I am starting to think of the Obama Presidency as a huge Onion satire where nobody gets the joke. I understand liberals and I can follow their arguments even when disagreeing with them. In this case I can point to the courage and articulate style of Michael Bloomburg. He gives you a well thought out articulate response that you can honestly
disagree with but respect.
Obama is not a liberal or progressive. If he were progressive he would stop treating the American Worker like cannon fodder. How much illegal immigration is enough? Do we really need to be lax when jobs of any kind are scarce. Obama has no real interest in anyone other than the elites in academia and media. He lacks the grey matter to be either, but he pretends his policies make sense.
Obama only uses the word terrorist to describe those opposed to his satire agenda. Actual terrorists are rebranded as workplace violence or film criticism. The next huge attack will occur immediately after a Baron Sascha Cohen project.
Muslim film critics are just using symbolic criticism. Oddly Jews are exponentially more apt to be the victim of hate crimes than anyone else, but let's ignore actual crimes while we get at the TelePrompTer and pretend we are articulate.
Obama is a satirical president. Nobody gets the humor, but elites pretend to get it rather than admit the material just isn't funny.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
"Obama only uses the word terrorist to describe those opposed to his satire agenda."
That might be profound but you'd have to expand it a bit, Beak.
"I understand liberals"
Why don't you demonstrate any of that understanding here?
If he were progressive he would stop treating the American Worker like cannon fodder.
---------
Does that mean he's treating American workers like a fringe right winger would?
Oh, by the way, there are reports indicating that the immigration flow is negative.
You're an officer and privy to policy meetings, what's the real story?
I can follow their arguments even when disagreeing with them
-----------------
Maybe, but what gets my curiosity is our absolute inability to follow yours.
Are your arguments just too subtle? Maybe you should help us with occasional meaningful documentation of your theses.
Post a Comment