.He has not read any Horowitz books. He is not a fan of PC. The Public should be informed but points out an example of what he terms an unfair attack by DTN on the ACLU. He agrees
that everybody work should be critique. He affirms everyone's right to free speech. He disagrees with me on the anti Israel mania but defers to other posters.
The above comments are the assessment of people I disagree with yet we share common
themes. Everybody has the right of free speech including Michael Moore, Chomsky, Coulter, Horrowitz and you. We have a right to react to those words in an appropriate manner. Those are the key points of difference between a liberal and a leftist radical totalitarian. I like and respect liberals they are my friends and family. I agree with them on several issues and disagree with them on others. We share a common belief on a variety of levels. Speech codes on colleges come from the left and are totalitarian methods of crowd control. Had the Chemist made the blow up
doll remark on some campuses he would have had problems. I also would be first in line to defend him or even the Recidivist if they were silenced.
Richard Poe advised me that if this blog were targeted by Nazis, Communists I would have hard choices . I have had the opportunity to witness this first hand. I am commited as never before to freedom of speech. The extent of the critique 90% you are a bigot, hypocrite,liar,right wing fanatic and trying to discredit and silence muslims and their leftist allies. It would have been nice if they adressed any of my points. The facts are they can not refute the points so they resort to victimhood and censorship. Were Nazis to come here I would use them for comic relief. Speaking
of comic failures Nemesis do stop in. Make a lengthy post and I will be glad to poke fun at your failed sad act. You have the most illucid blog I have encountered.
The Chemist, Rhetorician and the Recidivist demonstrated Horowitz's point in action.
The Chemist and Rhetorician played the role of responsible accademics. They were challenged we agree on some points disagree on others. This is what responsible conservatives and liberals do . No labels everyone makes their point and nobody is vilified. Sadly, the self righteous and condescending tones are what Israel supporters ,Jews and Conservatives face each day. The radicals bully and attempt to smear and question the motives of the challengers.
In a future post I will have to adress free speech and the workplace. This is at the
core of the accademic Bill of rights. I will also have to adress education vs indoctrintion. The problem is professionalism and we need it in the blogospere as well.
Sunday, April 03, 2005
Cowardly Recidivist Proves Horowitz is right.Thanks
The left likes to talk about free speech and tollerance. My reference is to the totalitarian variety typified by the Recidivist. This is distinct from a mainstream
liberal as we both celebrate free speech. If you have an opinion have the courage to back it up. This is what is the basic core of a democracy rests on,
I find it odd that the Recidivist rails against Horowitz and the accademic bill of rights. His behavior clearly demonstrates why such a reform is needed. Speech codes and censorship are used by the left on colleges. Faculty much like the Recidivist want to present their versions unchallenged. This is not education but indoctrination
and an abuse of power. As far as the Cowardly Recidivist he owns his blog as I own this one. Yet I do not hide and welcome challenges to my points. There is zero need for censorship here as we can back our statements with fact. I do not need to frame an argument with no Palestinian propoganda. I have the historical facts and can back them up.
The problem is that the left can not make its case at times and is not used to a challenge. The Recidivist framed a disingenuous debate on the subject of a Palestinian ethnicity. He allows no Zionist Propoganda, No discussion of Islamic history or any other nationalities in a debate. He is not interested in facts or history because they are meaningless in his world. I think the PLO charter contains
numerous references to Palestinian Arabs and Arab unity clarify this issue . The Palestinians call themselves Arabs but the Recidivist knows more than the PLO charter.
An honest discussion of this issue requires looking at Islamic history, sociology and
Sykes Picot. It is entirely relevant that the Arabs invaded and opressed a range of indigenous people. It is relevant that these indigenous minorities have their own language,religion and thousand year identity. The Arabs (Palestinians) lack all three and date back to 1964 in Egypt. If the Palestinians are generic Arabs then they have been used not by Israel but by their Arab bretheren as hockey pucks.
I was not surprised when the cowardly Recidivist banned me from his fact free site.
He likes opinions so long as they agree with his own "This is what happens when you have a semi-illiterate President who comes under the influence of religious fundamentaist fruitcakes ...All aboard, this is the 9-11 to Sharia Law".When challenged on the biases of the statement ...."You may not like that, but I will continue to excersize my freedom of speech against the poisonous little inbred." He cites his own Freedom of speech but denies it to others.
This is the final exchange where I get banned
Http://recidivistsjournals.blogspot.com/2005/03/oh-lordy.html
Viper : A joke reference to Sharia is inexcusable whilst it is also inexcusable to censor your nasty brand of racism ?
Dude , you are too F-ked up . You are no gentleman . You are an insincere liar.
You are rife with hatred of Muslims, Arabs and Palestinians. You may be a domestic moderate , but you are an international extreemist racist.
You say that you don't want to silence , but that is a lie. You want to silence anyone who does not agree with your racist agenda,
(3 Racist claims, 1 hatred claim and two liar claims . Viper, Craig , Mark Jordan and the Recidivist make these claims with no quotes, factual errors, or backing. Disappointingly , Viper misses the word Hypocrite that he likes bandy most of the time. I had a hard time restraining the laughter when he complains about Warren snipping. He has been doing that for weeks in the comment section. The next point he raises will be his first.)
My Resonse Viper
I do not wish to silence anyone as any blog is a celebration of the First Amendment. The Sharia quip was stupid and silly.
Your charges of racism have zero basis as Arabs, Muslims nor "Palestinians" constitute a race.
The use of Islamic and Arab history is relevant in any discussion about Palestine. The person trying to censor is you. Framing a discussion sans Zionist propaganda is a disingenous front. The PLO charter contains numerous references to Palestinian Arabs and Arab Unity.
Labeling facts as propoganda is subjective at best. Rather than play that game serious intellectuals do not play that game. They discuss facts and history but the radicals have a disdain for facts.
Recidivist said
Beakerkin, that unfortunately is just your point of view.
The view of this blog owner is that you are a rancid racist hypocrite and that everything you say is unnecessary and silly. So much so that you are now officially
banned from this blog as being a hateful distraction who is a waste of time and space...or more precisely you are banned because I say you are and there is bugger all that you can do about it.
I want to point out he has never found a single quote that is anti muslim. Nor have any of his friends or followers. They have combed this site looking but I talk about history, sociology and facts. Rather than adress the facts the left hides behind labels. They call you a liar and a hypocrite and never demonstrate it. You are called a racist and bigot with no quotes.
This is exactly what occurs in universities across America. The self righteous left does not allow any real discussion of the Palestine issue. In Academia the intollerant professors act the same way the Recidivist did except they attempt to use
facts. They do not like their work scrutinized but they readily do it to others. They
readily attempt to question the motives of the critics .
The leftist critics in accademia hold Western Civ, America and Israel to impossibly high standards. Yet they say zero about the evils of Islamic Civ that are exactly the same as Western Civ. They are silent about abuses in muslim, communist and third world countries. They practice real hypocrisy each and every day. The Recidivist did take a trip to Freedom House and did not Israel has a better record than most nations. His response was dismissive you don't here me excusing it. He also has not
said one word about human rights abuses in Muslim countries. However his anti Zionist
diatribes are daily features. I am not a bigot but I devote disproportionate space to Israel and Jews who disagree with me. The vast majority of Jews support Israel in every poll.
The arrogance of the Recidivist matches what we see in accademia ..."or more precisely because I say you are and there is bugger all that you can do about it "
I want to thank the Recidivist once again for illustrating David Horowitz is right. The extreeme left is decidely self righteous , hypocritical, bigoted and intollerant.
The motto on the extreeme left should be free speech for me and none for thee.
An Addition to the whinning Recidivist
Http://recidivistjournals.blogspot.com/2005/04message-to-windbag-troll.html
Breakdown 5 cries of racism 1 whimper hypocitical 2 illiterate.3 cries of censorship.
Speaking of illiteracy there are typos mispellings in the Recidivists own blog. However he has a distinct reading comprehension problem.I have never called to censor
his blog or anyone elses. If I disagree I point out where . Some may not be up to scruitiny but we are here. We have had plenty of critical visits and not one factual error found in my posts.My posts list their sources and I list the pages. Not one fact has been refuted in about 60 posts from him and his accolytes.If fact they have been demolished here.
He cries racism but Warren readily exposed his blatant anti Jewish and Israel musings. Warren was also not allowed to comment as the Recidivist turned off the comments. He runs a fact free blog and the Muslims might be interested in his views
on organized religion.
His latest cry is that I am trying to discredit the left and Muslims. His own fact free blog does more to achieve that end than an army of Beakerkin. My blog has been
linked by Richard Poe editor of Moonbat Central. Donal has verified the email from
Horowitz requesting a post. David Yeagley mentions it on his blog. Stephen Schwartz
sent in a correction on a post and I made it.
A blogger Amicus Currae told the Recidivist if my comments were full of racism he should show it.By removing it it gives the appearance of hiding. The truth were his arguments were destroyed twice . Once by me and the other time by Warren. If real racism was there he would leave and point to it. The fact is he has no quotes and deletes the posts that make him look absurd.
How does his claim of a Palestinian ethnicity stand up to scrutiny if the PLO charter is loaded with the terms Palestinian Arabs and Arab unity ? This makes his claim that the Palestinians are distinct from Arabs laughable.
Horowitz proven right once again.Thanks Recidivist
liberal as we both celebrate free speech. If you have an opinion have the courage to back it up. This is what is the basic core of a democracy rests on,
I find it odd that the Recidivist rails against Horowitz and the accademic bill of rights. His behavior clearly demonstrates why such a reform is needed. Speech codes and censorship are used by the left on colleges. Faculty much like the Recidivist want to present their versions unchallenged. This is not education but indoctrination
and an abuse of power. As far as the Cowardly Recidivist he owns his blog as I own this one. Yet I do not hide and welcome challenges to my points. There is zero need for censorship here as we can back our statements with fact. I do not need to frame an argument with no Palestinian propoganda. I have the historical facts and can back them up.
The problem is that the left can not make its case at times and is not used to a challenge. The Recidivist framed a disingenuous debate on the subject of a Palestinian ethnicity. He allows no Zionist Propoganda, No discussion of Islamic history or any other nationalities in a debate. He is not interested in facts or history because they are meaningless in his world. I think the PLO charter contains
numerous references to Palestinian Arabs and Arab unity clarify this issue . The Palestinians call themselves Arabs but the Recidivist knows more than the PLO charter.
An honest discussion of this issue requires looking at Islamic history, sociology and
Sykes Picot. It is entirely relevant that the Arabs invaded and opressed a range of indigenous people. It is relevant that these indigenous minorities have their own language,religion and thousand year identity. The Arabs (Palestinians) lack all three and date back to 1964 in Egypt. If the Palestinians are generic Arabs then they have been used not by Israel but by their Arab bretheren as hockey pucks.
I was not surprised when the cowardly Recidivist banned me from his fact free site.
He likes opinions so long as they agree with his own "This is what happens when you have a semi-illiterate President who comes under the influence of religious fundamentaist fruitcakes ...All aboard, this is the 9-11 to Sharia Law".When challenged on the biases of the statement ...."You may not like that, but I will continue to excersize my freedom of speech against the poisonous little inbred." He cites his own Freedom of speech but denies it to others.
This is the final exchange where I get banned
Http://recidivistsjournals.blogspot.com/2005/03/oh-lordy.html
Viper : A joke reference to Sharia is inexcusable whilst it is also inexcusable to censor your nasty brand of racism ?
Dude , you are too F-ked up . You are no gentleman . You are an insincere liar.
You are rife with hatred of Muslims, Arabs and Palestinians. You may be a domestic moderate , but you are an international extreemist racist.
You say that you don't want to silence , but that is a lie. You want to silence anyone who does not agree with your racist agenda,
(3 Racist claims, 1 hatred claim and two liar claims . Viper, Craig , Mark Jordan and the Recidivist make these claims with no quotes, factual errors, or backing. Disappointingly , Viper misses the word Hypocrite that he likes bandy most of the time. I had a hard time restraining the laughter when he complains about Warren snipping. He has been doing that for weeks in the comment section. The next point he raises will be his first.)
My Resonse Viper
I do not wish to silence anyone as any blog is a celebration of the First Amendment. The Sharia quip was stupid and silly.
Your charges of racism have zero basis as Arabs, Muslims nor "Palestinians" constitute a race.
The use of Islamic and Arab history is relevant in any discussion about Palestine. The person trying to censor is you. Framing a discussion sans Zionist propaganda is a disingenous front. The PLO charter contains numerous references to Palestinian Arabs and Arab Unity.
Labeling facts as propoganda is subjective at best. Rather than play that game serious intellectuals do not play that game. They discuss facts and history but the radicals have a disdain for facts.
Recidivist said
Beakerkin, that unfortunately is just your point of view.
The view of this blog owner is that you are a rancid racist hypocrite and that everything you say is unnecessary and silly. So much so that you are now officially
banned from this blog as being a hateful distraction who is a waste of time and space...or more precisely you are banned because I say you are and there is bugger all that you can do about it.
I want to point out he has never found a single quote that is anti muslim. Nor have any of his friends or followers. They have combed this site looking but I talk about history, sociology and facts. Rather than adress the facts the left hides behind labels. They call you a liar and a hypocrite and never demonstrate it. You are called a racist and bigot with no quotes.
This is exactly what occurs in universities across America. The self righteous left does not allow any real discussion of the Palestine issue. In Academia the intollerant professors act the same way the Recidivist did except they attempt to use
facts. They do not like their work scrutinized but they readily do it to others. They
readily attempt to question the motives of the critics .
The leftist critics in accademia hold Western Civ, America and Israel to impossibly high standards. Yet they say zero about the evils of Islamic Civ that are exactly the same as Western Civ. They are silent about abuses in muslim, communist and third world countries. They practice real hypocrisy each and every day. The Recidivist did take a trip to Freedom House and did not Israel has a better record than most nations. His response was dismissive you don't here me excusing it. He also has not
said one word about human rights abuses in Muslim countries. However his anti Zionist
diatribes are daily features. I am not a bigot but I devote disproportionate space to Israel and Jews who disagree with me. The vast majority of Jews support Israel in every poll.
The arrogance of the Recidivist matches what we see in accademia ..."or more precisely because I say you are and there is bugger all that you can do about it "
I want to thank the Recidivist once again for illustrating David Horowitz is right. The extreeme left is decidely self righteous , hypocritical, bigoted and intollerant.
The motto on the extreeme left should be free speech for me and none for thee.
An Addition to the whinning Recidivist
Http://recidivistjournals.blogspot.com/2005/04message-to-windbag-troll.html
Breakdown 5 cries of racism 1 whimper hypocitical 2 illiterate.3 cries of censorship.
Speaking of illiteracy there are typos mispellings in the Recidivists own blog. However he has a distinct reading comprehension problem.I have never called to censor
his blog or anyone elses. If I disagree I point out where . Some may not be up to scruitiny but we are here. We have had plenty of critical visits and not one factual error found in my posts.My posts list their sources and I list the pages. Not one fact has been refuted in about 60 posts from him and his accolytes.If fact they have been demolished here.
He cries racism but Warren readily exposed his blatant anti Jewish and Israel musings. Warren was also not allowed to comment as the Recidivist turned off the comments. He runs a fact free blog and the Muslims might be interested in his views
on organized religion.
His latest cry is that I am trying to discredit the left and Muslims. His own fact free blog does more to achieve that end than an army of Beakerkin. My blog has been
linked by Richard Poe editor of Moonbat Central. Donal has verified the email from
Horowitz requesting a post. David Yeagley mentions it on his blog. Stephen Schwartz
sent in a correction on a post and I made it.
A blogger Amicus Currae told the Recidivist if my comments were full of racism he should show it.By removing it it gives the appearance of hiding. The truth were his arguments were destroyed twice . Once by me and the other time by Warren. If real racism was there he would leave and point to it. The fact is he has no quotes and deletes the posts that make him look absurd.
How does his claim of a Palestinian ethnicity stand up to scrutiny if the PLO charter is loaded with the terms Palestinian Arabs and Arab unity ? This makes his claim that the Palestinians are distinct from Arabs laughable.
Horowitz proven right once again.Thanks Recidivist
Don't be a Dhimmi
Lost in the discussion over Israel/Palsetine is the story of 1300 years of Jim Crow. This Jim Crow culture was loosened and tightened over time. There is the assumption
that Muslims have been where they are currently. Authors Fred P Isaac and Alvin Schmidtt describe the conquest and subjugation of ethnicities.
Therefore when a person makes a claim that the "Palestinians deserve a state he is litteraly endorsing 1300 years of colonialism against an indigenous population . The
blatant hypocrisy is that real indigenous people are being deprived of nation status.
Assyrians and Egyptian Coptics like Jews have their own language, religion and historical identity dating back 4000 years. The Kurds have their own language and historical identity dating back 3000 years.
The short version that the Palestinians are generic Arabs are based on 4 points. 1
Palestinians speak Arabic the same as Arabs elsewhere. 2 Palestinian largely worship
Sunni Islam the same as Saudis,most of Syria, Jordan and the Sunni triangle. 3 Cultural Identity 1964 founded in Egypt by Nasser with a Marxist Charter. There is zero connection between biblical Phillistines and Palestinians. Palestine was a region on a map and a variety of armies swept through there.4 The PLO Charter defines
the Palestinians as Arabs in numerous sections. I will cite only one section Article 13 Arab Unity and the liberation of Palestine are complimentary objectives; each leads to the achievement of the other. Arab unity will lead to the liberation of
Palestine and the liberation of Palestine will lead to Arab unity....To work for one
is to work for both. Article 15 Refers the Zionist occupation of the greater Arab homeland. Amazingly, after reading the PLO charter some still talk of a Palestinian
ethnicity . The Palestinians do not even call themselves in their own charter.
One can view the full report at http://www.secularislam.org/jihad/subjects.htm
The enumeration of the himmi laws are from The Great Divide Alvin Schmidtt Page 59-60.
The Dhimmi laws were commonly believed to apply only to Jews and Christians but were
extended to Zoroastrians. No doubt a well informed reader might point out other people as well. If Jim Crow was evil than Dhimmi laws were more evil as they lasted
many times longer. One can go to Freedom House and look at the treatment of religious
minorities in Islamic lands. Yet we hear zero about genuine abuse of real indigenous
people and those who just want to be left alone.
The 20 Dhimmi laws
1 Dhimmis may not have Muslims as servants.
2 Build or repair a place of worship.
3 Dress like Muslims
4 Give their children Muslim names
5 Wear signet rings on their fingers
6 Ride on horses with saddles. ( Those on the left are more concerned with animal welfare than with minorities under Islam )
7 Deter someone from becoming a Muslim
8 Possess firearms ( this makes for easier beatings and extortion)
9 Mourn their dead publicly
10 Prevent Muslim travelers from staying in their home.
( A similar concept was a minor cause of the American Revolution)
11 Defend themselves when attacked by a Muslim . The penalty for this is amputation
of hand or hands or death.( This makes extortion easy )
12 Give evidence in a court of law. ( How convenient for extortion)
13 Marry Muslim women. Though Muslim men may marry Dhimmi women.
14 Drink or sell liquor openly
15 Build houses in Muslim neighborhoods.
(The left likes to talk of aparthied and is silent on this)
16 Bury their dead near Muslim cemetaries
17 Have their cemetaries look like Muslim Ceremonies
18 Display or wear a Christian crosss
19 Read or pray aloud in Churches or their own homes.
20 Adress a muslim unless adressed first.
21 Convert a Muslim to another faith .
The penalty for number 21 is death.
I find this amazing when a leftist flipantly compares Shariah with Christian conservatives. This comparision bears no relationship to reality. A simple look at the agenda of the religious right makes a comparison absurd. However there is more
to follow.
Islam inflicted a series of discriminitory taxes on Dhimmis
Kharaj was a real estate tax applied to Dhimmis. They were no longer the owners of their property but tenants. This was used to coerce conversions and harass people into leaving.
Jizya was a poll tax that was applied to Dhimmis. It had to be paid in a humiliating manner at a public ceremony.
The other taxes such as travel tax were higher on Dhimmis. In times of hardship Muslim leaders raised the taxes and jailed and tortured church leaders until a ransom was paid. In 832 the Copts of Egypt revolted against this system of taxation.
The revolt was brutaly surpressed and there were massacres , deportations and large scale property destruction. The Egyptian Copts are still suffering today. Where is there homeland ? The deafening silence on the left is noteworthy. The Copts have been occupied for 1200 years.
that Muslims have been where they are currently. Authors Fred P Isaac and Alvin Schmidtt describe the conquest and subjugation of ethnicities.
Therefore when a person makes a claim that the "Palestinians deserve a state he is litteraly endorsing 1300 years of colonialism against an indigenous population . The
blatant hypocrisy is that real indigenous people are being deprived of nation status.
Assyrians and Egyptian Coptics like Jews have their own language, religion and historical identity dating back 4000 years. The Kurds have their own language and historical identity dating back 3000 years.
The short version that the Palestinians are generic Arabs are based on 4 points. 1
Palestinians speak Arabic the same as Arabs elsewhere. 2 Palestinian largely worship
Sunni Islam the same as Saudis,most of Syria, Jordan and the Sunni triangle. 3 Cultural Identity 1964 founded in Egypt by Nasser with a Marxist Charter. There is zero connection between biblical Phillistines and Palestinians. Palestine was a region on a map and a variety of armies swept through there.4 The PLO Charter defines
the Palestinians as Arabs in numerous sections. I will cite only one section Article 13 Arab Unity and the liberation of Palestine are complimentary objectives; each leads to the achievement of the other. Arab unity will lead to the liberation of
Palestine and the liberation of Palestine will lead to Arab unity....To work for one
is to work for both. Article 15 Refers the Zionist occupation of the greater Arab homeland. Amazingly, after reading the PLO charter some still talk of a Palestinian
ethnicity . The Palestinians do not even call themselves in their own charter.
One can view the full report at http://www.secularislam.org/jihad/subjects.htm
The enumeration of the himmi laws are from The Great Divide Alvin Schmidtt Page 59-60.
The Dhimmi laws were commonly believed to apply only to Jews and Christians but were
extended to Zoroastrians. No doubt a well informed reader might point out other people as well. If Jim Crow was evil than Dhimmi laws were more evil as they lasted
many times longer. One can go to Freedom House and look at the treatment of religious
minorities in Islamic lands. Yet we hear zero about genuine abuse of real indigenous
people and those who just want to be left alone.
The 20 Dhimmi laws
1 Dhimmis may not have Muslims as servants.
2 Build or repair a place of worship.
3 Dress like Muslims
4 Give their children Muslim names
5 Wear signet rings on their fingers
6 Ride on horses with saddles. ( Those on the left are more concerned with animal welfare than with minorities under Islam )
7 Deter someone from becoming a Muslim
8 Possess firearms ( this makes for easier beatings and extortion)
9 Mourn their dead publicly
10 Prevent Muslim travelers from staying in their home.
( A similar concept was a minor cause of the American Revolution)
11 Defend themselves when attacked by a Muslim . The penalty for this is amputation
of hand or hands or death.( This makes extortion easy )
12 Give evidence in a court of law. ( How convenient for extortion)
13 Marry Muslim women. Though Muslim men may marry Dhimmi women.
14 Drink or sell liquor openly
15 Build houses in Muslim neighborhoods.
(The left likes to talk of aparthied and is silent on this)
16 Bury their dead near Muslim cemetaries
17 Have their cemetaries look like Muslim Ceremonies
18 Display or wear a Christian crosss
19 Read or pray aloud in Churches or their own homes.
20 Adress a muslim unless adressed first.
21 Convert a Muslim to another faith .
The penalty for number 21 is death.
I find this amazing when a leftist flipantly compares Shariah with Christian conservatives. This comparision bears no relationship to reality. A simple look at the agenda of the religious right makes a comparison absurd. However there is more
to follow.
Islam inflicted a series of discriminitory taxes on Dhimmis
Kharaj was a real estate tax applied to Dhimmis. They were no longer the owners of their property but tenants. This was used to coerce conversions and harass people into leaving.
Jizya was a poll tax that was applied to Dhimmis. It had to be paid in a humiliating manner at a public ceremony.
The other taxes such as travel tax were higher on Dhimmis. In times of hardship Muslim leaders raised the taxes and jailed and tortured church leaders until a ransom was paid. In 832 the Copts of Egypt revolted against this system of taxation.
The revolt was brutaly surpressed and there were massacres , deportations and large scale property destruction. The Egyptian Copts are still suffering today. Where is there homeland ? The deafening silence on the left is noteworthy. The Copts have been occupied for 1200 years.
Friday, April 01, 2005
Revenge of the "wingnuts" take 2
I do want to thank the Recidivist on this part. The mania about the religious right is absurd. I have never understood it and still don't understand the obsession. Yet he posted a link. As a non Christian minority I do not feel threatened by the religious right. I have sat in all kinds of chuches and never once felt uncomfortable
or un welcome.
He posted a blurb and I will go line by line. It is from conservativepetitions.com
1 Protest a rouge judges pornography ruling. Most conservatives do not have a problem with pornography so long as Children are not the participants or viewers.In the age of the internet access is too easy. I am not a fan of censorship but keeping
minors away from porn is a good idea.
Score 1 for the Wingnuts
2The teaching of the Declaration's religious roots.
What is wrong with that? However I am open to a persuasive argument on that one.
Score 2 for the Wingnuts
3 Demand that Jeb Bush spare Terri Schiavos life
Score 3 For the Wingnuts . My dissent is based on the outmoded notion that a spouse is the sole arbiter of these choices. We do not live in the world of Ozzie & Harriet.
The presumption that a spouse will act in the best intrests is outmoded. I would say the same if the roles were reversed. A biological family should have some say in this matter.
4 Cry out for the ejection of homosexual videos for health reasons
Score one for the left. Presuming minors are not involved this seems absurd. The context is the question sex ed for older teens . Public saftey trumps puritanism , but I would hope that the videos are done tasteful manner.
5That Homosexuals can change if they want to.
Score two for the left. Who cares if somebody is gay ? The notion of a biology or choice is irrelevant. Who cares as long as consenting adults are involved ?
6 Boycott Abercrombie & Fitch. I am not a fan of boycotts but the left has its own such as those caried out against Celestial Seasonings & Rush Limbaugh advertisers. If you don't like the image don't buy the product. I am not a fan of Sean Penn so I do not see his films this is my right. Boycotting advertisers is far worse than boycotting the actual perpetrators Sean Penn, Michael Moore etc.
Score three for the left.
7 Demand that Christian and Jews be defended against Islamic indoctrination.
This is two parts as several schools have Islamic sensitivity training that crosses the line of tollerance. There are schools that have students pretend they are muslim for a day. We do not do this for any other relgion.
The persecution of religious minorities in Islamic Socities is a serious issue. The Recidivist does not adress this topic at all. When I tried to discuss it he called me a bigot. This must make Freedom House bigoted as well. Nor is the problem limited to Jews and Christians as Buddhists,Hindus,Zoroastrians,Sikh,Yezidis and animists have similar problems. That list is not comprehensive and I may have missed a few.
Score this for the Wingnuts
Score Left 3 Wingnuts 4
8 Opposose the mnadate that allows Homosexual Mentors
Everyone should have a mentor and mentor others. Gays should not be included
Score this one for the left
Tie Ball game.
9 Oppose UN radical Homosexual agenda.
There are plenty of reasons to oppose the UN but this is not one of them.
Score
Left 5 wingnuts 4
10 Brand Michael Moore a traitor.
I really wish we could but as I did not see the film I would have to abstain. Being a fan of free speech I have to give this to the left. I can be persuaded here as well
but the score is
Left 6 Wingnuts 4
I posted the following
These are not mainstream GOP views . It is like claiming Michael Moore or Noam Chomsky speak for the Democratic Party.
You are taking the most strident voices and tring to pass it as mainstream. Although I am tempted by the Michael Moore traitor bit.
In a way you are guilty of doing the same thing you accuse Horrowitz of . The irony may be lost on you as humor does not seem to be your strong suit. Let it sink in and you might enjoy a laugh later.
Thanks for the responseand believe it or not I appreciate it.
The Recidivist was a good sport for the most part. He takes this way too seriously at times . If he would knock off the invectives this would make great reading. A good disagreement makes for a lively board.
Here is his response in fairness. The petition was not his but a response to my query
with regard to his 9-11 Sharia quip.
On the issue of the website,when you say that I am taking the most strident voices and trying to pass it as mainstream....would you perhaps care to show me where I have spoken about anything other than the people on the website ? Where have I used anything other than their own words and where have I tried to pass them off as anything other than simply scary ?
Yes go back and check , and you dearest one, and you will find that I haven't tried
to pass them off as mainstream at all ... I haven't even tried to compare them to you.
(This is my comentary." The original post was a ham handed satire. If I were in the Recivists Shoes I readily admit where this would be scary. Some of those issues are more complex "ConservativePettions.com harnesses Internet technology to help conservative Americans,like you(not me YOU)let those in charge know how you think."
If the Recidivist claims this is satire there is some basis for his claims. Not all those issues are black and white. I will give him credit on this one as it was an over reaction on my part to the Sharia quip. For this I appologize but the 9-11 sharia bit was over the top.)
Where have I held Michael Moore up as paragons of virtue and speakers of great truth?I view both of them as circus acts who speak occaisional truths,but who are generally best ignored and viewed as poor entertainment. In Michael Moore's case I consider him amoral.
(My reference was to Moore as extreemists not as reflective of the Recidivist. If there was confusion I regret it . I am glad we agree on something and yes a broken clock is correct twice a day. Chomsky is being taught on college campuses and that is a major point of Horrowitz's contention nor is Chomsky alone.)
As for me being guilty of what I accuse Horowitz of..at least I accuse on the basis of what he has said or put in writing....you just accuse on the basis of what you WANT me to have said-because in addopting your manner of misrepresentation, you are guilty of the same as David Horowitz (not only as well)
As for my sense of humor - given the fragility of your other claims today (and as ever) you will I am sure understand if I chose to take your comment with a pinch of salt that it deserves.
Now next time don't try so hard and you may find that you do not end up looking like a clown.
Unlike the Recidivist I will conceede a point. If I were a gay man these people would concern me. As a site that caters to a gay readership those people are ripe for lampooning. I may have over reacted on the heels of "All aboard , this is the 9:11 to Sharia Law ". Remember I am a WTC93 survivor and an eyewitness to 9-11. That remark was certainly uncalled for and unwise. I will apologize for my post here as a gentleman but the Recidivist should also withdraw the above post as sophomoric poetic license.
The annalysis of these issues listed show that some have merrit if looked at more closely. Most of those issues should be examined in greater depth. Everyone is entitled to dignity and respect but there are larger issues. Your right to respect should not mean denigration of others . That last point was not adressed to the Recidivist but a general rule.
The comments about organized religion in the comments section deserve a full post.We
would have to explore history , the nature of man, Sociology and a range of other
areas. I do note that the Recidivist was polite and respectful to the man not his position. It appears that sometimes he forgets that others do not share his opinion.
The Pope is an inpiratiration to millions and not all of them Catholic. I do not share his views on the Pope or organized religion as I am a fan of both.
or un welcome.
He posted a blurb and I will go line by line. It is from conservativepetitions.com
1 Protest a rouge judges pornography ruling. Most conservatives do not have a problem with pornography so long as Children are not the participants or viewers.In the age of the internet access is too easy. I am not a fan of censorship but keeping
minors away from porn is a good idea.
Score 1 for the Wingnuts
2The teaching of the Declaration's religious roots.
What is wrong with that? However I am open to a persuasive argument on that one.
Score 2 for the Wingnuts
3 Demand that Jeb Bush spare Terri Schiavos life
Score 3 For the Wingnuts . My dissent is based on the outmoded notion that a spouse is the sole arbiter of these choices. We do not live in the world of Ozzie & Harriet.
The presumption that a spouse will act in the best intrests is outmoded. I would say the same if the roles were reversed. A biological family should have some say in this matter.
4 Cry out for the ejection of homosexual videos for health reasons
Score one for the left. Presuming minors are not involved this seems absurd. The context is the question sex ed for older teens . Public saftey trumps puritanism , but I would hope that the videos are done tasteful manner.
5That Homosexuals can change if they want to.
Score two for the left. Who cares if somebody is gay ? The notion of a biology or choice is irrelevant. Who cares as long as consenting adults are involved ?
6 Boycott Abercrombie & Fitch. I am not a fan of boycotts but the left has its own such as those caried out against Celestial Seasonings & Rush Limbaugh advertisers. If you don't like the image don't buy the product. I am not a fan of Sean Penn so I do not see his films this is my right. Boycotting advertisers is far worse than boycotting the actual perpetrators Sean Penn, Michael Moore etc.
Score three for the left.
7 Demand that Christian and Jews be defended against Islamic indoctrination.
This is two parts as several schools have Islamic sensitivity training that crosses the line of tollerance. There are schools that have students pretend they are muslim for a day. We do not do this for any other relgion.
The persecution of religious minorities in Islamic Socities is a serious issue. The Recidivist does not adress this topic at all. When I tried to discuss it he called me a bigot. This must make Freedom House bigoted as well. Nor is the problem limited to Jews and Christians as Buddhists,Hindus,Zoroastrians,Sikh,Yezidis and animists have similar problems. That list is not comprehensive and I may have missed a few.
Score this for the Wingnuts
Score Left 3 Wingnuts 4
8 Opposose the mnadate that allows Homosexual Mentors
Everyone should have a mentor and mentor others. Gays should not be included
Score this one for the left
Tie Ball game.
9 Oppose UN radical Homosexual agenda.
There are plenty of reasons to oppose the UN but this is not one of them.
Score
Left 5 wingnuts 4
10 Brand Michael Moore a traitor.
I really wish we could but as I did not see the film I would have to abstain. Being a fan of free speech I have to give this to the left. I can be persuaded here as well
but the score is
Left 6 Wingnuts 4
I posted the following
These are not mainstream GOP views . It is like claiming Michael Moore or Noam Chomsky speak for the Democratic Party.
You are taking the most strident voices and tring to pass it as mainstream. Although I am tempted by the Michael Moore traitor bit.
In a way you are guilty of doing the same thing you accuse Horrowitz of . The irony may be lost on you as humor does not seem to be your strong suit. Let it sink in and you might enjoy a laugh later.
Thanks for the responseand believe it or not I appreciate it.
The Recidivist was a good sport for the most part. He takes this way too seriously at times . If he would knock off the invectives this would make great reading. A good disagreement makes for a lively board.
Here is his response in fairness. The petition was not his but a response to my query
with regard to his 9-11 Sharia quip.
On the issue of the website,when you say that I am taking the most strident voices and trying to pass it as mainstream....would you perhaps care to show me where I have spoken about anything other than the people on the website ? Where have I used anything other than their own words and where have I tried to pass them off as anything other than simply scary ?
Yes go back and check , and you dearest one, and you will find that I haven't tried
to pass them off as mainstream at all ... I haven't even tried to compare them to you.
(This is my comentary." The original post was a ham handed satire. If I were in the Recivists Shoes I readily admit where this would be scary. Some of those issues are more complex "ConservativePettions.com harnesses Internet technology to help conservative Americans,like you(not me YOU)let those in charge know how you think."
If the Recidivist claims this is satire there is some basis for his claims. Not all those issues are black and white. I will give him credit on this one as it was an over reaction on my part to the Sharia quip. For this I appologize but the 9-11 sharia bit was over the top.)
Where have I held Michael Moore up as paragons of virtue and speakers of great truth?I view both of them as circus acts who speak occaisional truths,but who are generally best ignored and viewed as poor entertainment. In Michael Moore's case I consider him amoral.
(My reference was to Moore as extreemists not as reflective of the Recidivist. If there was confusion I regret it . I am glad we agree on something and yes a broken clock is correct twice a day. Chomsky is being taught on college campuses and that is a major point of Horrowitz's contention nor is Chomsky alone.)
As for me being guilty of what I accuse Horowitz of..at least I accuse on the basis of what he has said or put in writing....you just accuse on the basis of what you WANT me to have said-because in addopting your manner of misrepresentation, you are guilty of the same as David Horowitz (not only as well)
As for my sense of humor - given the fragility of your other claims today (and as ever) you will I am sure understand if I chose to take your comment with a pinch of salt that it deserves.
Now next time don't try so hard and you may find that you do not end up looking like a clown.
Unlike the Recidivist I will conceede a point. If I were a gay man these people would concern me. As a site that caters to a gay readership those people are ripe for lampooning. I may have over reacted on the heels of "All aboard , this is the 9:11 to Sharia Law ". Remember I am a WTC93 survivor and an eyewitness to 9-11. That remark was certainly uncalled for and unwise. I will apologize for my post here as a gentleman but the Recidivist should also withdraw the above post as sophomoric poetic license.
The annalysis of these issues listed show that some have merrit if looked at more closely. Most of those issues should be examined in greater depth. Everyone is entitled to dignity and respect but there are larger issues. Your right to respect should not mean denigration of others . That last point was not adressed to the Recidivist but a general rule.
The comments about organized religion in the comments section deserve a full post.We
would have to explore history , the nature of man, Sociology and a range of other
areas. I do note that the Recidivist was polite and respectful to the man not his position. It appears that sometimes he forgets that others do not share his opinion.
The Pope is an inpiratiration to millions and not all of them Catholic. I do not share his views on the Pope or organized religion as I am a fan of both.
Thursday, March 31, 2005
Revenge of the "wingnuts"
One of the things that people fail to notice is I enjoy posting and debate. If everyone sat around we would be like bobble head dolls. Post like that are lifeless
and dull. People who read this blog regularly know I respect honest liberals who are civilin dissent like Kafka and the Chemist. I do not hate the sneering left as typified by the Recidivist . He is entertaining but I stand by my earlier assertions. However he has a problem with dissent of any type. The truth is he is not as open minded as he thinks and should lighten up. I do tip my hat to him for being a sport yesterday. I salute the Chemist for providing an excellent blog every day.
The new term from the left to disparage us on right is wingnut. The term doesn't bother me one bit and I have grown fond of it.Wingnuts are fasteners and keep the screws in place.
1 I visit the Recidivist and I spot a Post Get Drunk Vote Liberal. " So Has Get Drunk Vote Liberal ...He thinks it could be fun to run the Gay adgenda down America's throat".
I pointed out thereis a wide variety of thought on the gay issue and the GOP. I listed the three major battle groud issues involving gays.
1 Most Americans favor civil unions. The issue was not presented that way
2Don't ask don't tell is the policy of the service. Gays can serve and the government is not allowed to ask or inquire on the matter.
3 In school districts the issue of orientation is being presented in early education.The critique is that the material is being presented way too early.
A poster named Hawke
"Y'see this sounds all nice and homo friendly but if the government ( you know, those people in power, not the general public) don't publicize thisview then it isn't the widely held views of American Republicans.
The US Government are anti gay in every way,shape and form.If there was any samples of this not being the case gays wouldn't feel so persecuted there right now.
Civil Unions? Quashed
Gays in the Military ? Not on my watch Pardner
Sex ED in schools? How about any Education in schools"
A pause on this for the reader who may be new. I did a post on Gay Rights Israel and Muslim nations combined. Mr Hawke who is respectful should look at that post before he talks of persecuted gays. The fact that Israel grants assylum to Gays fleeing the PA for their lives is meaningless to the Recidivist.Compare the US, Israel and most of the Muslim world on gays. Then tell me about where gays should feel persecuted.
The Recidivist "This is what happens when you have a semi-illiterate President who comes under the influence of religious fundamentalist Fuitcakes . ( Obvious gay pun
left alone )... All Abord ,this is the 9:11 to Sharia Law:)"
I reiterated my earlier points and added Your remarks about the Presidents intelligence are typical. Bush has an Ivy MBA and was found by the military to have a higher IQ than Kerry.
Republican's are made of several wings Rudy types are liberal on this issue.Libertarians also tend towards liberalism on social issues. The stereo type of the Bible Tumpers is Simplistic.
To Be CTD
and dull. People who read this blog regularly know I respect honest liberals who are civilin dissent like Kafka and the Chemist. I do not hate the sneering left as typified by the Recidivist . He is entertaining but I stand by my earlier assertions. However he has a problem with dissent of any type. The truth is he is not as open minded as he thinks and should lighten up. I do tip my hat to him for being a sport yesterday. I salute the Chemist for providing an excellent blog every day.
The new term from the left to disparage us on right is wingnut. The term doesn't bother me one bit and I have grown fond of it.Wingnuts are fasteners and keep the screws in place.
1 I visit the Recidivist and I spot a Post Get Drunk Vote Liberal. " So Has Get Drunk Vote Liberal ...He thinks it could be fun to run the Gay adgenda down America's throat".
I pointed out thereis a wide variety of thought on the gay issue and the GOP. I listed the three major battle groud issues involving gays.
1 Most Americans favor civil unions. The issue was not presented that way
2Don't ask don't tell is the policy of the service. Gays can serve and the government is not allowed to ask or inquire on the matter.
3 In school districts the issue of orientation is being presented in early education.The critique is that the material is being presented way too early.
A poster named Hawke
"Y'see this sounds all nice and homo friendly but if the government ( you know, those people in power, not the general public) don't publicize thisview then it isn't the widely held views of American Republicans.
The US Government are anti gay in every way,shape and form.If there was any samples of this not being the case gays wouldn't feel so persecuted there right now.
Civil Unions? Quashed
Gays in the Military ? Not on my watch Pardner
Sex ED in schools? How about any Education in schools"
A pause on this for the reader who may be new. I did a post on Gay Rights Israel and Muslim nations combined. Mr Hawke who is respectful should look at that post before he talks of persecuted gays. The fact that Israel grants assylum to Gays fleeing the PA for their lives is meaningless to the Recidivist.Compare the US, Israel and most of the Muslim world on gays. Then tell me about where gays should feel persecuted.
The Recidivist "This is what happens when you have a semi-illiterate President who comes under the influence of religious fundamentalist Fuitcakes . ( Obvious gay pun
left alone )... All Abord ,this is the 9:11 to Sharia Law:)"
I reiterated my earlier points and added Your remarks about the Presidents intelligence are typical. Bush has an Ivy MBA and was found by the military to have a higher IQ than Kerry.
Republican's are made of several wings Rudy types are liberal on this issue.Libertarians also tend towards liberalism on social issues. The stereo type of the Bible Tumpers is Simplistic.
To Be CTD
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
The Ultimate Troll - Socrates on Trial
There is an evil person who posts on Front Page Forum who uses 30 known handles. He is the worst known troll and human being I have encountered. I do not say this lightly as I worked in a facility that hired people in half way house residents. I supervised hardened criminals who were ordinary reasonable people and often hard working.
What makes this troll unique is he fancies himself a writer . His usual title is Socrates but he posts under thirty names with identical writing styles. He targets
women in general and several notably. Commenting on a woman's intimate body parts is not good form. He uses the crudest and most vile descriptions to describe Donal who post here. He is also has a vendatta against Morgaan who reads this blog.
What makes him annoying is that he posts to himself . Then he uses the same style and claims independent identities. If misogyny is not a great enough crime he tells
Jews "Get in the Oven", has made a series of racist remarks aimed at blacks, latins,muslims. He has running skits with Chinese charachters that use gramatically
perfect Chenglish with no pronouns. The typing style is identical to his other personas. He will then have a persona scream bigotry at posters that do not post on race.He also steals identities and posts profanity under other peoples identities. He also uses old handles and claims to be back but the styles are identical to Socs.
Soc fancies himself a talented writer but his posts are devoid of substance and creativity. He mistakes spelling and sentence structure for intelligence and content.
David Horowitz, Yeagley and Richard Poe have visited this blog and not flayed me. Stephen Schwartz's assistance sent me a correction and I will repeat it. Stephen Schwartz does not bash Western Culture as he is a brilliant man. Soc asked Horowitz for a job as a staff writer and he was turned down. Horowitz knows talent and charachter when he sees it and Soc fails on both accounts. Richard Poe allayed my fears of being banned as I am a Rudy Republican. Poe explained that is easy to tell the difference between an honest person and a knave. Soc is worse than a knave he is a parasite and a predator.
Soc is lucky I am not Horowitz because if I was he might be looking at jail time. Soc confessed that he was rejected by Horowitz this Sunday on the Kaplan thread. The key with a criminal is to let them talk and they dig their own gaves. The problem is
that egomaniacs are never as smart as they think. Soc also demonstrated the stealing identity routine and demonstated it on a Gladzov thread. Soc has been trying to damage Horowitz financially. He has hurt FPM by turning the forum into the temple of Soc. He has his alleged cult of admirers who post on nothing other than Soc or target his foes.
I will not adress the more serious charges against Soc. There is about a one in fifty chance he did not commit the heinous crime . I did read the confession in the archives of FPM. However he is a sick and deranged person and may have said it for attention. The circumstantial evidence is that he teaches in a prison not a school.
The security check to work with children is tougher than to work in a prison.
Attention is like a drug to him and he plays this Sophomoric game of his clones worhiping him. He has an alias Muster Quark who has never posted on a topic only Soc boosting and attacking his enemies. The other crime is serious he is a bore with no imagination and creativity. He is the stupidest poster on the board as one has to repeat the same point dozens of times. The lack of creativity and intelligence is profound especially considering he aspires to godhood.
Now is the time to testify let FPM know our stories are here. An ordinary pest like Uptown or Ducky can stay. They post under one or name and are just comedic relef. I would not even complain about an ordinary troll. This is above and beyond tolleration
it is time to prosecute Soc.
I want to thank Richard Poe for opening my eyes. It is shameful what a fine place has devolved into. Responsible dissent is fine but self promotion needless abuse, harassment and being an uncreative boor is too much. We must aspire to greatness rather than sink to the lowest common denominator.
Fight Back and lets look ahead this is the first step.
The Beak
What makes this troll unique is he fancies himself a writer . His usual title is Socrates but he posts under thirty names with identical writing styles. He targets
women in general and several notably. Commenting on a woman's intimate body parts is not good form. He uses the crudest and most vile descriptions to describe Donal who post here. He is also has a vendatta against Morgaan who reads this blog.
What makes him annoying is that he posts to himself . Then he uses the same style and claims independent identities. If misogyny is not a great enough crime he tells
Jews "Get in the Oven", has made a series of racist remarks aimed at blacks, latins,muslims. He has running skits with Chinese charachters that use gramatically
perfect Chenglish with no pronouns. The typing style is identical to his other personas. He will then have a persona scream bigotry at posters that do not post on race.He also steals identities and posts profanity under other peoples identities. He also uses old handles and claims to be back but the styles are identical to Socs.
Soc fancies himself a talented writer but his posts are devoid of substance and creativity. He mistakes spelling and sentence structure for intelligence and content.
David Horowitz, Yeagley and Richard Poe have visited this blog and not flayed me. Stephen Schwartz's assistance sent me a correction and I will repeat it. Stephen Schwartz does not bash Western Culture as he is a brilliant man. Soc asked Horowitz for a job as a staff writer and he was turned down. Horowitz knows talent and charachter when he sees it and Soc fails on both accounts. Richard Poe allayed my fears of being banned as I am a Rudy Republican. Poe explained that is easy to tell the difference between an honest person and a knave. Soc is worse than a knave he is a parasite and a predator.
Soc is lucky I am not Horowitz because if I was he might be looking at jail time. Soc confessed that he was rejected by Horowitz this Sunday on the Kaplan thread. The key with a criminal is to let them talk and they dig their own gaves. The problem is
that egomaniacs are never as smart as they think. Soc also demonstrated the stealing identity routine and demonstated it on a Gladzov thread. Soc has been trying to damage Horowitz financially. He has hurt FPM by turning the forum into the temple of Soc. He has his alleged cult of admirers who post on nothing other than Soc or target his foes.
I will not adress the more serious charges against Soc. There is about a one in fifty chance he did not commit the heinous crime . I did read the confession in the archives of FPM. However he is a sick and deranged person and may have said it for attention. The circumstantial evidence is that he teaches in a prison not a school.
The security check to work with children is tougher than to work in a prison.
Attention is like a drug to him and he plays this Sophomoric game of his clones worhiping him. He has an alias Muster Quark who has never posted on a topic only Soc boosting and attacking his enemies. The other crime is serious he is a bore with no imagination and creativity. He is the stupidest poster on the board as one has to repeat the same point dozens of times. The lack of creativity and intelligence is profound especially considering he aspires to godhood.
Now is the time to testify let FPM know our stories are here. An ordinary pest like Uptown or Ducky can stay. They post under one or name and are just comedic relef. I would not even complain about an ordinary troll. This is above and beyond tolleration
it is time to prosecute Soc.
I want to thank Richard Poe for opening my eyes. It is shameful what a fine place has devolved into. Responsible dissent is fine but self promotion needless abuse, harassment and being an uncreative boor is too much. We must aspire to greatness rather than sink to the lowest common denominator.
Fight Back and lets look ahead this is the first step.
The Beak
Tuesday, March 29, 2005
The Electronic Bar Part 3
There is something about a small enterprise that is intimate. Larger concerns loose the personal touch due to size. This blog which was originally was devoted to comedy has strayed from its mission. Some critics would argue my posts are still comedy.
Unexpected the previous instalment of this blog was picked up by Moonbat Central's
Richard Poe. His points are well stated and valid in his case. Moonbat Central is a professional site with a comunity oriented approach and standards. As a smaller blog I aspire to something entirely unique. I celebrate the first amendement here every day. I welcome all points of view but we tend to lean to the right. Civil dissent is respected. I even permit personal attacks but I wish they would be creative. Mr Poe
pointed out that if this blog were larger I would face tough choices and he may be correct. My first allegiance is to the first amendment that is the policy of this blog.
Mr Poe asked what would I do if neo nazis targeted this site. Mr Poe is an excellent
writer and brilliant man. He has limitations that I do not have here. As a serious
intellectual he may not be inclined to use such comments as comedic foils. This blog was intended as an outlet for my comedic aspirations. I demonstrated that approach in another forum. The white nationalist did not enjoy being lampooned. The worst thing one can do to a crank is be honest and candid. Therefore the first poster who posts crank classics like Larry Silverstein blew up the Twin towers will be labeled a crank.
Another crtiticism is I do not provide an email link. This was a choice I made early
in the set up of this blog. This forces my critics to post their complaints in public. You want to take a shot at me fine do it in the comment section for all to see. I live in NYC and have been threatened by leftists and Islamic Nationalists . I do not fear these types in person but the safety is a reasonable precaution. One crazed lunatic was enraged to near violence because I called my self a nationalist.
Yes I love my country and I am not ashamed to admit it. If you have a problem with that god bless you. I do not care what they think in some Salon in Paris. I do care what people think in Indiana,Newark etc.
Our commitment to the first amendment has never changed. Forums like Moonbat Central,
Bad Eagle and Free Republic have missions . They cater to a large but select audience
and wish to keep their message . As a large enterprise they run the risk of being swarmed with unrully types. My motto here is bring it on ,being small allows me to dedicate individual attention.Sometimess less is more and I count my blessings.
Unexpected the previous instalment of this blog was picked up by Moonbat Central's
Richard Poe. His points are well stated and valid in his case. Moonbat Central is a professional site with a comunity oriented approach and standards. As a smaller blog I aspire to something entirely unique. I celebrate the first amendement here every day. I welcome all points of view but we tend to lean to the right. Civil dissent is respected. I even permit personal attacks but I wish they would be creative. Mr Poe
pointed out that if this blog were larger I would face tough choices and he may be correct. My first allegiance is to the first amendment that is the policy of this blog.
Mr Poe asked what would I do if neo nazis targeted this site. Mr Poe is an excellent
writer and brilliant man. He has limitations that I do not have here. As a serious
intellectual he may not be inclined to use such comments as comedic foils. This blog was intended as an outlet for my comedic aspirations. I demonstrated that approach in another forum. The white nationalist did not enjoy being lampooned. The worst thing one can do to a crank is be honest and candid. Therefore the first poster who posts crank classics like Larry Silverstein blew up the Twin towers will be labeled a crank.
Another crtiticism is I do not provide an email link. This was a choice I made early
in the set up of this blog. This forces my critics to post their complaints in public. You want to take a shot at me fine do it in the comment section for all to see. I live in NYC and have been threatened by leftists and Islamic Nationalists . I do not fear these types in person but the safety is a reasonable precaution. One crazed lunatic was enraged to near violence because I called my self a nationalist.
Yes I love my country and I am not ashamed to admit it. If you have a problem with that god bless you. I do not care what they think in some Salon in Paris. I do care what people think in Indiana,Newark etc.
Our commitment to the first amendment has never changed. Forums like Moonbat Central,
Bad Eagle and Free Republic have missions . They cater to a large but select audience
and wish to keep their message . As a large enterprise they run the risk of being swarmed with unrully types. My motto here is bring it on ,being small allows me to dedicate individual attention.Sometimess less is more and I count my blessings.
Monday, March 28, 2005
My take on the Left and culture of insanity
I am one of those rare birds a proabortion Republican. I do not like the procedure and wished we lived in a world witout it. Yet I am a realist and know that mistakes do happen. I would like to keep the law as is. My view is that partial birth abortion
is infanticide and should stop. There should also be parental notification. One needs
permission slips for every other procedure an it is hypocritical to place it in a special category.
I also favor the death penalty and wish it were used more frequently. Society has predators who need to be removed. It should also be used to eliminate criminals who misbehave in jail. Terrorists should get it automaticaly and in an ideal world swiftly.
That being established there is insanity on the left with the Schiavo case. If she had a murder spree they would be up in arms protesting. I do not like men in black robes deciding whose life is valuable. The arbitrary whims of her husband should carry no greater weight than that of her Kin. This choice should be arived at in family consensus.Any Yahoo that would try to pull the plug on my gradmother who had Alzhiemers would have body parts broken. She lived and we loved every last moment of time with her.The fact that she couldn't recognize me didn't chang my love one iota.
This was grandma for better or worse and that is what families are about. Maybe you
want to live in a society that puts seniors out in the cold to die but leave me out of that vision.
That being said if it were me I would want the plug pulled. However it is not me and her family thinks otherwise. I respect the wishes of her sibling and parents. A spouse should not have sole power . Spouses come and they go but families remain .
What about their rights ? I would feel the same way if the sides were reversed. Kin should have a say in this matter.
You can rail about theocracy and the party of God. I ask you what exactly do you fear about the religious right ? Given the choice between Falwell and Robertson vs Michael Moore and Chomsky I choose Falwell. I know that Falwell is a loyal patriot
whom I disagree with quite often. Those terms do not describe Moore or Chomsky in any definition.
is infanticide and should stop. There should also be parental notification. One needs
permission slips for every other procedure an it is hypocritical to place it in a special category.
I also favor the death penalty and wish it were used more frequently. Society has predators who need to be removed. It should also be used to eliminate criminals who misbehave in jail. Terrorists should get it automaticaly and in an ideal world swiftly.
That being established there is insanity on the left with the Schiavo case. If she had a murder spree they would be up in arms protesting. I do not like men in black robes deciding whose life is valuable. The arbitrary whims of her husband should carry no greater weight than that of her Kin. This choice should be arived at in family consensus.Any Yahoo that would try to pull the plug on my gradmother who had Alzhiemers would have body parts broken. She lived and we loved every last moment of time with her.The fact that she couldn't recognize me didn't chang my love one iota.
This was grandma for better or worse and that is what families are about. Maybe you
want to live in a society that puts seniors out in the cold to die but leave me out of that vision.
That being said if it were me I would want the plug pulled. However it is not me and her family thinks otherwise. I respect the wishes of her sibling and parents. A spouse should not have sole power . Spouses come and they go but families remain .
What about their rights ? I would feel the same way if the sides were reversed. Kin should have a say in this matter.
You can rail about theocracy and the party of God. I ask you what exactly do you fear about the religious right ? Given the choice between Falwell and Robertson vs Michael Moore and Chomsky I choose Falwell. I know that Falwell is a loyal patriot
whom I disagree with quite often. Those terms do not describe Moore or Chomsky in any definition.
Sunday, March 27, 2005
The Electronic Bar Part 2
The policy of this blog remains its dedication to the First Amendment. Yet there are
those I respect who at times dissent from this ideal. Dr David Yeagley removed a group of white supremacists from his site. Yet this is an aberation as his site is dedicated to Indian Patriotism. The White Hate element did not fit in with his overall goals for his forum. He wrestled with the choice and made the correct choice
for his forum. Yeagley has invited me to post there and I do in the Jewish section . I seldom post beyond those sections as it is a forum dedicated to Native Americans. I read those sections but rarely post in respect for the goal of the forum. Native Americans should decide their own affairs.
Richard Poe is also a writer who I also respect. Yet he is dealing with the same problem on Moonbat Central. There is a disruptive element on that forum . He is deciding how to deal with it . His choice was to ban the disruptive posters. I strongly dissent from that choice but it is his forum. However Raimondo and Lerner do not provide any forum at all. My dissent is a respectful disagreement with a writer I admire.
The policy of this blog remains unchganged. If you are a fan or agree than lets hear from you. If you disagree that is fine as well and speak up. We serve all customers
at The Beak Speaks Bar but lean to the right. We allow entirely personal attacks but wish they were more creative. Warren and myself are not allowed on the Recidivists site but he is welcomed here. He is an example that Horowitz is right about intollerance and mindless bigotry. His supporters have been on this site for three weeks calling me a liar and bigot. They have yet not found a single quote or fact out of order.
I salute all who are dedicated to open forum even those who disagree with me like the Chemist & Kafka who run excellent blogs.
those I respect who at times dissent from this ideal. Dr David Yeagley removed a group of white supremacists from his site. Yet this is an aberation as his site is dedicated to Indian Patriotism. The White Hate element did not fit in with his overall goals for his forum. He wrestled with the choice and made the correct choice
for his forum. Yeagley has invited me to post there and I do in the Jewish section . I seldom post beyond those sections as it is a forum dedicated to Native Americans. I read those sections but rarely post in respect for the goal of the forum. Native Americans should decide their own affairs.
Richard Poe is also a writer who I also respect. Yet he is dealing with the same problem on Moonbat Central. There is a disruptive element on that forum . He is deciding how to deal with it . His choice was to ban the disruptive posters. I strongly dissent from that choice but it is his forum. However Raimondo and Lerner do not provide any forum at all. My dissent is a respectful disagreement with a writer I admire.
The policy of this blog remains unchganged. If you are a fan or agree than lets hear from you. If you disagree that is fine as well and speak up. We serve all customers
at The Beak Speaks Bar but lean to the right. We allow entirely personal attacks but wish they were more creative. Warren and myself are not allowed on the Recidivists site but he is welcomed here. He is an example that Horowitz is right about intollerance and mindless bigotry. His supporters have been on this site for three weeks calling me a liar and bigot. They have yet not found a single quote or fact out of order.
I salute all who are dedicated to open forum even those who disagree with me like the Chemist & Kafka who run excellent blogs.
Saturday, March 26, 2005
Take your best shot at David Horowitz
This is a sad but true fact that there are some cowardly leftist. This does not include the Chemist of Kafka. Yet I notice there are some bogs that do not allow Email . Conveniently these are the blogs with the most strident attacks on David Horowitz. I implore all you brave critics sent your comments directly to him. If you are not brave enough put them here and I will forward this post.
Do you think I would miss an opportunity to tell Rabbi Michael Lerner , Noam Chomsky or Dennis Raimondo off ? No I would step to the plate and send my thoughts. The problem is they do not post their adress. Horowitz is a giant and you can post directly to him. He isn't hiding so step up and give it your best effort. Do not be shy and let go of your anger.
Let us talk about some of the claims about David Horowitz. He was a former Communist and wised up. This is better than the Gnome of MIT who is still calling himself an anarchist. The fact that he has wised up and departed from the totalitarian left is to his credit.How many of you level similar charges against David Brock. I live in NYC have met this mindless cult of doctrinaire insanity. Do you think Lynne Stewart exsists in a vacum ? There is no excuse for anticapitalism, anarchism , communism or any form of totalitarianism. These extreemists have no place in the debate and deserve scrutiny. Freedom of speech does not preclude my reaction and notation of those comments.This does not preclude their right to be heard. It is ironic that they are protected by rights they readily deny others. DTN is protected under the same First amendment right you enjoy. Raise your hand if you complained over Hillary's "vast right wing conpiracy ". If you did not complain about that then you are a hypocrite.
Horowitz has every right to excersize free speech . The left uses the same tactics with less validity . How manny posters came to this site and called me a zionist, liar and a bigot. They produced zero quotes or incorrect facts. They also presume that because Horowitz,Farah, Trifkovik ,Alvin Schmidtt and Stephen Scwartz produce facts they do no like they are Zionist. Are they practicing hypocrisy by presuming all dissent is tainted ?
The religious right is not seditious . Jerry Falwell nor Pat Robertson have urged the violent overthrow of the government. What changes do they want that the left is hyperventilating over. Roe vs Wade would merely turn the matter to the states. For the record I am in favor of the existing law . The other demands school prayer and no gay marriage. Gays made a mistake in not accepting civil unions. The majority of America prefers that option.
The left has a history of sedition and should be watched. The Venona cables proved conclusively the left betrayed America. Does this mean all dissent against the war is sedition. Horowitz nor I make this claim but there are some important distinctions.
1 The dissent should be based on the policy.If you think that this is not in America's best intrest this is okay.
2 You should not attack Capitalism , America's History or add conpiracy theories.
3 No signs that advocate violence against officers or defeaism.
4 Distance yourself from Totalitarian Extreemists like Answer or Code Pink
5 Stay on message protest the war and stay on message. Palestine , Animal Rights and housing belong in seperate forums.
In the internet era everyone comes under scrutiny including Horowitz. If you are not up to the challenge do not publish . Horowitz has a right to interpret what you say and to add his two cents. Have any of you protested the Neocon Cabal routine ? Raimondo and others have been pushing variations on that theme. If you failed to say yes and are complaining you are a hypocrite.
Another familiar theme is the cheap shot over the death of Betty Van Patter. If one spends the time and reads his account the point is clear. Horowitz was a true believer in the cult of the left . The Pathers were the revolutionary vangard of the left. Like most followers of cults he did not believe the press acounts. Anyone who has contact with the far left knows they live in a seperate reality. Horowitz detractors conceed that his friend was killed by the Black Panthers. If one reads Pearsons Shadow of the Panhther on realizes that they were a streetgang with good PR.They told the brain impaired White leftist what they wanted to here. Horowitz and the true believers did the rest of the heavy lifting. The death of Van Patter started his move away from the left. He began an objective look at the lies of the left. One can read them in his excellent Second Thoughts Book.
There are a whole range of Authors who made the same journey. One can read Julius Lesters Journey in Lovesong. Ronald Radosh doccuments his journey in Commies. Peter Collier and Stephen Schwartz made this same trip. Christopher Hitchens is making the
break currenty.The extreeme left is a dead end commited to nothing other than obstructionism. I love my country and most liberals do as well. The time has come for
the blame America first crowd to go. Chomsky, Moore,Lerner, and Benjamin should be pushed out the door.
Do not blame Horowitz for pointing out the disease. Purge the extreemists and move forward with the rest of us. America does not benefit from one party rule. Conservatives become Lazy without competition. We are in danger of becoming a one party Country. That is a recipie for corruption and stagnation for our country.
Do you think I would miss an opportunity to tell Rabbi Michael Lerner , Noam Chomsky or Dennis Raimondo off ? No I would step to the plate and send my thoughts. The problem is they do not post their adress. Horowitz is a giant and you can post directly to him. He isn't hiding so step up and give it your best effort. Do not be shy and let go of your anger.
Let us talk about some of the claims about David Horowitz. He was a former Communist and wised up. This is better than the Gnome of MIT who is still calling himself an anarchist. The fact that he has wised up and departed from the totalitarian left is to his credit.How many of you level similar charges against David Brock. I live in NYC have met this mindless cult of doctrinaire insanity. Do you think Lynne Stewart exsists in a vacum ? There is no excuse for anticapitalism, anarchism , communism or any form of totalitarianism. These extreemists have no place in the debate and deserve scrutiny. Freedom of speech does not preclude my reaction and notation of those comments.This does not preclude their right to be heard. It is ironic that they are protected by rights they readily deny others. DTN is protected under the same First amendment right you enjoy. Raise your hand if you complained over Hillary's "vast right wing conpiracy ". If you did not complain about that then you are a hypocrite.
Horowitz has every right to excersize free speech . The left uses the same tactics with less validity . How manny posters came to this site and called me a zionist, liar and a bigot. They produced zero quotes or incorrect facts. They also presume that because Horowitz,Farah, Trifkovik ,Alvin Schmidtt and Stephen Scwartz produce facts they do no like they are Zionist. Are they practicing hypocrisy by presuming all dissent is tainted ?
The religious right is not seditious . Jerry Falwell nor Pat Robertson have urged the violent overthrow of the government. What changes do they want that the left is hyperventilating over. Roe vs Wade would merely turn the matter to the states. For the record I am in favor of the existing law . The other demands school prayer and no gay marriage. Gays made a mistake in not accepting civil unions. The majority of America prefers that option.
The left has a history of sedition and should be watched. The Venona cables proved conclusively the left betrayed America. Does this mean all dissent against the war is sedition. Horowitz nor I make this claim but there are some important distinctions.
1 The dissent should be based on the policy.If you think that this is not in America's best intrest this is okay.
2 You should not attack Capitalism , America's History or add conpiracy theories.
3 No signs that advocate violence against officers or defeaism.
4 Distance yourself from Totalitarian Extreemists like Answer or Code Pink
5 Stay on message protest the war and stay on message. Palestine , Animal Rights and housing belong in seperate forums.
In the internet era everyone comes under scrutiny including Horowitz. If you are not up to the challenge do not publish . Horowitz has a right to interpret what you say and to add his two cents. Have any of you protested the Neocon Cabal routine ? Raimondo and others have been pushing variations on that theme. If you failed to say yes and are complaining you are a hypocrite.
Another familiar theme is the cheap shot over the death of Betty Van Patter. If one spends the time and reads his account the point is clear. Horowitz was a true believer in the cult of the left . The Pathers were the revolutionary vangard of the left. Like most followers of cults he did not believe the press acounts. Anyone who has contact with the far left knows they live in a seperate reality. Horowitz detractors conceed that his friend was killed by the Black Panthers. If one reads Pearsons Shadow of the Panhther on realizes that they were a streetgang with good PR.They told the brain impaired White leftist what they wanted to here. Horowitz and the true believers did the rest of the heavy lifting. The death of Van Patter started his move away from the left. He began an objective look at the lies of the left. One can read them in his excellent Second Thoughts Book.
There are a whole range of Authors who made the same journey. One can read Julius Lesters Journey in Lovesong. Ronald Radosh doccuments his journey in Commies. Peter Collier and Stephen Schwartz made this same trip. Christopher Hitchens is making the
break currenty.The extreeme left is a dead end commited to nothing other than obstructionism. I love my country and most liberals do as well. The time has come for
the blame America first crowd to go. Chomsky, Moore,Lerner, and Benjamin should be pushed out the door.
Do not blame Horowitz for pointing out the disease. Purge the extreemists and move forward with the rest of us. America does not benefit from one party rule. Conservatives become Lazy without competition. We are in danger of becoming a one party Country. That is a recipie for corruption and stagnation for our country.
Friday, March 25, 2005
Race Republicans and the Left
I post in a variety of Forums and a question came up from a liberal friend who uses the screen name Tricky Blaine. My contention is that conservatives think about race
very infrequently.We have discussed race as a tangent to the middle east conflict. My contention that Palestinians are Arabs has zero racial content. Arabs are semites and thus by definition white. The contention was there is no Palestinian ethnicity contains zero racial content.The argument was based entirely on history and sociology. The left leveled charges and were asked to point them out. They failed to find a fact out of order or a bigoted quote.
Tricky Blaine who is a liberal would be the first to tell you I do not like race baiting. The truth is that even when provoked I will not respond in that manner. The truth is that people who respond with racial taunts look uneducated. Therefore when my friend Uptown Steve engages in his frequent angry man routine I never respond in kind. I tend to offer a comedic reparte aimed at him personally. He does have a rather unusual fixation on the Gorton's Fisherman. The poor guy even suposedly has the outfit. Were I to respond in similar racial terms it would not accomplish anything. The other problem is I do not hold hatred based upon race in my heart. I see people as individuals rather than members of subgroups.
The truth is that the Conservatives I associate with spend little time on the subject. The little time they do spend is in reaction to the professional race hustlers Jackson, Sharpton and Farakhan. The fact is I like certain authors Walter E Williams, Thomas Sowell , Julius Lester , Larry Elder who agree with my point of view. I like JC Watts , Condi Rice and Collin Powell and would not hesitate to vote for them unless Rudy were running against them. The black experience is part of my cultural heritage as an American. The joy of being an American is that you are part of something greater than your individual community.
Race, Ethnicity and Sexual Orientation are largely irrelevant to me. Do any of those qualities affect on the ability to perform a task. Do they tell me if you would make a good friend or neighbor ? Do they tell me what kind of person you are ? This is why
I perceive people as individuals. I also do not take things too seriously and enjoy a good joke. I wish that some of the critics of this blog would be more creative in their personal attacks.
The bottom line is that we are all Americans. All of us are going to agree all of the time. Yet we should respect cultural and ethnic differences. This blog is dedicated to a celebration of the First Amendment. You do not have to agree with me to get my respect. Come in speak your mind and be eloquent if possible. America is a big tent and there is room for all.
very infrequently.We have discussed race as a tangent to the middle east conflict. My contention that Palestinians are Arabs has zero racial content. Arabs are semites and thus by definition white. The contention was there is no Palestinian ethnicity contains zero racial content.The argument was based entirely on history and sociology. The left leveled charges and were asked to point them out. They failed to find a fact out of order or a bigoted quote.
Tricky Blaine who is a liberal would be the first to tell you I do not like race baiting. The truth is that even when provoked I will not respond in that manner. The truth is that people who respond with racial taunts look uneducated. Therefore when my friend Uptown Steve engages in his frequent angry man routine I never respond in kind. I tend to offer a comedic reparte aimed at him personally. He does have a rather unusual fixation on the Gorton's Fisherman. The poor guy even suposedly has the outfit. Were I to respond in similar racial terms it would not accomplish anything. The other problem is I do not hold hatred based upon race in my heart. I see people as individuals rather than members of subgroups.
The truth is that the Conservatives I associate with spend little time on the subject. The little time they do spend is in reaction to the professional race hustlers Jackson, Sharpton and Farakhan. The fact is I like certain authors Walter E Williams, Thomas Sowell , Julius Lester , Larry Elder who agree with my point of view. I like JC Watts , Condi Rice and Collin Powell and would not hesitate to vote for them unless Rudy were running against them. The black experience is part of my cultural heritage as an American. The joy of being an American is that you are part of something greater than your individual community.
Race, Ethnicity and Sexual Orientation are largely irrelevant to me. Do any of those qualities affect on the ability to perform a task. Do they tell me if you would make a good friend or neighbor ? Do they tell me what kind of person you are ? This is why
I perceive people as individuals. I also do not take things too seriously and enjoy a good joke. I wish that some of the critics of this blog would be more creative in their personal attacks.
The bottom line is that we are all Americans. All of us are going to agree all of the time. Yet we should respect cultural and ethnic differences. This blog is dedicated to a celebration of the First Amendment. You do not have to agree with me to get my respect. Come in speak your mind and be eloquent if possible. America is a big tent and there is room for all.
Be careful what you wish for .
I was at the RNC protests in NYC and met with plenty of far left extreemist. Most of the time the arguments were fairly civil. Many of the protesters had a hard time believing a person who spoke with the same accent was a Republican. You are not the typical Republican was the most frequent response. The truth is there is a big tent in the Republican Party . It is almost impossible to tell what our views are on any particular subject unless we tell you. In general we are united by Nationalism and a Pro business approach with great variation.
The highlight of my time was meeting with the older protesters. There was a conversation with these older protesters that was interesting. These older protesters admitted the greatest mistake was pushing the Watergate story. These older radicals shocked me by saying they would vote for Nixon instead of Kerry. This
is not shocking to me as Nixon was a pragmatist. He was a mighty Cold War Liberal whose domestic policy was more liberal than Clinton's.
The premise was that the destruction of Nixon paved way for the Conservatives to dominate the Republican party.This led to Reagan - Bush domination of the landscape.
They had come to understand that Nixon had vision and acted upon it. There was some
grumbling about his Latin American policies but the older protesters still claimed to prefer Nixon to Kerry.
The moral of the story is be careful what you wish for least you receive it.
The highlight of my time was meeting with the older protesters. There was a conversation with these older protesters that was interesting. These older protesters admitted the greatest mistake was pushing the Watergate story. These older radicals shocked me by saying they would vote for Nixon instead of Kerry. This
is not shocking to me as Nixon was a pragmatist. He was a mighty Cold War Liberal whose domestic policy was more liberal than Clinton's.
The premise was that the destruction of Nixon paved way for the Conservatives to dominate the Republican party.This led to Reagan - Bush domination of the landscape.
They had come to understand that Nixon had vision and acted upon it. There was some
grumbling about his Latin American policies but the older protesters still claimed to prefer Nixon to Kerry.
The moral of the story is be careful what you wish for least you receive it.
Thursday, March 24, 2005
Birth of a Neocon and defending Horowitz
People who pass this blog assume I am a far right idealouge. The truth is I am a Rudy/Arnold Republican and a moderate. I do enjoy civil debate and I wish we had more of it here. A true Conservative is dedicated to free speech that we endorse here each and every day. I have allowed attacks on myself that were entirely personal. This is part of the burden we must share for the privilege of being an American. Someday there will be white power nuts and their posts will be dealt with as comedic relief. Traditional liberals shared this view and understood this reality.
This is why I am glad when liberals like the Chemist or Kafka come here and share their opinions. We are celebrating the tradition of our American heritage by having open forums.
Kafka makes valid points that I often agree with. The truth is that if we took Israel
and the current war off the table my views are closer to his than the average reader assumes. The question is how do people who agree on so much end up on opposite sides ? I have described how I ended up as a Republican in previous posts. Now I will
detail my dissent from my logical home.
The issue as adressed by Kafka is that I am obsessed with Israel. The truth is I do not like talking on the subject. The reason that we spend so much time is that the left devotes itself to absurd anti Israel mania. There are entire blogs dedicated to nothing but Israel bashing and I am obsessed ? The claim was that the leftist critics
want balance. Have any of these blogs said a word about PA abuses such as harboring terrorists , lynching collaborators or rampant corruption ? The excuse given is well....... I never endorsed terrorism. Another critic expected the David project to be critical of Israel. Do you extend this logic to ISN or the lefty blogs ?
This disproportionate and often bigoted approach has pushed myself and others away. The acceptance of the blame america first crowd hurts the party. Republicans use Rudy, Arnold and McCain as surrogates appealing to middle America. The Democrats had Bill Clinton who polarizes in several key states. Kerry was a poor choice who was he appealing to "big media staffers". His intellectual incohernce and inability relate to common people were a disaster.
What does America see when they see the opposition ? They see extreemists like Chomsky,Michael Moore, Code Pink , International Answer. They see tinfoil hat conpiracy clowns and a host of communists and anarchists. They see extreeme hatred and moronic signs Bush = Hitler, Brooklyn out of Palestine and no vision.If the Democrats are ever going to rehabilitate themselves there must be a purge. Communists , Anarchists and bigots have no place in a functional party. Let them have their own parties and be kept at arms length.
Where does a social liberal,anti communist & nationalist belong ?
Enter into the mix the Late Eric Briendel,David Horowitz, Stephen Schwartz ,David Yeagley, Ronald Radosh and Monica Crowley.
These are nationalistic view points clearly dedicated to the ideals of our country without Communist blame America first bagage. Horowitz has the same right to free speech that every other American has. Unlike Raimondo , Chomsky and Michael Lerner he provides an open forum. He hides from nobody and reads this blog occasionally. I have exchanged numerous emails the rule is keep it short. Interestingly most of the criticism of late comes over the accademic bill of rights. The issue is abuse of power and professionalism in academia. I have discussed this on other blogs and the critics see this as a zionistic attempt to silence the opponents of Israel. The issue
is largely about abuse of power. Professors do not have the right to indocrinate students. They should be held accountable to act professional in a classroom. His forum has docummented a pattern of unethical behavior of some educators. Even in a business college (Baruch )I had to grit my teeth at times. The most absurd moment came when a professor called Anatoly Scharansky a CIA agent . He was still in the gulag at the time. However the vast majority of the educators were dedicated to their craft. There was an English professor who had some minor issues with NY Post readers .
The other critique of Horowitz is that his work is considered apostasy by the left.
His books describe a disillusionment with a cult like left wing. His life is chronicled in Radical Son. However one can read a host of similar accounts in the Second Thoughts conference. Ronald Radosh also has a wonderful and often comedic book Commies on the same subject. As a NYC member of this same ethnic group I had my own experiences with the similar types.His cult like description described people that were familiar.Michael Savage does a lampoon calling this crowd "Red Diaper Doper Babies " . The truth is there is an even more insanely liberal school than NYU up the block The New School for Social Research. I know the cast of charachters
first hand.
Horowitz has dedicated the later part of his career to informing the public of the tactics and members of the left.The left has perpetrated a series of lies , treason and sedition. The greatest lie was the Rosenberg myth and that CPUSA was independent of Moscow. The Venona Cables destroyed this myth and should be required reading. The
problem is the Totalitarian left uses front organizations to influence policy. The National Lawyers guild , ISN and ANSWER are front groups used to advance the extreemist influence. The public has the right to know that the woman in charge of health care cites a radical nut Michael Lerner. These extreemist do not belong anywhere near mainstream political parties. Let them form their own party and restore liberalism as a patriotic movement.
Horowitz has documented the abuses and abnormal fixation on Jews, Israel and Neocons.
This pattern of intollerance exists in the blogospere as well. Pro Israel posters are not allowed to post their side. We had visitors to this blog call me every name
under the sun. They have not refuted one fact in a post that was merely 1/3 complette. Still they come here and call me a liar and a bigot and have no quotes
or faulty facts. "You cant trust Plaut , Horowitz ,Farah as they are Zionist stooges". Horowitz , Dershowitz and the David project have a right to voice their opinions and perceptions as the leftist radicals.
Raimondo and others put the same scruitiny on Horowitz that he places on others. Do these leftists complain about neocon fixations ? It is healthy for the process that everyone is held accountable including Horowitz.
This is why I am glad when liberals like the Chemist or Kafka come here and share their opinions. We are celebrating the tradition of our American heritage by having open forums.
Kafka makes valid points that I often agree with. The truth is that if we took Israel
and the current war off the table my views are closer to his than the average reader assumes. The question is how do people who agree on so much end up on opposite sides ? I have described how I ended up as a Republican in previous posts. Now I will
detail my dissent from my logical home.
The issue as adressed by Kafka is that I am obsessed with Israel. The truth is I do not like talking on the subject. The reason that we spend so much time is that the left devotes itself to absurd anti Israel mania. There are entire blogs dedicated to nothing but Israel bashing and I am obsessed ? The claim was that the leftist critics
want balance. Have any of these blogs said a word about PA abuses such as harboring terrorists , lynching collaborators or rampant corruption ? The excuse given is well....... I never endorsed terrorism. Another critic expected the David project to be critical of Israel. Do you extend this logic to ISN or the lefty blogs ?
This disproportionate and often bigoted approach has pushed myself and others away. The acceptance of the blame america first crowd hurts the party. Republicans use Rudy, Arnold and McCain as surrogates appealing to middle America. The Democrats had Bill Clinton who polarizes in several key states. Kerry was a poor choice who was he appealing to "big media staffers". His intellectual incohernce and inability relate to common people were a disaster.
What does America see when they see the opposition ? They see extreemists like Chomsky,Michael Moore, Code Pink , International Answer. They see tinfoil hat conpiracy clowns and a host of communists and anarchists. They see extreeme hatred and moronic signs Bush = Hitler, Brooklyn out of Palestine and no vision.If the Democrats are ever going to rehabilitate themselves there must be a purge. Communists , Anarchists and bigots have no place in a functional party. Let them have their own parties and be kept at arms length.
Where does a social liberal,anti communist & nationalist belong ?
Enter into the mix the Late Eric Briendel,David Horowitz, Stephen Schwartz ,David Yeagley, Ronald Radosh and Monica Crowley.
These are nationalistic view points clearly dedicated to the ideals of our country without Communist blame America first bagage. Horowitz has the same right to free speech that every other American has. Unlike Raimondo , Chomsky and Michael Lerner he provides an open forum. He hides from nobody and reads this blog occasionally. I have exchanged numerous emails the rule is keep it short. Interestingly most of the criticism of late comes over the accademic bill of rights. The issue is abuse of power and professionalism in academia. I have discussed this on other blogs and the critics see this as a zionistic attempt to silence the opponents of Israel. The issue
is largely about abuse of power. Professors do not have the right to indocrinate students. They should be held accountable to act professional in a classroom. His forum has docummented a pattern of unethical behavior of some educators. Even in a business college (Baruch )I had to grit my teeth at times. The most absurd moment came when a professor called Anatoly Scharansky a CIA agent . He was still in the gulag at the time. However the vast majority of the educators were dedicated to their craft. There was an English professor who had some minor issues with NY Post readers .
The other critique of Horowitz is that his work is considered apostasy by the left.
His books describe a disillusionment with a cult like left wing. His life is chronicled in Radical Son. However one can read a host of similar accounts in the Second Thoughts conference. Ronald Radosh also has a wonderful and often comedic book Commies on the same subject. As a NYC member of this same ethnic group I had my own experiences with the similar types.His cult like description described people that were familiar.Michael Savage does a lampoon calling this crowd "Red Diaper Doper Babies " . The truth is there is an even more insanely liberal school than NYU up the block The New School for Social Research. I know the cast of charachters
first hand.
Horowitz has dedicated the later part of his career to informing the public of the tactics and members of the left.The left has perpetrated a series of lies , treason and sedition. The greatest lie was the Rosenberg myth and that CPUSA was independent of Moscow. The Venona Cables destroyed this myth and should be required reading. The
problem is the Totalitarian left uses front organizations to influence policy. The National Lawyers guild , ISN and ANSWER are front groups used to advance the extreemist influence. The public has the right to know that the woman in charge of health care cites a radical nut Michael Lerner. These extreemist do not belong anywhere near mainstream political parties. Let them form their own party and restore liberalism as a patriotic movement.
Horowitz has documented the abuses and abnormal fixation on Jews, Israel and Neocons.
This pattern of intollerance exists in the blogospere as well. Pro Israel posters are not allowed to post their side. We had visitors to this blog call me every name
under the sun. They have not refuted one fact in a post that was merely 1/3 complette. Still they come here and call me a liar and a bigot and have no quotes
or faulty facts. "You cant trust Plaut , Horowitz ,Farah as they are Zionist stooges". Horowitz , Dershowitz and the David project have a right to voice their opinions and perceptions as the leftist radicals.
Raimondo and others put the same scruitiny on Horowitz that he places on others. Do these leftists complain about neocon fixations ? It is healthy for the process that everyone is held accountable including Horowitz.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)