Obama has had his moments such as the elimination of Osama. He has been more aggressive in the use of drone strikes against terrorists.
The questions for all of us are simple
1) Are you better off than you were four years ago?
2) Did the changes he enacted produce hope or hopelessness?
3) When and where has Obama led anyone seriously?
4) Has he met a traditional ally he has not knifed in the back?
In fairness some of the changes are world wide depression related. Yet the reality is do I have more confidence in a Romney, Perry or even Donald Duck to lead us out of this than Obama.
The Beakerkin plan
1) Scrap Obama care and focus on insurance reform
2) Investment tax credits
3) Make universities cosign loans for their students and open their books.
4) Withdraw and close all bases in Europe and scrap NATO. Place troops on the borders and eliminate or phase out asylum with quicker denials and preset deportations. Asylum is rife with fraud.
5) Invest in infrastructure projects.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
He has been more aggressive in the use of drone strikes against terrorists.
You can't collect any "intelligence" from a drone strike, and you can't waterboard a corpse. THAT is the "why" he aggressively pursue's "drone strikes"... so that he can pretend that you can win a war on "terror" w/o using any terror of your own.
If you don't want to get dirty, you shouldn't taunt tar babies into a fight.
Points well taken.
I just hope that the American electorate will look at these matters instead of voting according to the Cult of Personality.
Tell Your Buddy Pagan Temple this isnt over by a long shot. So i cant comment on his pages anymore and my own blog got shut down.. more than one way to skin a cat
Shadowhawk
I am a federal officer not Mr Postman.
Why are you so obsessed with Pagan anyway. He is kind of Vanilla and doesn't smack commies around as much as I do.
Why don't you find a site with loons more in tune with your brand of idiocy. There are plenty of sites for the ignoranti even with a few notable Commie sites closing down.
I have dealt with more talented trolls than you. FYI resorting to threats is criminal behavior and it makes you look like an unwashed chimp.
Learn some manners and get a bar of soap and try again.
You smack Commies around, Officer Strutter? Hardly.
A Federal Officer? Federal paper pushing hack is more like it.
Job require a degree?
Ducky
Lets compare bios
A decorated officer known for more courage and integrity than you will ever know. Funny when your lefty lawyer pals need a fair hearing they don't consider a low IQ dolt like yourself.
What do you compared to that.
You train would be pornographers and wedding photographers.HAHAHAHA
"HAHAHAHAHAHAHA You Moron" Kuhnkat
Capo Ren like any of your kind looks like road kill after any encounter. I merely end the pretense of civility with political criminals. If I am doing
my job your kind is squealing like
a stuck pig.
A true liberal is the unflinching enemy of your kind. Jefferson and Madison vs Marx and Lenin you lose.
Didn't answer the question, Beak.
Come on, it's a binary. Yes or no?
Duncy
No the majority of jobs don't. The exception are accounting, finance, nursing and most engineering jobs.
A look at the degrees of my coworkers related to what they do.
1) Several history majors including one who specializes in the 1800.
2) An art history major
3) Two lawyers
4) One sociology grad
5) Three business majors
6) One Industrial engineer
None of the above except the lawyers were trained in anything relevant to the job.
The art history major is an excellent officer. Her studies of whatever have zero to do with her skill.
That's utterly asinine. Her studies may well be a major contributing factor to her ability. Unless the job requires no critical thought and you open the discussion to that possibility.
Should she have been allowed to study art history or does His Nibs retain it on his list of verboten majors?
Her studies have zero to do with her skill as a dedicated officer. Her dedication to the law and geniality
are the secrets to her success.
4) should be 'has he met a traditional adversary that he has not caved in to?'
Garnet
That is a marked improvement
Post a Comment