Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Marriage rate at all time low

Unless one is going for an immigration benefit fewer people are getting married. The blame is not entirely on the Obama economy, as there are other factors.

My own case is an excellent example of this. I have been dating and supporting a family for almost six years. I have not considered marriage because the financial risks would be prohibitive. Moreover
having experienced what divorce attorneys do first hand I am not going back for round two. Malicious accusations of sexual abuse of children is common ( not my case) and the impact that it has is never discussed. This has happened to at least two coworkers. Actual abuse of children are far more apt with the subsequent romantic interest than the biological father.

Much of the marriage decline belongs squarely on lefties. Liberal divorce laws and vile anti male legal tactics have made marriage prohibitive. Add in absurd Obamacare costs and tax incentives for not marrying and you get the picture.


9 comments:

beakerkin said...

Among the oddities are false allegations about the sexual preferences of ex spouses. Rudy Giuliani and Michael Strahan both dealt with that quite well.

Women initiate the vast preponderance
of divorces and engage in some really shameful behavior. Then they spend the next decade whining about their ex.

Even on the job, the overwhelming number of poison pen letters come from females trying to hurt former spouses. There are abusive men out there, but nutty women are not ever discussed.

People asked me if I ever looked up a
former romantic interest. I leave those relationships in the past.
Unfortunately, I have dealt with people who don't share my notions. If
I wanted to talk, I would pick up a phone. When the person attempted to make contact I walked away. Weeks later a sibling of this person asked
and I was blunt. I never spent a moment thinking about her and I moved
ahead.

Trying to use relatives to keep tabs
on an ex for a decade is creepy. The
fact that if I encounter a mutual friend I don't ask should have been obvious by now.

Hopefully, I will be spared further
intrusions. To say I am livid at my sister in law for talking to an ex is
an understatement. The faux religious
veneer is just pure bs and it is not
the first time I had this discussion.

This is also a prime reason why I keep my daughter away from my family.
Other than my parents and my sisters kids I do not permit contact between
my brother and my daughter.


Ducky's here said...

You protest too much.

Anonymous said...

If you’re a cohabiting man, your head is on the chopping block next. Expect to see laws and policies that redefine domestic violence in terms of denial of monetary resources in cohabitation and the redefinition of cohabitation in terms of alimony and asset division.

These laws have already been pushed and passed in several nations and are being actively pursued in others. In countries where these laws don’t yet exist, judges are already legislating from the bench and awarding asset division and alimony to cohabiting women.

If you think you can escape the consequences of divorce through cohabitation, you’re just fooling yourself. The state, lawyers and judges are already teaming up globally to remove that possibility.

I advise all that don’t believe me to do their research on this topic. Don’t kid yourselves. Cohabitation reform laws are famous for being enacted quickly and are commonly hidden, to the extent possible, within larger legislation.

In case you think you can just “break up” if the law gets passed, think again. These laws commonly include grandfather clauses to keep people from escaping the consequences of the new law.

Ignore this information at your own peril.

Anonymous said...

You had better check your state laws. You are likely liable for both palimony and child support. Even if you don't have such laws in your state, judges can still award asset division, palimony and child support.

Read this link carefully. This will be the law of the land in the US soon:

http://www.canlaw.com/divorce/support.htm

Anonymous said...

"Much of the marriage decline belongs squarely on lefties."

That's it right there. Just f#$@ing brilliant. Does get any better than that.

Genius. Try for a job at an Apple retail store.

Anonymous said...

"Much of the marriage decline belongs squarely on lefties."

That's it right there. Just f#$@ing brilliant. Does get any better than that.

Genius. Try for a job at an Apple retail store.

beakerkin said...

Just who pushed for the social welfare state that discourages marriages. Who pushed for the changes in divorce law that made financial considerations a
forefront issue.

Aside from that want to guess the political affiliations of lawyers notably coaching spouses to make up false molestation charges.

Anonymous said...

Capitalism is doomed WITHOUT the social welfare state. No-one who really runs the country gives a rats toss bag about marriage. It's just a convenient distraction tool. Broken marriages mean money and possibly more marriages. Marriage decline is good for the economy. Talking up marriage is merely good for election campaigns. The family and all that. Give me a break.

For dogs sake, think man.

Lawyers "notably" eh? You devil you. Got all the real poop that makes the rest of us look silly. Can't the brilliant American justice system ferret out the truth? What are you doing just sitting on all this "notable" information, Kin? Piling it up to launch your final solution on the left? All those cumwads and death cultists? Bring it dude.

beakerkin said...

Classic Jew as Nazi bit. As I am dedicated and bound by law genocide against Marxists isn't in the cards.
In your case if you could get a few of your commie buddies to pull a Jim Jones
it would be the ultimate social justice.

The planet is improved when Marxists kill themselves.