Saturday, December 11, 2010

Communist Stupidity

One is quite familiar with the false claims of Communists of alleged anti intellectualism of their critics. Commies pretend the mantle of when preaching their idiocy. They point to those advocates who want to teach intelligent design or creationism in school. In actuality that conversation lasts about a minute or two. Compare this with their emphasis on teaching young kids about homosexuality at all ages.Unlike my peers, I have no problem with teaching people to respect those who are different, so long as it is not a high pitched preachy rant. Yes we should grasp that many people are different in color, height, weight, ethnicity, religion and some live differently. This is quite different than discussing techniques and the age at which that is appropriate is a topic for serious discussion of a separate post.

I want to point out that commies have a fixation with Jews that exceeds your average red neck fixation with Blacks. Thus we are not shocked to find an inordinate number of far leftists and commies comprising 9-11 Truthers. Even an expert on cranks like Art Bell notes the rabid paranoia and Jew hatred amongst the conspiracy clowns. Facts and science don't mean much to lunatics creating idiotic claims and using the same techniques as Holocaust deniers. The Duck and lefties feign they have nothing to do with these rants. Most amusing was Weasie who pretended to be some sort of intellectual while clinging to Zionist Pearl Harbor 9-11 Truther nonsense.

Before, I go further I wish to point out the difference in spirit. A Christian like AOW, Z, Junglemom, Warren, TMW and of course Justin holds their religion as a positive core value. They serve the poor as Christs calling or in the case of Rav Roov as a community calling. This also separates them from the frauds who mix hateful
class warfare and seemingly add Marx to the Testaments. The guilty parties know who they are and if you are preaching Liberation Theology or its Jewish corollaries you are neither Jewish or Christian in spirit or function. Note the actions are heart felt things that are positive aspects of their life.

I want to immediately point out so called Rabbi Snagglepuss and Howard Zinn lent their names to a Truther Petition. When the scandal became larger they claimed to be lied to. Of course Rabbi Snagglepus once again fails to notice the large presence of anti semetic clowns that even Art Bell noticed in about two seconds. We can ask what type of so called "American" believes that a government barely in office created a massive conspiracy requiring hundreds to kill about three thousand for expressly political purposes. Bill Clinton's finest moment was when he dismissed a 9-11 heckler
and even Bill Maher dealt with these nuts. Is Rabbi Snagglepuss acting as a Jew or a freak show specimen far leftist trying to be with the Cult of Marx at all costs.

Now the Duck can claim correctly, that he has never engaged in this brand of idiocy.
It is included on rants of blogs he visited and their owners had to be shamed by yours truly and others for permitting the modern blood libel on their sites and differentiating their own positions.

Moving onto the fixation and lies by Commies about Jews and Israel. Commies frequently point out with mock horror that Israeli Id documents point out religion. Commies are also quite silent in that their beloved Soviet Union listed Jew as a Nationality on their ID documents. Anyone remotely familiar with international ID will point out that this is done in every Muslim country as well including those that are practically ethnically cleansed.

The Communist Shlomo Sand has decided for political purposes that Jews were an invented people. For his efforts he has been hailed as a scholar. In his warped theory Ashkenazis are Khazars with no collection to the land. The problem was that evidence shows that like Philistines, Khazars disappeared from history. There has been zero evidence of any concrete nature. Moreover, repeated genetic and linguistic studies have shown this to be a comedic hoax. Indigenous people have rights except when they are Jews or in the path of communist aggression in Nicaragua, Laos or elsewhere. Yasser Arafat and Prof Said who were hailed as Palestinians were in fact Egyptian. The claims of ethnicity by the Hmong, Commanche and even the people of Brooklyn are superior to claims of Palestinian ethnicity. The people of Brooklyn hail Spike Lee as our leader except he is not even from Brooklyn. The people of Brooklyn are about as related to the Canarsie Indians as Arabs are to Phillistines who lived in Gaza, not Judea and Samaria and were invaders from Crete and can not be found in the writings of Josephus.

Arabs have furthered this by claiming their was no temple in Jerusalem and that the Cave of Rachel is a Mosque. In fact the Dome of the Rock has zero connection to Islam
and Jerusalem is never mentioned by name in the Koran. The structure was actually a Church appropriated by Muslims and billed as the furthest mosque in a political feud.

Further making this comedic is the place is described in Arab literature and even the name Al Quds derives from the Hebrew name Mikdash or Temple. Of the Duck who claims to be a Christian needs to ponder if his soul-mates are saying no temple in Jerusalem then no Jesus and who was that man described by Josephus briefly.

The Communist obsession with anti science and logic is not as great as their political need to erase the Jewish people. If Jews are not related to the people of the Bible than the State of Israel has no legitimacy.

There are several flawed logical points. Repeated genetic studies have shown Jews are related. Moreover, the entire obsession with a genetic Judaism by the left is not too far removed from the Third Reich. Eugenics was part of the pure science of the left approach and Margaret Sanger did want to eliminate less desirable types and was very far removed from her historical portrait. History has shown us that when God is removed or a leader is God under Communism that bodies pile up quickly.

The primary flaw is Judaism has from its start discouraged but eventually accepted converts as equals. Thus my Irish, English, Scott and Cherokee sister in law has converted before she met her husband and is an equal in the community. The notion that she is somehow less equal on the basis of genes is an affront to my egalitarian democratic values that are at the core of my Americanism. This egalitarianism is also the cornerstone of Christianity. In fact my strident opposition to racialism and frequently homophobia stands in stark contrast to Communist stoking and rationalizing of the most strident forms of Jew hatred masquerading as anti Zionism.

Communists also invented man made global warming and foisted it as a fact. The truth is Communist regimes had dreadful records on the environment, worker safety and human rights. The nature of thinly disguised Marxists posing as guardians of the planet and the moral arbiters of anything is pure comedy.

Sorry, there leftards but as a moderate you live with the delusions of superiority.
For example communists live with the myth of great art created under communism. In reality none of it will have the lasting cultural impact of your average Disney film like Bambi or Shrek. Even the best accounts of Communism in Literature comes not from its followers, but from its critics Orwell, Pasternak and so forth.

Make, no mistake that the next time a lefty points their finger at their imagined
belief in science, logic or moral superiority you heard the score here.

I would sooner have people of honor like the Christians I have named above or even the Pagan Temple than the hateful so called men of "reason" who falsely proclaim themselves intellectuals.

24 comments:

Ducky's here said...

Damn, you are insane. Stuff a sock in it you bigoted freak.

Though I have to admit you are about the first I have run into who claims a person converting to a religion can't be accepted in that religion.

Then you go on with racial nonsense that is explains why you loved to suck up to Yeagley.

Why not can the racial theories and go back to getting upset that nobody takes this "officer" thing seriously an accept that you're just a little government hack with lousy grammar.

beamish said...

I'm surprised that in your catalog of leftist unfamiliarities with logic you didn't touch the global warming expertise of Osama Bin Laden.

The Pagan Temple said...

I would sooner have people of honor like the Christians I have named above or even the Pagan Temple

Thank you. I think.

Always On Watch said...

Certainly in my case, a life of Christian service hasn't lined my pockets. You've been to my house, Beak, and have seen for yourself how modestly we live.

All of my liberal and leftist acquaintances live in luxury.

Oh, well.

BTW, I'm hoping to get my spare bedroom restored to guest-room status. You're welcome to stay here anytime.

beakerkin said...

Duncy

Your comments are proof that commies fail basic reading comprehension.

Mr B

Osama Bin Ladden at times does sound like a cliche leftist.

Pagan

You have honor. Commies have none.

Ducky's here said...

@Beak - Repeated genetic studies have shown Jews are related.
---------------
Did I misread that or where you quoting something from your buddy Yeagley's site?

@Beak - For example communists live with the myth of great art created under communism. In reality none of it will have the lasting cultural impact of your average Disney film like Bambi or Shrek.

-------

Now Beak, why not research concepts like montage editing or the Kuleshov effect. They are at work every time you see an action film, a music video and many commercials. Early Soviet film had just a little more influence than Shrek.

You may wish to study modernism and the influence of Soviet art. Study it wth the idiot Beamish who needs a break from the stupefying effects of metal.

beakerkin said...

Here we go again with the Duck's odd obsession with film. Sorry to enlighten you but devoted film fans of all ages will be discussing Shrek, Bambi long after you are a memory.

Communist Art like everything else produced under communism was garbage.

The best art came from the anti Soviets, deal with it.

Fact repeated genetic studies indicate that Jews are related to each other. The efforts of Communist Sand are in fact typical
of Communist abuse of history and disdain for science and facts when expedient.

Ducky's here said...

So you agree with the fool Yeagley that there is a Jewish race?

Was Rodchenko an anti-Soviet? Pardon me if I point out that you are even less qualified than Beamish to comment on matters of art history.

I certainly agree that soviet realism, the style of art preferred and promoted by Ayn Rand, was pretty junky but that came later than the productive movements.

beamish said...

Now Beak, why not research concepts like montage editing or the Kuleshov effect. They are at work every time you see an action film, a music video and many commercials. Early Soviet film had just a little more influence than Shrek.

I'd hardly consider Lev Kuleshov's
work to be representative of "Soviet film" given Stalin's party-line rejection of formalism in art.

But, if it makes the historical illiterates of the left-wing happy, I suppose an idiot could edit the history of Soviet filmography to include Kuleshov as a major influence on it.

But it wouldn't make sense to anyone familiar with or qualified to speak on the topic.

You may wish to study modernism and the influence of Soviet art. Study it wth the idiot Beamish who needs a break from the stupefying effects of metal.

Yet anyone actually familiar with art and history quite easily finds Soviet film theory rejecting Kuleshov's montage formalism under Stalin. Kuleshov himself didn't film a thing after 1943, much less violate the official state ban on developing the montage theories of his creative work.

I studied film and audio / visual editing in high school, Ducky.

You're going to have to find a topic you can blow smoke about. Holding up Kuleshov as an example of "Soviet art" when his particular contribution to the whole was both minimal and minimized by Stalinist promotion of Socialist Realism, which supressed things like "Kuleshov effects" in cinema.

Try a topic you can expound upon, Ducky. Like getting your lunch money stolen by the big girl in class.

beakerkin said...

Ducky

Your fellow Communists Sand has ignored repeated genetic studies that show Jews are related to each other. In the case of Sand, it was a political tract masking itself oblivious to the science on a par with Holocaust denial.

You seem to be fixated on Yeagley. In his case he holds good ideas that he is very mistaken about as opposed to your political criminality.

Facts

Yeagley is pro- American, but fails to grasp we are an egalitarian republic open to all
that share a set of basic beliefs
that do not include Marxism.

On the other hand you are an anti American cliche bug eyed loon who
seeks the destruction of the USA and can be counted upon to side with any and every enemy of the State.

Yeagley has some vulgar views about Blacks and race mixing though
he himself is a product of it. You are a rabid antisemite who seeks the elimination of the Jewish state
and can be counted upon to post rather droll cliches.

1) Jews who support the State of Israel are called Likudnicks or comedically Kahanists. How a secularist with a Hindu family becomes an advocate of a Torah state is only known to bird brained communists. Real Kahanists
such as MZ, are open about their beliefs and are very soft on communists.

2) You have your own history of racist statements calling Condi Rice, Judge Thomas and others racialist names when expedient.
Calling a Black person Slappy or Aunt Jemimah is about one step removed from the N word.

3)Yeagley has never supported or rationalized terror or physical violence anywhere. You seem to fall into the rationalization about oppression. Who was Bill Ayers oppressed by and his crimes had zero to do with the Vietnam war. A more coherent view is they were treason and his father got him off on a technicality.

As I see it you are inferior to Yeagley in every respect.

Always On Watch said...

About Duck's first comment in this thread....Looks to me as if Duck's meds need adjustment.

The_Editrix said...

Beak, I am at a loss how Yeagley came in here, but to say he is pro- American is ridiculous. Don't you remember that he drooled over the valiant Japanese who attacked you at Pearl Harbour? How the Germans had honour (while they were performing the Holocaust)? He is drooling over any violent creep history has brought forward, mainly, but not limited to, Adolf Hitler.

And Yeagley hasn't got "some vulgar views about blacks and race mixing", that is the euphemism of the century. He is a full-blown racist. That he does, for some rather extracerebral reasons only he understands, support Israel doesn't change that one bit.

Yeagley is supporting terror and physical violence against people of whom he doesn't approve (mainly, but not exclusively, based on skin tone) all the way. He is just too much of a coward to say so in simple terms. If there is one thing in his sorry existence at which he is really good, it's obfuscating his agenda of hatred and genocide. I can find quotes to prove all that. But as I've done so before and as that didn't have any effect on you, my good will to do it again (and again) is limited.

There are good reasons to dislike the Duck. But to compare him with Yeagley in a way that is flattering to the latter is beyond ridiculous.

Ducky's here said...

Beamish, if you were paying attention you would have noticed that I mentioned the destruction of Soviet art under Stalin.

It was destroyed in favor of the type of art favored by most Americans and readily available at your local Thomas Kincaid gallery.

The Soviet Union under Lenin was exceptionally creative.

Ducky's here said...

@Beamish --
Yet anyone actually familiar with art and history quite easily finds Soviet film theory rejecting Kuleshov's montage formalism under Stalin.

-------------

That is not contested. Although Vertov and a few others kept working in the montage style a few years into Stalin. However, it was much more open under Lenin.

Not that you've ever watched any of it. Maybe you should look for work conducting string quartets or brokering Rush or Bon Jovi reunions.

Ducky's here said...

Beak's man love for Yeagley comes to the fore again.

beamish said...

It was destroyed in favor of the type of art favored by most Americans and readily available at your local Thomas Kincaid gallery.

The Soviet Union under Lenin was exceptionally creative.


"Creative" in the sense of creating propaganda in place of documenting verifiable evidence that communism is a viable economic theory to foist upon people at the point of a Kalashnikov rifle.

You need to decide how to stop contradicting yourself, Ducky. Was the "Kuleshov Effect" and early Soviet montage theory the forerunning influence of American "action films, music videos and commercials" (which you seem to appreciate) or was it "destroyed in favor of the type of art favored by most Americans and readily available at your local Thomas Kincaid gallery" (to become the forerunning influence of American "action films, music videos and commercials," which you seem to despise.)

While you're trying to figure out how to weasel out of your utter unfamiliarity with film theory and art history, why not catch us up on the nuances of something you do actually know?

Gerbils up your ass. Head or tail first?

Anonymous said...

The_Editrix said...
Beak, I am at a loss how Yeagley came in here, but to say he is pro- American is ridiculous. Don't you remember that he drooled over the valiant Japanese who attacked you at Pearl Harbour? How the Germans had honour (while they were performing the Holocaust)? He is drooling over any violent creep history has brought forward, mainly, but not limited to, Adolf Hitler.

And Yeagley hasn't got "some vulgar views about blacks and race mixing", that is the euphemism of the century. He is a full-blown racist. That he does, for some rather extracerebral reasons only he understands, support Israel doesn't change that one bit.

Yeagley is supporting terror and physical violence against people of whom he doesn't approve (mainly, but not exclusively, based on skin tone) all the way. He is just too much of a coward to say so in simple terms. If there is one thing in his sorry existence at which he is really good, it's obfuscating his agenda of hatred and genocide. I can find quotes to prove all that. But as I've done so before and as that didn't have any effect on you, my good will to do it again (and again) is limited.

It seems these words are better than my own, but with respect to dr jackboot, seems his beloved KIN badeagle, sold out his own peeps to the longknives by turning them in at palo duro canyon where the army killed over 1000 horses of Quanah parker thus maybe the judas nic goes with the little tin foiled perveyor of seig heil so called injun MO, or again the shadow knows along with the BRUCE, and Beakster Shalom

Ducky's here said...

Beamish, you certainly have earned your place as a Beak favorite.

Soviet art in general was destroyed under Stalin in favor of "Soviet realism" which was incidentally championed by Ayn Rand. Hard edge, representational, large scale. The aesthetic translated to film which became epic and pretty flat. Eisenstein's "Ivan the Terrible" was a very notable exception.

Now, just what examples of Soviet montage have you watched? It's not the kind of stuff you see on cable or in theaters. Anything to share? My guess is that your experience is a limited as your music choices and it's all present in your constricted general thought.

beamish said...

It's true Ducky. I don't concentrate on the minutiae of crap as you do.

Now, clarify for us what your real gripe is - that American film allegedly takes its cues from the montage propaganda forms that Stalin supressed, or that Soviet Realism allegedly caters to American tastes in cinema?

Or, in your cue card dislike of Ayn Rand (who has nothing to do with film theory whatsoever) are you seeing her name associated with a style of film and knee-jerking against it in the same way actually becoming familiar with your subject matter stymies your repetoire of intellectual expression?

Again, instead of trying to pretend you're aware of film theory, why not stick with what you know? Gerbils - head first up your ass?

Ducky's here said...

Beamish, why not give us a little essay on the influence of Constructivism on the frame composition in Eisenstein's "Strike"?

Something interesting.

Ducky's here said...

To answer your question Beamish:

1. American cinema always lagged to a large extent. A large element of our early silent industry was imported from Sweden and, naturally, there was an influx from Germany before the war.
D. W. Griffith was one director who had worldwide influenced on early editing but the Soviets saw it fully developed.

2. Rands aesthetics lined up completely with Soviet realism which was primarily a painting theory but influenced all arts, unfortunately.
It still represents a form that right wingers consider desirable.

beamish said...

Well, Ducky?

What is it? Since your utter unfamiliarity with film theory and art history has once again choked you out, how's that gerbil doing?

Ducky's here said...

Punked out again, eh Mr. Metal?

Care to take a stab at answering one of the questions you illiterate.

beamish said...

You first, Ducky.

We've already established that your contraditoary statements make you a poseur with no grasp of film theory.

Let's discuss a topic you know something about.

That gerbil in your ass. Is it wearing a snokel or a scuba tank?