I am starting to believe that many factors are in combination fueling the growth of antiamerican terrorism by Muslims in the USA. The recent culprits are spoiled brats ala Bill "Little Lord Fauntleroy" Ayers and are in no definition oppressed. Plenty of people are oppressed without committing treasonous acts of gratuitous violence. Most of these new criminals have exposure to elite western educations and have likely been spoon fed victimology by Marxists who want to fuel the fires for their own needs.
Certainly there is also an increase in this in rough financial times when people are struggling to find work and make ends meet. Many of those who act out also have deep psychological problems like the FT Hood shooter who couldn't buy a date. He was off topic in University assignments talking about political stuff unrelated to his class work. His likely left of center professors should have failed him for not completing his assignments. He also did try to resign from the military and was prevented.
It is not PC to state that gainfully employed folks are less apt to criminal acts of terrorism. However, our refusal to deal with the mental health aspects is an American citizen error. It is becoming clearer that many terrorists are unbalanced and turn to violent political opportunists
who abuse mentally unstable people. Perhaps it is not PC to say that folks who ask disturbed people to carry out terrorist acts are preying on the disabled.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Was Shahzad mentally disturbed or mentally retarded?
I haven't kept up with the story as well as I should have.
This is interesting:
Faisal Shahzad was naturalized April 17th 2009, one of the early beneficiary of Obama’s liberal immigration policy that threw open the borders to treat all countries of origin alike. Two months later he was back in Pakistan, presumably meeting and plotting with terrorist allies there.
True?
Islam is a cult. It's that simple, imo, and it probably does attract the mentally unstable.
Post a Comment